by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 15:36
by glass half full » 11 Aug 2010 15:38
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 11 Aug 2010 15:44
Royal Rother From the Deloitte review of PL finances 2008...
Reading: The most drastic wage increase in the Premier League was recorded by Reading, who hiked their wage bill by 109 per cent between 2005 and 2007. They also spent £11 million on their stadium and facilities.
Yes, but where's all the cash gone....?
by Yellowcoat » 11 Aug 2010 15:45
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 15:53
Who Moved The Goalposts?Royal Rother From the Deloitte review of PL finances 2008...
Reading: The most drastic wage increase in the Premier League was recorded by Reading, who hiked their wage bill by 109 per cent between 2005 and 2007. They also spent £11 million on their stadium and facilities.
Yes, but where's all the cash gone....?
Did we really spend £11m on the stadium and facilities? I remember the media center cost around 2m but that was the second/relegation season. We spent on the training ground (new pitch and better standard buildings) but as we rent this off JM and did not purchase outright, £11m seems way too much. What else did we do?
by rob the royal » 11 Aug 2010 15:54
brendywendyrob the royal So we've gone from a club that makes a 6 million loss every year but can afford to spend a million or two on transfers every year to a club that is balancing the books and will have to sell a star player to fill any gaps that the Academy can't fill. Surely the only way for a club like that to go is down?
before sjm was willing to pay those losses for us. now he isnt.
if you know of anyone who likes reading, and has 6 million quid to throw away every year, forever, please let it be known to him that he should step up and buy the club
by rob the royal » 11 Aug 2010 15:59
brendywendy actually it just shows that at this level we will never make a profit.moving us to the madstad, and steadily improving the season ticket sales/fan base/club profile, has helped make us way more viable than when jm took us over, playing in a cowshed(albeit a lovely one)with gates of 5-8k a week. jm payed for the stadium, and we repay in loans competetively priced, thats fair enough to me.
and until someone arrives who is willing to fund the losses, we will do well to stay here.
but then we know that the club is/has always been a small one, and i accept that we have no devine right to championship football, let alone premiere league football.
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:01
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 11 Aug 2010 16:02
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:03
rob the royalbrendywendy actually it just shows that at this level we will never make a profit.moving us to the madstad, and steadily improving the season ticket sales/fan base/club profile, has helped make us way more viable than when jm took us over, playing in a cowshed(albeit a lovely one)with gates of 5-8k a week. jm payed for the stadium, and we repay in loans competetively priced, thats fair enough to me.
and until someone arrives who is willing to fund the losses, we will do well to stay here.
but then we know that the club is/has always been a small one, and i accept that we have no devine right to championship football, let alone premiere league football.
This is the one. I agree. So what I'm saying is why does he continually talk rubbish about having Premiership ambition for the club when the reality is as you say we will do well to even stay in this division in the future... maybe if he stopped spouting his rubbish about how ambitious we are people like royalee would get used to the fact that we are a now back to being a pretty small club albeit with a fancy stadium and a bit more of a reputation than we had before...
by ZacNaloen » 11 Aug 2010 16:05
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:05
DOYLERSAROYALER Chairman bleats on about getting to premiership and how strong our squad is...but lets be honest...its not that strong compared to some of the other teams in Championship...its a good squad that will see us comfortable in this division , but certainly not as good as Chairman thinks ie. better than most
We've got some good players, with maybe a handful of very good players...but that isnt going to get us promotion...so the sooner the hierarchy realise that the better
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Aug 2010 16:06
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:11
by andrew1957 » 11 Aug 2010 16:16
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:17
ZacNaloen With a few exceptions we've mostly just released them at the end of their contracts if they don't make the grade at our level.
We really need to start selling our academy products to make money.
hopefully we'll be able to sell one of our many goalkeepers for a tidy sum soon.
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2010 16:19
andrew1957 The problem with this debate is that some think that we should become Portsmouth and that Sir John should spend tens of millions - whereas others think we should have no ambition at all.
Surely there needs to be some balance as this might well be the last season for the foreseeable future when we have a realistic chance of promotion without SIGNIFICANT investment. This season a small amount of investment might just be enough. Personally I would be happy with the addition of just one more quality CB. I think we have enough up front. The mythical 20 goal a season striker is largely an illusion. In the Championship the only striker who achieved that last season was Nicky Maynard and Church, Long, Hunt and Rasiak are amongst the strongest striking forces in the division.
If we fall short because we are not good enough at the back this season, however, then we will almost certainly have to sell Church, Sig, Kebe, McAnuff etc and I very much doubt their replacements will be as good.
£400-£500K for a loan this year is a small risk and even if it fails we will recoup the money fromn player sales anyway.
I will be very surprised if we did not find this problem dealt with by 1st September. If Sir John does not do so and we start to struggle then crowds will fall and it will cost him even more money in the long run - so it is in his interest to make sure we are challenging at the top.
by rob the royal » 11 Aug 2010 16:20
brendywendy and it is possible to want to go up, and not want to pay for it at the same time
not only that, but he has an example of where it has worked before - ie the <5 million it cost to assemble the entire record breaking 106 point team.
but yeah, i wish hed shut up too.
brendywendy said: the disappointment stems from the people who hear that and think it means he will happily throw money down the drain
by under the tin » 11 Aug 2010 16:26
rob the royal
But isn't that the point - not only is he not willing to pay for those sort of losses - but now he'll even restrict the budget so it's so tight you have to scrape around for free transfers... or sell your best players to fund any squad building. The club is going nowhere - or worse - if things carry on like this we might end up flirting with relegation in a couple of seasons when Gylfi and McAnuff and Kebe get fed up with the club's lack of ambition and move on (not saying it's going to happen - just as you can't rule out having a decent season this year even with a small squad with weak defensive depth).
by Ferris » 11 Aug 2010 16:30
under the tin thrust
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998, From Despair To Where?, Hove Royal, John Madejski's Wallet, Richard, Sutekh and 236 guests