by Norfolk Royal » 04 Apr 2023 13:18
by windermereROYAL » 04 Apr 2023 13:21
by Elm Park Kid » 04 Apr 2023 13:27
by Orion1871 » 04 Apr 2023 13:37
by Mid Sussex Royal » 04 Apr 2023 13:43
Norfolk Royal So if we could have shifted Ejaria, Puscas, Moore, even one of them maybe, we could have been compliant? Difficult not to draw that conclusion.
by Hound » 04 Apr 2023 13:44
by windermereROYAL » 04 Apr 2023 13:50
by Mid Sussex Royal » 04 Apr 2023 13:55
windermereROYAL Very impressive statement from Bowen, the club have spoken, that`s all we asked.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 04 Apr 2023 13:57
windermereROYAL Been teetering on the brink of relegation in 5 of the last 6 seasons, why should this year be any different? it will certainly make the next 7 games interesting.
Lets see if they have the balls for a survival scrap.
WARNING.
Stay away from twitter today, it`s a fucking minefield.
by Stranded » 04 Apr 2023 13:57
by The Royal Forester » 04 Apr 2023 13:59
Hound Well confirmed but still not clear exactly what we did wrong. Proper fcuking annoying weve had so many restrictions and still managed to break the plan.
Club statement kind of suggests they think they’ve done everything reasonable to stick by the plan
At least it is the end of it this summer. What a painful few years
by Dirk Gently » 04 Apr 2023 14:00
The Royal ForesterHound Well confirmed but still not clear exactly what we did wrong. Proper fcuking annoying weve had so many restrictions and still managed to break the plan.
Club statement kind of suggests they think they’ve done everything reasonable to stick by the plan
At least it is the end of it this summer. What a painful few years
Reading Mark Bowen's and the club's statements, it seems to me we got this 6 points docked for not selling any/enough players. It seems that we agreed to sell some players within the "business plan", but were not able to. How the EFL expected us to sell crooked (Moore) or players not up to the required standard (insert your favourite names here). After all any player can refuse to move and is entitled to stay where he is overpaid and not go to a club which will pay him less.
by genome » 04 Apr 2023 14:03
by Stranded » 04 Apr 2023 14:04
Dirk GentlyThe Royal ForesterHound Well confirmed but still not clear exactly what we did wrong. Proper fcuking annoying weve had so many restrictions and still managed to break the plan.
Club statement kind of suggests they think they’ve done everything reasonable to stick by the plan
At least it is the end of it this summer. What a painful few years
Reading Mark Bowen's and the club's statements, it seems to me we got this 6 points docked for not selling any/enough players. It seems that we agreed to sell some players within the "business plan", but were not able to. How the EFL expected us to sell crooked (Moore) or players not up to the required standard (insert your favourite names here). After all any player can refuse to move and is entitled to stay where he is overpaid and not go to a club which will pay him less.
One word : Puscas.
We were banking on selling him.
We didn't sell him.
End of.
But still, -6 last year and -6 this year is much better than the alternative, which would have been -12 last year in one go and definite relegation.
by Stranded » 04 Apr 2023 14:10
by The Royal Forester » 04 Apr 2023 14:13
Dirk GentlyThe Royal ForesterHound Well confirmed but still not clear exactly what we did wrong. Proper fcuking annoying weve had so many restrictions and still managed to break the plan.
Club statement kind of suggests they think they’ve done everything reasonable to stick by the plan
At least it is the end of it this summer. What a painful few years
Reading Mark Bowen's and the club's statements, it seems to me we got this 6 points docked for not selling any/enough players. It seems that we agreed to sell some players within the "business plan", but were not able to. How the EFL expected us to sell crooked (Moore) or players not up to the required standard (insert your favourite names here). After all any player can refuse to move and is entitled to stay where he is overpaid and not go to a club which will pay him less.
One word : Puscas.
We were banking on selling him.
We may have been banking on selling Puscas, but could (maybe he did) refuse to leave for a lower wage though.
We didn't sell him.
End of.
But still, -6 last year and -6 this year is much better than the alternative, which would have been -12 last year in one go and definite relegation.
by The Royal Forester » 04 Apr 2023 14:18
by genome » 04 Apr 2023 14:18
by Zammo » 04 Apr 2023 14:27
genome That's a terrific letter from Bowen, very open and honest.
by Winston Biscuit » 04 Apr 2023 14:33
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Vision and 277 guests