by Alan Partridge » 03 Jun 2009 14:56
Harry Carry This will be your cup final.
I can't wait for;-
the 'divers' chant
The score cards
'What a waste of money'
'Cheats'
'Hunt is gonna get ya'
Predicktable.
by who are ya? » 03 Jun 2009 14:56
Harry Carry the 'divers' chant
by Focher » 03 Jun 2009 14:59
Alan PartridgeHarry Carry This will be your cup final.
I can't wait for;-
the 'divers' chant
The score cards
'What a waste of money'
'Cheats'
'Hunt is gonna get ya'
Predicktable.
Didcot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chelsea
and by a long way.
by Alan Partridge » 03 Jun 2009 15:03
Harry CarryAlan PartridgeHarry Carry This will be your cup final.
I can't wait for;-
the 'divers' chant
The score cards
'What a waste of money'
'Cheats'
'Hunt is gonna get ya'
Predicktable.
Didcot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chelsea
and by a long way.
Don't think there is much in it distance wise m8. oh....
by Stranded » 03 Jun 2009 15:09
handbags_harrisSarah Starhandbags_harris Couldn't have chosen a worse club IMO. This is the first time in years that I have considered not going to the pre-season main event. It's even worse than last season when, 6 and 7 months after being soundly beaten by them in the league, we get Villa as our "prestigious" main pre-season event. How to add insult to injury.
Who were you hoping for, out of interest?
Anyone BUT Chelsea.
I'd like to see us going back to having relatively big names in European football coming to the Madejski. Surely it wouldn't be too much to ask a team like, say, Atletico Madrid, PSV, Fiorentina etc to come to the Madejski. We did it with Feyenoord, why not some others?
by handbags_harris » 03 Jun 2009 15:37
Stranded One word - cost.
Most "name" European clubs want a fee to come and play a friendly esp if the opposition are not in the top flight - it's one of the reasons the Celtic game got pulled.
Chelsea probably won't want much of a fee, it's a low cost friendly for them being so close but will offer them the right sort of test whilst pushing our guys the week before the season - not necessarily the club I'd have gone for but as a friendly it does make perfect sense.
by Stranded » 03 Jun 2009 16:14
by loyalroyal4life » 03 Jun 2009 16:16
boy1985Royaleeloyalroyal4life
royalee are you content with rodgers being appointed?
Yep.
Could this not have been done by PM?
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Jun 2009 16:45
Silver Fox Fortunately I'll be on holiday then
by Hampshire Royal » 03 Jun 2009 17:08
by Elliott » 03 Jun 2009 17:11
Hampshire Royal Chance to see Kaka maybe?????....
by Hampshire Royal » 03 Jun 2009 17:12
by The Cap » 03 Jun 2009 21:13
Stranded wrote:
this part of the world has a very large proportion of Chelsea fans which means more £££ through the gate for a glorified training session.
by handbags_harris » 03 Jun 2009 21:28
Harry Carry LOL at handbags harris. Poor attempt that one!
by earleyroyal » 03 Jun 2009 21:41
by Alivey » 03 Jun 2009 22:28
earleyroyal Pretty disappointed with playing this lot in a friendly really, just out of principle. They represent absolutely everything wrong with football - ridiculous sums of money distorting competition and a set of players who neatly sum up where the human race goes wrong.
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Franconian Royal, From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot], Orion1871, Owlish52, Royal Ginger and 255 guests