
by Ian Royal » 29 Jan 2009 12:32
by seahawk10 » 29 Jan 2009 17:03
bigshaka'away' i agree but i hate the bloody double negative headline for the thread.
by Gus the teenage cow » 29 Jan 2009 17:07
by TNR » 29 Jan 2009 17:14
Gus the teenage cow good thread this
by Schards#2 » 31 Jan 2009 21:11
by AthleticoSpizz » 31 Jan 2009 21:37
and that is an obvious fact, that only an imbecile couldn't see.Schards#2 The only reason we are second is because everyone else in this division is even worse. We are a poor team, far worse than the 106 side, far worse than the side that finished 8th in the prem and worse than the one that got relegated.
by Rex » 31 Jan 2009 21:39
by AthleticoSpizz » 31 Jan 2009 21:45
yes...what's the questionroyalexile Why would we want players 'not good enough' playing for us next season.
by Rex » 31 Jan 2009 21:48
by AthleticoSpizz » 31 Jan 2009 21:51
by Rex » 31 Jan 2009 22:06
by Hampshire Royal » 31 Jan 2009 22:08
by AthleticoSpizz » 31 Jan 2009 22:15
ok (unless we spare the boredom for the other poor souls on here, and do it on PM maybe?)royalexile Yep understood that. Still do not understand the reasoning behind an under performing premiership player begging to play for us next season. The premiership seperates the wheat from the chaff, as a team we are aiming to push forwards not go backwards. Therefore why accept less. Oh and the LOL also applied to us last season. Please feel free to expand on your rationale as this is a discussion board.
by Rex » 31 Jan 2009 22:29
by Ian Royal » 31 Jan 2009 22:31
Schards#2 We are a poor team, far worse than the 106 side, far worse than the side that finished 8th in the prem and worse than the one that got relegated.
Progress? Maybe from the other side of an ocean, but not in the flesh i'm afraid.
by Ian Royal » 31 Jan 2009 22:36
royalexile I agree with some of the points made there. It does totally depend on a revisionist attitude by JM and the next manager though. We need a huge cash injection in this club which i hope JM has already put by. Certain players within our team have the premier experience (good or bad) and this is still dependant on us reaching the premier. I am still of the opinion that IF we go up the team needs stripping down, new blood bought in gradually and again blending the team to reach a level where we can stay in the premier and build on it.
This season we will be losing Harps and Shunt, and we might still have enough to get up this season. It's already been mentioned that the team might not be experienced or strong enough tactically to deal with certain teams within the Premiership, but the blend of experience, pay structure and imported players next season could be telling. I still expect caution which is not always a bad ethic to have.
by Rex » 31 Jan 2009 22:56
by Royal With Cheese » 31 Jan 2009 23:30
Schards#2 I'm sure from a few thousand miles away today's effort was entertaining and inspiring, however, from 6 yards away it was dull, uninspiring and woeful as have been many recent games.
The only reason we are second is because everyone else in this division is even worse. We are a poor team, far worse than the 106 side, far worse than the side that finished 8th in the prem and worse than the one that got relegated.
Progress? Maybe from the other side of an ocean, but not in the flesh i'm afraid.
by seahawk10 » 31 Jan 2009 23:37
Schards#2 I'm sure from a few thousand miles away today's effort was entertaining and inspiring, however, from 6 yards away it was dull, uninspiring and woeful as have been many recent games.
The only reason we are second is because everyone else in this division is even worse. We are a poor team, far worse than the 106 side, far worse than the side that finished 8th in the prem and worse than the one that got relegated.
Progress? Maybe from the other side of an ocean, but not in the flesh i'm afraid.
by Ian Royal » 01 Feb 2009 00:34
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Fox Talbot and 350 guests