SC hasn't a clue.

311 posts
Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Royalee » 14 Apr 2009 16:12

Royal_Belly I wouldn't have a clue either who to pick from the bunch of over hyped and over paid bunch of players we have at the mo! Hardly any of them are worthy of a first team place!


Why the f*ck sign them then?

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Royalee » 14 Apr 2009 16:14

And while we're on the subject of money, any manager refusing to sell the most overrated player in a club's history for ten times his asking price before putting him on £25k a week wouldn't have the right to complain even if he didn't have any budget (although Coppell has gone on record several times to say he has).

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20174
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Stranded » 14 Apr 2009 16:21

Interesting quotes from Roy Hodgson recently which I guess almost sums up what we are seeing from some people now...

'I should be anti things like qualifying for Europe because if you over-achieve people don't accept it's an over-achievement,' Hodgson told the media. 'At Blackburn I took over a team that had survived by one point in the Premiership and, with exactly the same players, I took them to a European spot.

'It succeeded in getting me the sack because expectations rose enormously and, when we weren't in the top six the next year, they decided to get someone else in.'

boy1985

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by boy1985 » 14 Apr 2009 16:21

Royalee And while we're on the subject of money, any manager refusing to sell the most overrated player in a club's history for ten times his asking price before putting him on £25k a week wouldn't have the right to complain even if he didn't have any budget (although Coppell has gone on record several times to say he has).


no-one bid for him :|

User avatar
Royal_Belly
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 15:26
Location: Y25

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Royal_Belly » 14 Apr 2009 16:24

Royalee
Royal_Belly I wouldn't have a clue either who to pick from the bunch of over hyped and over paid bunch of players we have at the mo! Hardly any of them are worthy of a first team place!


Why the f*ck sign them then?


Because they haven't always been playing as bad as this have they??!!! Those of us who go and watch the games know that the majority of the team can play better then what they all are at the moment. It just seems that the second half of the season something within the team has gone wrong - Coppell has tried to change it but *shock horror* he is getting slated for it, just like he gets slated if he sticks with the same team!


Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Terminal Boardom » 14 Apr 2009 16:25

Stranded Interesting quotes from Roy Hodgson recently which I guess almost sums up what we are seeing from some people now...

'I should be anti things like qualifying for Europe because if you over-achieve people don't accept it's an over-achievement,' Hodgson told the media. 'At Blackburn I took over a team that had survived by one point in the Premiership and, with exactly the same players, I took them to a European spot.

'It succeeded in getting me the sack because expectations rose enormously and, when we weren't in the top six the next year, they decided to get someone else in.'


At last some common sense prevails. I agree completely with RH's quotes. This is not fantasy football.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Woodcote Royal » 14 Apr 2009 16:26

Stranded Interesting quotes from Roy Hodgson recently which I guess almost sums up what we are seeing from some people now...

'I should be anti things like qualifying for Europe because if you over-achieve people don't accept it's an over-achievement,' Hodgson told the media. 'At Blackburn I took over a team that had survived by one point in the Premiership and, with exactly the same players, I took them to a European spot.

'It succeeded in getting me the sack because expectations rose enormously and, when we weren't in the top six the next year, they decided to get someone else in.'


Or, Fulham were doomed until they signed Hodgson but look where they are now and what happened to a similarly placed team from Berkshire who kept their under achieving manager for another 2 seasons.

User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by cmonurz » 14 Apr 2009 16:30

YOU CAN'T CRITISIZE COPELL WE WOZ PROMOTED TO THE PREMIER LEAGUE!!!! ALWAYS A LE-GEND, SIR STEVE! HE CAN DO NO RONG!

boy1985

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by boy1985 » 14 Apr 2009 16:32

cmonurz YOU CAN'T CRITISIZE COPELL WE WOZ PROMOTED TO THE PREMIER LEAGUE!!!! ALWAYS A LE-GEND, SIR STEVE! HE CAN DO NO RONG!


CRINGEEEE


rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by rhroyal » 14 Apr 2009 16:36

The players clearly don't care. With the team changing they must know that one good performance and a win will secure them the shirt yet they clearly can't be bothered.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Woodcote Royal » 14 Apr 2009 16:37

Royal_Belly
Royalee
Royal_Belly I wouldn't have a clue either who to pick from the bunch of over hyped and over paid bunch of players we have at the mo! Hardly any of them are worthy of a first team place!


Why the f*ck sign them then?


Because they haven't always been playing as bad as this have they??!!! Those of us who go and watch the games know that the majority of the team can play better then what they all are at the moment. It just seems that the second half of the season something within the team has gone wrong - Coppell has tried to change it but *shock horror* he is getting slated for it, just like he gets slated if he sticks with the same team!


Yep, shock horror!!! Manager gets slated for THIRD new year meltdown in FIVE years :|

But it was all down to three different squads of players who turned cr@p as they finished off the Christmas turkey and nothing to do with the bloke who managed all these players.

Life is such a bowl of cherries in Coppelland :mrgreen:

User avatar
Vision
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5114
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 20:53

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Vision » 14 Apr 2009 16:42

Royalee And while we're on the subject of money, any manager refusing to sell the most overrated player in a club's history for ten times his asking price before putting him on £25k a week wouldn't have the right to complain even if he didn't have any budget (although Coppell has gone on record several times to say he has).


LOL. 10 times the "asking price"? Go on I'll humour you please explain.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6527
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by PieEater » 14 Apr 2009 16:46

Some of the excuses Coppell is coming out with this season are a joke:

- Playing away after international breaks. The message to the players is it's OK to lose
- Too many games so close together. It's the same for everyone (and I didn't notice Sheff U players tiring)
- Ball boys
- The wind gave them problems yesterday (there wasn't any)

etc


boy1985

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by boy1985 » 14 Apr 2009 16:50

PieEater Some of the excuses Coppell is coming out with this season are a joke:

- Playing away after international breaks. The message to the players is it's OK to lose
- Too many games so close together. It's the same for everyone (and I didn't notice Sheff U players tiring)
- Ball boys
- The wind gave them problems yesterday (there wasn't any)

etc


yeah can you believe it! a manager trying to take the pressure off his players and not blame them in the press. whatever next!


maybe what he says in the press is a bit different to what he says to the players?

User avatar
Royal_Belly
Member
Posts: 149
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 15:26
Location: Y25

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Royal_Belly » 14 Apr 2009 16:51

Royalee Why the f*ck sign them then?


Because they haven't always been playing as bad as this have they??!!! Those of us who go and watch the games know that the majority of the team can play better then what they all are at the moment. It just seems that the second half of the season something within the team has gone wrong - Coppell has tried to change it but *shock horror* he is getting slated for it, just like he gets slated if he sticks with the same team![/quote]

Yep, shock horror!!! Manager gets slated for THIRD new year meltdown in FIVE years :|

But it was all down to three different squads of players who turned cr@p as they finished off the Christmas turkey and nothing to do with the bloke who managed all these players.

Life is such a bowl of cherries in Coppelland :mrgreen:[/quote]

If you are so anti Coppell why even bother supporting his team week in week out then?? It must be a real drag having to come on here and moan about him and his team etc every week - watching Reading must not be fun for you!!! My god the abuse the likes of TB1 and TB2 must've got from you!

Anywho the majority of the team who promoted us to the Premiership are still playing for Reading fc are they not?!!

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20174
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Stranded » 14 Apr 2009 16:52

Woodcote Royal
Stranded Interesting quotes from Roy Hodgson recently which I guess almost sums up what we are seeing from some people now...

'I should be anti things like qualifying for Europe because if you over-achieve people don't accept it's an over-achievement,' Hodgson told the media. 'At Blackburn I took over a team that had survived by one point in the Premiership and, with exactly the same players, I took them to a European spot.

'It succeeded in getting me the sack because expectations rose enormously and, when we weren't in the top six the next year, they decided to get someone else in.'


Or, Fulham were doomed until they signed Hodgson but look where they are now and what happened to a similarly placed team from Berkshire who kept their under achieving manager for another 2 seasons.


Or as is the most likely scenario, we had one excellent season in this division which exceeded everyone's expectations then rather than flirting with relegation the first year up, we again exceeded expectations. Now after a year where we were narrowly relegated, yes following mistakes by all parties, we are likely to be in the play-offs.

Now, I'm not saying it's been great this year and a change may be due but, honestly, if we hadn't overacheived that first year in the Prem, then I'd wager that there'd be nowhere near the amount of anti-Coppell vitriol at the moment.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Hoop Blah » 14 Apr 2009 16:57

The success of those two seasons has made a rod for his own back but it still doesn't hide the fact that we've seen a number of costly mistakes over the two seasons since that have put us in the position we're now in.

I wouldn't expect us to be challenging for Europe every season, I wouldn't even expect us to be challenging for auto promotion out of this league every season, but what I do expect is to see the club trying everything it can to win every game it plays and get the best out of the resources we have.

We did that for a couple of seasons undefr Coppell, then we rested on our laurels and the whole ethos of the club seemed to change. We've paid the price for that.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by brendywendy » 14 Apr 2009 17:13

boy1985
cmonurz YOU CAN'T CRITISIZE COPELL WE WOZ PROMOTED TO THE PREMIER LEAGUE!!!! ALWAYS A LE-GEND, SIR STEVE! HE CAN DO NO RONG!


CRINGEEEE



whooooosh?

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by brendywendy » 14 Apr 2009 17:16

Woodcote Royal
Royal_Belly
Royalee Why the f*ck sign them then?


Because they haven't always been playing as bad as this have they??!!! Those of us who go and watch the games know that the majority of the team can play better then what they all are at the moment. It just seems that the second half of the season something within the team has gone wrong - Coppell has tried to change it but *shock horror* he is getting slated for it, just like he gets slated if he sticks with the same team!


Yep, shock horror!!! Manager gets slated for THIRD new year meltdown in FIVE years :|

But it was all down to three different squads of players who turned cr@p as they finished off the Christmas turkey and nothing to do with the bloke who managed all these players.

Life is such a bowl of cherries in Coppelland :mrgreen:



so in woodcote and royalee world(not a world i ever wish to visit)
has coppell somehow changed his management style and team set up and tactics after xmas in those three seasons?
no, he still does the same things, his attitude is the same, his motivational techniques dont suddenly change after the turkey either do they?!

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: SC hasn't a clue.

by Woodcote Royal » 14 Apr 2009 17:16

Stranded
Or as is the most likely scenario, we had one excellent season in this division which exceeded everyone's expectations then rather than flirting with relegation the first year up, we again exceeded expectations. Now after a year where we were narrowly relegated, yes following mistakes by all parties, we are likely to be in the play-offs.

Now, I'm not saying it's been great this year and a change may be due but, honestly, if we hadn't overacheived that first year in the Prem, then I'd wager that there'd be nowhere near the amount of anti-Coppell vitriol at the moment.


A lot of the anti Coppell stuff now is in response to those who want to blame anyone but him for the last 2 seasons.

Of course our 2 best seasons were huge over achievements but no more than the last 2 have been under achievements.

We should not have been relegated and with a squad only marginally weakened from the drop, we have become a very average championship side.

It's a bit like someone in the current government trying to blame the pre 97 Tory's for things that are not right now.

Teams like Blackpool are run on a comparitive shoe string and yet they made Steve Coppell's team, picked from Steve Coppell's squad, look no better than them.

He's the manager, it's his squad and if they don't want to play for him (or,more likely, have lost faith in him, like I have) Steve Coppell has to take responsibility for that.
Last edited by Woodcote Royal on 14 Apr 2009 17:33, edited 2 times in total.

311 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], From Despair To Where?, karbota and 269 guests

It is currently 05 Oct 2024 21:28