Financial jackpot

User avatar
Uncle Andy
Member
Posts: 143
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 14:09
Location: In the Kneebreakers

by Uncle Andy » 20 Apr 2007 08:00

SpaceCruiser For the sake of comparison, what did we get for winning the Championship last season?


Promotion!

shaka's shorts
Member
Posts: 580
Joined: 04 May 2005 13:58
Location: Wokingham

by shaka's shorts » 20 Apr 2007 08:41

The UEFA Cup is not necessarily a big windfall until after the group stages. I met the Commercial Director of Rangers who told me they lost money on the UEFA Cup with very low TV money from C5, half empty stadiums and lots of travelling costs etc. Although, I suspect the Mad stad would be full even for a qualifying match with a Lithuanian team!

Once you get through to the quarters then it is very lucrative as you negotiate your own TV deal rather than the Champions League model where you share the pot at this stage.

User avatar
anR
Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:55
Location: In front of millions and then even more millions

by anR » 20 Apr 2007 09:58

shaka's shorts The UEFA Cup is not necessarily a big windfall until after the group stages. I met the Commercial Director of Rangers who told me they lost money on the UEFA Cup with very low TV money from C5, half empty stadiums and lots of travelling costs etc. Although, I suspect the Mad stad would be full even for a qualifying match with a Lithuanian team!

Once you get through to the quarters then it is very lucrative as you negotiate your own TV deal rather than the Champions League model where you share the pot at this stage.


Which brings the conundrum of do we put out reserve teams for it and risk not progressing, or risk following a weak second season a la West Ham this season after a brief Uefa Cup run, or even Leeds' financial ruin after budgetting to win the Champions League? :?

Although saying all this I do know we won't even qualify for it. I still have a bet on a top ten place, so knowing my awful luck we'll finish 11th!

User avatar
Seal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1589
Joined: 21 Oct 2004 09:36
Location: Chelsea

by Seal » 20 Apr 2007 11:10

I'm sure I read somewhere that they are changing how the prize money is distributed in Uefa Cup next season, so clubs will receive more money at an earlier stage of the season, making it more profitable to be in.

However, it pales in insignificance when compared to the Premiership prize money next season...

Premiership winners: 2005/6 - £9,740,000; 2007/8 - £50,000,000.

Premiership losers: 2005/6 - £487,000; 2007/8 - £26,800,000.

User avatar
RG30
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6002
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 20:42

by RG30 » 20 Apr 2007 11:27

Seal I'm sure I read somewhere that they are changing how the prize money is distributed in Uefa Cup next season, so clubs will receive more money at an earlier stage of the season, making it more profitable to be in.

However, it pales in insignificance when compared to the Premiership prize money next season...

Premiership winners: 2005/6 - £9,740,000; 2007/8 - £50,000,000.

Premiership losers: 2005/6 - £487,000; 2007/8 - £26,800,000.


That is correct about the UEFA Cup. The prize money for me wouldn't be the concern, it's the way the Cup operates with a premliminary qualifying round, followed by a Group stage involving 4 games before the Champions League 3rd placed sides are bought in, it's a long drawn out process.

Whilst I completely understand SC's stance on the cup, I would hope we field our best 11 for the remainder of the season (Sidwell exclueded, obvious reasons) as the higher we finish, the better financially and we have a responsibility to other teams in the league and we the fans want to win games, see the team give it 110% and finish where we deserve to be to reflect our true 38 game season, and not finish lower because we took our foot of the gas in the final 1/3 of the season.


Tinrib
Member
Posts: 394
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:53
Location: Paranoimia

by Tinrib » 26 Apr 2007 17:16

Tinrib
Dirk Gently
anR
papereyes Birmingham £19.4m
Portsmouth £18.0m

West Brom £16.9m
Sunderland £16.1m


How's that? Birmingham got £1.4m for getting relegated? :?


More TV appearances, probably.


More than likely correct..

In the 2002/03 Season TV revenue ranged from between £31m (ManU) to £13m (Sunderland)

When I get an opportunity I'll work out what we've earned through TV & Media rigts this season.



Ok - a bit later than I'd hoped, but total income via the Prem league this season will be..

£14m (From an equal split between all clubs from 50% of the total prize pool)
£5.84m assuming we finish 9th. (represents 25% of the total pot)
£507k per live game (Not sure how many we've had live this season?) but I'll guess at 6 = £3.04m (again represents 25% of the total pot assuming Sky are correct in saying that there are a total of 138 live games this season)

So around £22.8m in total..

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

by brendywendy » 26 Apr 2007 17:25

anR
shaka's shorts The UEFA Cup is not necessarily a big windfall until after the group stages. I met the Commercial Director of Rangers who told me they lost money on the UEFA Cup with very low TV money from C5, half empty stadiums and lots of travelling costs etc. Although, I suspect the Mad stad would be full even for a qualifying match with a Lithuanian team!

Once you get through to the quarters then it is very lucrative as you negotiate your own TV deal rather than the Champions League model where you share the pot at this stage.


Which brings the conundrum of do we put out reserve teams for it and risk not progressing, or risk following a weak second season a la West Ham this season after a brief Uefa Cup run, or even Leeds' financial ruin after budgetting to win the Champions League? :?

Although saying all this I do know we won't even qualify for it. I still have a bet on a top ten place, so knowing my awful luck we'll finish 11th!


cos that one game at palermo really took it out of WHU didnt it

Bowman's Quiver
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:02
Location: Henpecked

by Bowman's Quiver » 26 Apr 2007 22:42

Tinrib
Tinrib
Dirk Gently
anR
papereyes Birmingham £19.4m
Portsmouth £18.0m

West Brom £16.9m
Sunderland £16.1m


How's that? Birmingham got £1.4m for getting relegated? :?


More TV appearances, probably.


More than likely correct..

In the 2002/03 Season TV revenue ranged from between £31m (ManU) to £13m (Sunderland)

When I get an opportunity I'll work out what we've earned through TV & Media rigts this season.



Ok - a bit later than I'd hoped, but total income via the Prem league this season will be..

£14m (From an equal split between all clubs from 50% of the total prize pool)
£5.84m assuming we finish 9th. (represents 25% of the total pot)
£507k per live game (Not sure how many we've had live this season?) but I'll guess at 6 = £3.04m (again represents 25% of the total pot assuming Sky are correct in saying that there are a total of 138 live games this season)

So around £22.8m in total..


Games I can recall off the top of my head on sky and there may be more I've forgotten about:

Man City (h)
Man Utd (h)
Arsenal (h)
Chelsea (h)
Spurs (h)
Chelsea (a)
Everton (a)
Villa (h)
Charlton (a)
Newcastle (h)

That's 10 which is another 2 million plus on your calculations.

Call it 25 million for Premiership rights across the board.

Suggest another 2 million is added for the FA cup and league cup runs plus TV rights.

Perhaps 11 million for gate receipts for Premiership games.

That would be 38 million pound income without including hospitality, merchandising, sponsorship, catering and promotions.

I wonder what expenditure is?

User avatar
RG30
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6002
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 20:42

by RG30 » 26 Apr 2007 22:57

£11million on wages I think I saw somewhere recently.


User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

by Rawlie19 » 26 Apr 2007 23:13

anR
shaka's shorts The UEFA Cup is not necessarily a big windfall until after the group stages. I met the Commercial Director of Rangers who told me they lost money on the UEFA Cup with very low TV money from C5, half empty stadiums and lots of travelling costs etc. Although, I suspect the Mad stad would be full even for a qualifying match with a Lithuanian team!

Once you get through to the quarters then it is very lucrative as you negotiate your own TV deal rather than the Champions League model where you share the pot at this stage.


Which brings the conundrum of do we put out reserve teams for it and risk not progressing, or risk following a weak second season a la West Ham this season after a brief Uefa Cup run, or even Leeds' financial ruin after budgetting to win the Champions League? :?

Although saying all this I do know we won't even qualify for it. I still have a bet on a top ten place, so knowing my awful luck we'll finish 11th!


I think West Ham's position in the table has more to do with them being shit than playing 1 team in Italy early in the season.

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5882
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

by Mr Angry » 27 Apr 2007 08:36

Bowman's Quiver
Tinrib
Tinrib
Dirk Gently
anR
papereyes Birmingham £19.4m
Portsmouth £18.0m

West Brom £16.9m
Sunderland £16.1m


How's that? Birmingham got £1.4m for getting relegated? :?


More TV appearances, probably.


More than likely correct..

In the 2002/03 Season TV revenue ranged from between £31m (ManU) to £13m (Sunderland)

When I get an opportunity I'll work out what we've earned through TV & Media rigts this season.



Ok - a bit later than I'd hoped, but total income via the Prem league this season will be..

£14m (From an equal split between all clubs from 50% of the total prize pool)
£5.84m assuming we finish 9th. (represents 25% of the total pot)
£507k per live game (Not sure how many we've had live this season?) but I'll guess at 6 = £3.04m (again represents 25% of the total pot assuming Sky are correct in saying that there are a total of 138 live games this season)

So around £22.8m in total..


Games I can recall off the top of my head on sky and there may be more I've forgotten about:

Man City (h)
Man Utd (h)
Arsenal (h)
Chelsea (h)
Spurs (h)
Chelsea (a)
Everton (a)
Villa (h)
Charlton (a)
Newcastle (h)

That's 10 which is another 2 million plus on your calculations.

Call it 25 million for Premiership rights across the board.

Suggest another 2 million is added for the FA cup and league cup runs plus TV rights.

Perhaps 11 million for gate receipts for Premiership games.

That would be 38 million pound income without including hospitality, merchandising, sponsorship, catering and promotions.

I wonder what expenditure is?


Spurs (a) as well.

Behindu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1970
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 15:05

by Behindu » 27 Apr 2007 08:57

RG30 £11million on wages I think I saw somewhere recently.


That would have to be a conservative estimate surely...

Can;t be too many players not on 10k / week which is 500k / year so a squad of 22 would cost you 11 million. And we have more than 22 pros (OK the junior players won;t be on 10k week !). The likes of Doyle, Seol, Lita, Shorey will be on way more than 10k.

Then you add in Coppell, Dillon, Hammond, Downes, Gibbs etc etc etc.

Then there is all the non playing side where IIRC we employ over 100 people

Then add in all the other costs of employing people and the numbers soar !

Victor Meldrew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6716
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 19:22
Location: South Coast

by Victor Meldrew » 27 Apr 2007 11:08

All of that would have been budgeted for.
Presumably we didn't budget for such a high finish so £6million will be bunce plus extra TV Revenue of say £2million for appearing more times live than expected.
With the new higher Sky revenue and not supposedly spending our full transfer budget this season we will either spend a lot on new players or be one of the very few profitable clubs in English football.
Presumably ticket prices will also be reduced?
Oh no I forget,they have been kept at the same level (because with our limited size of ground and demand they can),significantly higher than established clubs like Bolton but not subject to a 14% increase like Man Utd.
For supporting a well-run club such as ours it's a shame we don't have profit sharing for members. :wink:


User avatar
WTRoyal
Member
Posts: 311
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 11:23
Location: Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

by WTRoyal » 27 Apr 2007 11:09

Behindu
RG30 £11million on wages I think I saw somewhere recently.


That would have to be a conservative estimate surely...

Can;t be too many players not on 10k / week which is 500k / year so a squad of 22 would cost you 11 million. And we have more than 22 pros (OK the junior players won;t be on 10k week !). The likes of Doyle, Seol, Lita, Shorey will be on way more than 10k.

Then you add in Coppell, Dillon, Hammond, Downes, Gibbs etc etc etc.

Then there is all the non playing side where IIRC we employ over 100 people

Then add in all the other costs of employing people and the numbers soar !


I have a vague memory of an article on the official site which quoted Mr Madjeski as saying the wage bill alone for RFC was £20 million. I'll have a look and see if I can dig it out.

Bowman's Quiver
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:02
Location: Henpecked

by Bowman's Quiver » 27 Apr 2007 11:12

Behindu
RG30 £11million on wages I think I saw somewhere recently.


That would have to be a conservative estimate surely...

Can;t be too many players not on 10k / week which is 500k / year so a squad of 22 would cost you 11 million. And we have more than 22 pros (OK the junior players won;t be on 10k week !). The likes of Doyle, Seol, Lita, Shorey will be on way more than 10k.

Then you add in Coppell, Dillon, Hammond, Downes, Gibbs etc etc etc.

Then there is all the non playing side where IIRC we employ over 100 people

Then add in all the other costs of employing people and the numbers soar !


Bonus' will have mounted up a fair bit this season as well but I would have thought 18 million would still cover all playing and coaching staff including the costs of running the academy.

Another 7 million should adequately cover all other operating costs including non-playing staff working at the stadium, travelling expenses and policing.

That's 25 million pound accounted for but still leaves anything up to another 20 million pound to play with.

On the other hand I could be way out :lol:

Good fun having a guess though....

Victor Meldrew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6716
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 19:22
Location: South Coast

by Victor Meldrew » 27 Apr 2007 11:15

On a similar tack did you see in today's paper what the backroom staff get at Chelsea?
The fitness coach gets £600,000 and the goalkeeping coach gets £400,000.
I know London rates for salaries are higher than elsewhere but.......nice work if you can get it .
Mind you Cech has been the best keeper and they are a very fit side so maybe it's money well spent.
Don't let Mr Mad see those figures or he'll have an immediate coronary.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 27 Apr 2007 12:15

Don't we normally release our accounts this time of year, maybe JM's still telling the tax man he's losing millions each year with the club!!

Tinrib
Member
Posts: 394
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:53
Location: Paranoimia

by Tinrib » 27 Apr 2007 12:32

Year Wages/Turnover ratio Employees
2004/5 92.8 335
2003/4 60.4 391
2002/3 69.2 308
2001/2 77.7 319
2000/1 91.7 319


Interesting comparative figures % for wages to turnover for past seasons..

Will be nice to see what they are for this season..

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 8852
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

by Forbury Lion » 27 Apr 2007 13:58

Steve Coppell was on Sky Sports News the other night talking about the gap between the big clubs and anyone else, He said the financial divide started when they allowed home clubs to keep the gate.

User avatar
URZZZZZZZZ
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1906
Joined: 07 May 2004 20:27
Location: Long knocks it back in.............IT'S READING WHO TAKE A MASSIVE STEP TOWARDS WEMBLEY!!

by URZZZZZZZZ » 27 Apr 2007 14:16

Finish 8th or above and we can lend West Ham £5.5 mill for their wrong doings :lol:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 288 guests

It is currently 12 Jul 2024 01:45