by blythspartan » 20 Sep 2023 08:12
by Winston Biscuit » 20 Sep 2023 08:20
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 20 Sep 2023 08:25
by Stranded » 20 Sep 2023 08:28
by Hound » 20 Sep 2023 08:33
by Snowflake Royal » 20 Sep 2023 08:44
Winston Biscuit he internet says this guy is bad news, yet no one seems to be able to actually say why he is bad news
by From Despair To Where? » 20 Sep 2023 09:06
Winston Biscuit he internet says this guy is bad news, yet no one seems to be able to actually say why he is bad news
by From Despair To Where? » 20 Sep 2023 09:09
Hound Did he ever actually give Haas F1 any money or was it all just a load of bollox to get his name on the car?
Seems to be more of the latter. Doubt anything much will come of it.
by Sutekh » 20 Sep 2023 09:42
Winston Biscuit he internet says this guy is bad news, yet no one seems to be able to actually say why he is bad news
by Greatwesternline » 20 Sep 2023 10:15
by blythspartan » 20 Sep 2023 10:47
Greatwesternline If they are given 25% of the club ownership they will be listed on Companies House very soon.
Below that and they might not, depends in new shares are issued or if he buys some of Dai's.
Given only a minority ownership, he wouldnt have the voting power to change anything in the club, but would get a voice in decisions.
Is he investing in the club, or the holding company, or Dai's other companies? Don't forget, RFC don't own their stadium or training ground.
Unless we are told anything out right, we will never know enough of the details. We'll never know:
What voting rights he has acquired
What buying rights he has acquired
Whether he has first refusal on subsequent share sales
Whether he has invested money for shares in the club (equity with no legal debt to the club)
Whether he has invested via loans that need to be paid back but not got any voting rights
Ask yourself this, why would someone want to give away some of their money in exchange for a minority stake in a loss making football club with massive debts to its majority owner and no assets with which to pay the owner back.
I suspect he hasnt made any investment at all and is tweeting for the sheer banter of it. He's an attention seeker who is getting attention.
by genome » 20 Sep 2023 10:49
Winston Biscuit he internet says this guy is bad news, yet no one seems to be able to actually say why he is bad news
by Winston Biscuit » 20 Sep 2023 10:50
genomeWinston Biscuit he internet says this guy is bad news, yet no one seems to be able to actually say why he is bad news
Look into his time in F1, bloke's a nutter
by Greatwesternline » 20 Sep 2023 10:51
blythspartanGreatwesternline If they are given 25% of the club ownership they will be listed on Companies House very soon.
Below that and they might not, depends in new shares are issued or if he buys some of Dai's.
Given only a minority ownership, he wouldnt have the voting power to change anything in the club, but would get a voice in decisions.
Is he investing in the club, or the holding company, or Dai's other companies? Don't forget, RFC don't own their stadium or training ground.
Unless we are told anything out right, we will never know enough of the details. We'll never know:
What voting rights he has acquired
What buying rights he has acquired
Whether he has first refusal on subsequent share sales
Whether he has invested money for shares in the club (equity with no legal debt to the club)
Whether he has invested via loans that need to be paid back but not got any voting rights
Ask yourself this, why would someone want to give away some of their money in exchange for a minority stake in a loss making football club with massive debts to its majority owner and no assets with which to pay the owner back.
I suspect he hasnt made any investment at all and is tweeting for the sheer banter of it. He's an attention seeker who is getting attention.
You may well be right, but do you not feel that some of our youngsters (if tied down to long term contracts) will become valuable assets?
by Stranded » 20 Sep 2023 10:54
Greatwesternline If they are given 25% of the club ownership they will be listed on Companies House very soon.
Below that and they might not, depends in new shares are issued or if he buys some of Dai's.
Given only a minority ownership, he wouldnt have the voting power to change anything in the club, but would get a voice in decisions.
Is he investing in the club, or the holding company, or Dai's other companies? Don't forget, RFC don't own their stadium or training ground.
Unless we are told anything out right, we will never know enough of the details. We'll never know:
What voting rights he has acquired
What buying rights he has acquired
Whether he has first refusal on subsequent share sales
Whether he has invested money for shares in the club (equity with no legal debt to the club)
Whether he has invested via loans that need to be paid back but not got any voting rights
Ask yourself this, why would someone want to give away some of their money in exchange for a minority stake in a loss making football club with massive debts to its majority owner and no assets with which to pay the owner back.
I suspect he hasnt made any investment at all and is tweeting for the sheer banter of it. He's an attention seeker who is getting attention.
by Greatwesternline » 20 Sep 2023 11:11
StrandedGreatwesternline If they are given 25% of the club ownership they will be listed on Companies House very soon.
Below that and they might not, depends in new shares are issued or if he buys some of Dai's.
Given only a minority ownership, he wouldnt have the voting power to change anything in the club, but would get a voice in decisions.
Is he investing in the club, or the holding company, or Dai's other companies? Don't forget, RFC don't own their stadium or training ground.
Unless we are told anything out right, we will never know enough of the details. We'll never know:
What voting rights he has acquired
What buying rights he has acquired
Whether he has first refusal on subsequent share sales
Whether he has invested money for shares in the club (equity with no legal debt to the club)
Whether he has invested via loans that need to be paid back but not got any voting rights
Ask yourself this, why would someone want to give away some of their money in exchange for a minority stake in a loss making football club with massive debts to its majority owner and no assets with which to pay the owner back.
I suspect he hasnt made any investment at all and is tweeting for the sheer banter of it. He's an attention seeker who is getting attention.
I keep seeing this point re the training ground and it is always wrong. As per the last accounts - the Training Ground is owned by RFC Bearwood Ltd, which is a subsidary of The Reading Football Club Limited. Unless I missed a sale since June '22, the club own the training ground.
by Snowflake Royal » 20 Sep 2023 17:51
by Lower West » 20 Sep 2023 19:27
GreatwesternlineStrandedGreatwesternline If they are given 25% of the club ownership they will be listed on Companies House very soon.
Below that and they might not, depends in new shares are issued or if he buys some of Dai's.
Given only a minority ownership, he wouldnt have the voting power to change anything in the club, but would get a voice in decisions.
Is he investing in the club, or the holding company, or Dai's other companies? Don't forget, RFC don't own their stadium or training ground.
Unless we are told anything out right, we will never know enough of the details. We'll never know:
What voting rights he has acquired
What buying rights he has acquired
Whether he has first refusal on subsequent share sales
Whether he has invested money for shares in the club (equity with no legal debt to the club)
Whether he has invested via loans that need to be paid back but not got any voting rights
Ask yourself this, why would someone want to give away some of their money in exchange for a minority stake in a loss making football club with massive debts to its majority owner and no assets with which to pay the owner back.
I suspect he hasnt made any investment at all and is tweeting for the sheer banter of it. He's an attention seeker who is getting attention.
I keep seeing this point re the training ground and it is always wrong. As per the last accounts - the Training Ground is owned by RFC Bearwood Ltd, which is a subsidary of The Reading Football Club Limited. Unless I missed a sale since June '22, the club own the training ground.
They own it, but its not a realisable asset. Its complicated. They have tangible assets of £980k.
They own 100% of the company RFC Bearwood, which does represent the training ground, but the reason why that isn't showing up as a big asset is because that company itself has debts of £38m, which wipe out the value of the stadium.
by Franchise FC » 20 Sep 2023 19:59
Sutekh Probably nothing to worry about as a judge reportedly said of Storey that he "had a tendency to make impressive statements, which on further investigation or consideration were not quite what they seemed".
by Brogue » 21 Sep 2023 07:57
Looking forward to what I can do as a club owner
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 230 guests