Good Old Kits

[M Brook]

Lucky he lives in Shinfield then. He can jog to the Mad Stad or get the Shire Hall park n ride on matchdays (having had a pint or two in the Black Boy!).

[Gunny Fishcake]

Silly sod ! He's definately not got a brain yet alone intelligence if he can't be arsed to get a taxi with the money he's on .

[The whole year inn]

Who cares?

[Norfolk Royal]

I'm intrigued to find out how an alleged drink drive offence relates in any way to recent public statements Kitson.

[Coppelled Streets]

It does appear to be true.......Dave's not quite so intelligent after all.

Sainsbury's finest!

[2.8 lita injection]

Dave Kitson is my role model, i will now get drunk and drive my car as i dont tend to think for myself.

[Alan Partridge]

Who cares?

I'm sure the life police who have condemend Lita will. Or is it one rule for one?

[Royalwaster]

You guys astound me - OK, it was a silly thing to do. But none of us know the facts. How much had he drunk? Was he speeding? Was he driving erratically?

Are you guys saying that you have never driven when you may have been over the limit? I have ... I'm not proud of it ... but I've done it. And I know people in all walks of life who do it regularly - some of them are very intelligent.

[Fat Leather Jacket]

Silly oxf*rd, everywhere.

[Norfolk Royal]

Maybe he didn't have a drink at all. TVP saw it as a trohpy nick cos he had the name on the side of the car and DK got the hump over it. That's the hopeful version.

[Tamworth_Royal]

Banging on about a moralistic world etc.. and then gets arrested for drink driving with a court appearance next friday.

What a world, still, i bet not too many want his contract ripped up like they did Lita's.

Welcome back Tredder !

I think Kitson should be sent out to QPR on loan....... They will look after him

http://qprreport.blogspot.com/2007/12/q ... derby.html

[PEARCEY]

Why does anyone think whether someone drink drives is related to their intelligence in any way?

Kitson was a shelf stacker FFS, not a nuclear scientist.

Yes but he comes across as articulate (compared to most other footballers)...thats why he appears to be a bit more intelligent than most of his counter-parts.

[crossie]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

[moo]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

Tell me your joking...

[PEARCEY]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

Well why didn't he give a test if he had nothing to hide? I know about innocent until proven guilty but in cases like this its hard to see how he is going to be found not guilty m'lud.

[crossie]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

Tell me your joking...

I'm joking

[crossie]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

Well why didn't he give a test if he had nothing to hide? I know about innocent until proven guilty but in cases like this its hard to see how he is going to be found not guilty m'lud.

you know what he's like. he was probably REALLY offended that they stopped him....or maybe they called him a Ginga.

[Norfolk Royal]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

He never took a test so you're right to say he didn't fail it. In the eyes of the law that is the same in seriousness as drink driving though.

Also, there are several reasons why someone wouldn't take a test, prime example being that they are too bladdered to actually do it.

That wouldn't appear to be the case in this instance though as he faces a further charge of failing to co-operate. It will be up to Dave to say why he didn't co-operate.

There looks more to this than meets the eye.

[PEARCEY]

But it says that he has been charged with 'failing to provide a breath sample and failing to co-operate in providing a sample.'

Doesn't say he failed it.

He never took a test so you're right to say he didn't fail it. In the eyes of the law that is the same in seriousness as drink driving though.

Also, there are several reasons why someone wouldn't take a test, prime example being that they are too bladdered to actually do it.

That wouldn't appear to be the case in this instance though as he faces a further charge of failing to co-operate. It will be up to Dave to say why he didn't co-operate.

There looks more to this than meets the eye.

There looks like more to this than meets the gall bladder more likely.

[Hahnemann's Hairdresser]

If you refuse to take a breath test (provide a sample) it is assumed you are over the limit, and you are warned that this is the case. A breath test takes 5 mins at most, it is far, far less hassle to co-operate with the police than to kick up a fuss and refuse to take a test because you've got the hump. Less than 2 weeks ago he said he'd rather be called a 'human' a 'footballer', I think the large majority of humans would have taken the test in that sitution.