creative_username_1ManchesterRoyals
No but were playing better under Adkins
are we? Didn't appear that way in the two previous games
Well BM couldnt get them to play like they did today all season
by ManchesterRoyals » 13 Apr 2013 20:11
creative_username_1ManchesterRoyals
No but were playing better under Adkins
are we? Didn't appear that way in the two previous games
by 72 bus » 13 Apr 2013 20:39
creative_username_1ManchesterRoyals
No but were playing better under Adkins
are we? Didn't appear that way in the two previous games
by royal_cornwall » 13 Apr 2013 20:50
ManchesterRoyalsroyal_cornwall The only player we need to make sure stays out of that lot is Mccarthy. I wouldnt be too bothered whoever else moved on.
Thats a bit harsh
by creative_username_1 » 13 Apr 2013 20:59
72 buscreative_username_1ManchesterRoyals
No but were playing better under Adkins
are we? Didn't appear that way in the two previous games
It did if you actually know anything about football, I take it you did not bother going today ?
by Ian Royal » 13 Apr 2013 21:40
by AbovetheI » 14 Apr 2013 09:29
GreaterTorontoRoyal ANOTHER FLARE BY LIVERPOOL!
Two so far
Goal line clearance by Gunter
by LoyalRoyal22 » 14 Apr 2013 09:38
by ZacNaloen » 14 Apr 2013 09:40
Ian Royal 1st 30 against Saints was some of the best football we've played this season. Likewise large parts of the second half today. We've got a legacy of crapness to shift, but there are positive signs. It's too little too late almost certainly, but plenty to be positive about for next season.
by windermere_royal » 14 Apr 2013 09:51
by Ian Royal » 14 Apr 2013 13:03
ZacNaloenIan Royal 1st 30 against Saints was some of the best football we've played this season. Likewise large parts of the second half today. We've got a legacy of crapness to shift, but there are positive signs. It's too little too late almost certainly, but plenty to be positive about for next season.
They came out in the second half and looked so confident, it wasn't until Morrisons injury that Liverpool really came back into the game
by windermere_royal » 14 Apr 2013 13:06
by Maguire » 14 Apr 2013 13:11
windermere_royal It`s still work in progress, still very early days but it there is marked improvement in the way we move the ball. I for one am really excited about he future under Adkins
by Snowball » 14 Apr 2013 13:13
by Ian Royal » 14 Apr 2013 13:16
Maguirewindermere_royal It`s still work in progress, still very early days but it there is marked improvement in the way we move the ball. I for one am really excited about he future under Adkins
There really isn't though. We couldn't put two passes together for the entire first half.
I realise you have your own agenda but try not to just see what you want to see.
by West Stand Man » 14 Apr 2013 13:18
royal_cornwall
Fair Enough add Carrico and Guthrie to that.
by wingnut » 14 Apr 2013 13:54
windermere_royal we seemed to come under pressure late in the game after Pogs ability to hold up the ball was withdrawn from the game. a little surprised by that substitution to say the least.
by ZacNaloen » 14 Apr 2013 13:56
wingnutwindermere_royal we seemed to come under pressure late in the game after Pogs ability to hold up the ball was withdrawn from the game. a little surprised by that substitution to say the least.
It wasn't just the substitution, it was a change in shape, too, at least when Alf came on. Blackman was out wide with just Alf up front and Jobi just behind. With that, we lost the ability to pressure their goal at all and we're holding on by the end.
by Uke » 14 Apr 2013 15:34
ZacNaloenwingnutwindermere_royal we seemed to come under pressure late in the game after Pogs ability to hold up the ball was withdrawn from the game. a little surprised by that substitution to say the least.
It wasn't just the substitution, it was a change in shape, too, at least when Alf came on. Blackman was out wide with just Alf up front and Jobi just behind. With that, we lost the ability to pressure their goal at all and we're holding on by the end.
We came under all that pressure because of Morrisons injury meaning we couldn't defend effectively. Nothing more to it.
by SCIAG » 14 Apr 2013 15:46
UkeZacNaloen We came under all that pressure because of Morrisons injury meaning we couldn't defend effectively. Nothing more to it.
The score line would suggest that we were able to defend effectively
Perhaps not AS effectively; but we were still effective
by Man Friday » 14 Apr 2013 15:48
ZacNaloenwingnutwindermere_royal we seemed to come under pressure late in the game after Pogs ability to hold up the ball was withdrawn from the game. a little surprised by that substitution to say the least.
It wasn't just the substitution, it was a change in shape, too, at least when Alf came on. Blackman was out wide with just Alf up front and Jobi just behind. With that, we lost the ability to pressure their goal at all and we're holding on by the end.
We came under all that pressure because of Morrisons injury meaning we couldn't defend effectively. Nothing more to it.
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Royals and Racers and 754 guests