by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2007 09:57
by papereyes » 10 Jan 2007 10:02
Top Flight I think Federici played well, he had a good debut............
He made a number of outstanding saves.........
However, he was at fault for both Burnley goals. He was indecisive and started coming out to narrow Akinbyi's angle for a shot before retreating to make it easy for Panicbuyi to lob him! Very indecisive there.
For the second goal, he came and flapped at the cross. Looked very unsure of himself, wasn't decisive again in coming for the ball and fumbled around allowing an easy goal for Burnley once more.
I feel bad giving the lad any sort of criticism because at the end of the day, we won the game. He made a number of outstanding stops. He otherwise looked accomplished and of course it was his first team debut.
Overall, well done Federici............ Good debut but there is room for improvement. You will have to be more decisive and more confident coming for crosses from corners if you are gonna jostle with Hahnemann. You can't afford to be letting in easy goals in the Prem son.
by Hoop Blah » 10 Jan 2007 10:08
papereyesTop Flight I think Federici played well, he had a good debut............
He made a number of outstanding saves.........
However, he was at fault for both Burnley goals. He was indecisive and started coming out to narrow Akinbyi's angle for a shot before retreating to make it easy for Panicbuyi to lob him! Very indecisive there.
For the second goal, he came and flapped at the cross. Looked very unsure of himself, wasn't decisive again in coming for the ball and fumbled around allowing an easy goal for Burnley once more.
I feel bad giving the lad any sort of criticism because at the end of the day, we won the game. He made a number of outstanding stops. He otherwise looked accomplished and of course it was his first team debut.
Overall, well done Federici............ Good debut but there is room for improvement. You will have to be more decisive and more confident coming for crosses from corners if you are gonna jostle with Hahnemann. You can't afford to be letting in easy goals in the Prem son.
If I'd been in earlier, I would have posted the same. Some absolutely top saves, but, imo, communication/awareness let him down for their two goals. Certainly on the second, three Reading players went for the ball, no-one really got there and you're left with an open goal.
That said, the positives out-weigh the negatives in my opinion, as his weaker areas are things that are easily learnt and come with experience. Most keepers are good shot-stoppers, the good keepers are the ones who command their box and defence well.
by Stranded » 10 Jan 2007 10:21
by Hoop Blah » 10 Jan 2007 10:28
Stranded It's his first ever competitive game in English football unless you include his time at Maidenhead so it's hardly surprising that he made a couple of errors.
I thought his overall game was very good and you have to remember that he was playing behind a defence that have had very little time together (if any) as a unit. I would like to see him play behind our usual back four.
by weybridgewanderer » 10 Jan 2007 10:39
by Huntley & Palmer » 10 Jan 2007 10:45
Hoop BlahStranded It's his first ever competitive game in English football unless you include his time at Maidenhead so it's hardly surprising that he made a couple of errors.
I thought his overall game was very good and you have to remember that he was playing behind a defence that have had very little time together (if any) as a unit. I would like to see him play behind our usual back four.
Absolutely agree. I'm not sure a Premiership club should be gambling on such an inexperienced keeper providing backup to their first choice keeper though.
Keepers don't usually reach their peak until their late 20's, and I'd be worried if Marcus got injured or suspended and was due to miss any games, let alone a handful.
by MartinRdg » 10 Jan 2007 10:47
Stranded It's his first ever competitive game in English football unless you include his time at Maidenhead so it's hardly surprising that he made a couple of errors.
I thought his overall game was very good and you have to remember that he was playing behind a defence that have had very little time together (if any) as a unit. I would like to see him play behind our usual back four.
by papereyes » 10 Jan 2007 10:48
by Stranded » 10 Jan 2007 11:04
MartinRdgStranded It's his first ever competitive game in English football unless you include his time at Maidenhead so it's hardly surprising that he made a couple of errors.
I thought his overall game was very good and you have to remember that he was playing behind a defence that have had very little time together (if any) as a unit. I would like to see him play behind our usual back four.
And we only conceded the second after Ivar went off. Lack of leadership at the back to blame I think.
by Trigger » 10 Jan 2007 11:05
by Denver Royal » 10 Jan 2007 11:12
Trigger I don't think he's a long way from competing for the first team.
by Royalee » 10 Jan 2007 11:18
by Hoop Blah » 10 Jan 2007 11:18
Huntley & Palmer Would you prefer Stack over Federici? Coppell doesn't think so from the looks of it. I'd like to see someone come in but only short term, perhaps an experienced keeper in his early 30's on a two year contract.
by rotherwick_royal » 10 Jan 2007 11:50
by Top Flight » 10 Jan 2007 12:44
rotherwick_royal I think Federici's performance alone justified Coppell's approach to the game, he must have learned a hell of a lot about his squad last night, postives and negatives. I thought the The Fed had a great game, MOTM imo. Too many people write off our squad players when they haven't even seen them play, and I'm amazed that there are still people writing him off after last night.
Federici kept us comfortably in front early on, we conceded goals when we were cruising and making changes at the end of the game. When Ivar went off the whole back four looked uncomfortable, like they need somebody to tell them what to do. I don't think he can be blamed directly for either of the goals.
Better than Stack, and the best saves I've seen all season. Marcus should be looking over his shoulder.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 10 Jan 2007 18:55
Spirit of Elm ParkHuntley & Palmer This is the Marcus that flapped at Lampard's cross against Chelsea and was out of position for Solskjaer's goal at OT?
Quality examples, and a good comparison against Burnley
Promising 1st reflex save by the lad, made me think we could be onto one here. After all, he could have been picking the ball out of the net without touching it.
After that showed moments of class, but overall impression was that he has a long way to go, and, most importantly IMO, he is too small.
People suggesting he was MOM are getting a bit carried away IMO. For me that went to Oster, the only player in contention for a 1st team place who actually raised his game on the night. He stood out as the class act on the pitch.
by Forbury Lion » 10 Jan 2007 19:13
by doylefan » 10 Jan 2007 20:26
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot], Jammy Dodger, John Madejski's Wallet, Kev Royal, retro royal, Richard, WestYorksRoyal and 225 guests