by PEARCEY » 25 Aug 2009 19:18
by Ian Royal » 25 Aug 2009 19:23
PEARCEY That might be true Ian but we have off-loaded a lot of players pre-season and Bikey as well so with a much thinner pay-roll and significant transfer income its not unreasonable for fans to expect some of that to be ploughed back into new signings.
by PEARCEY » 25 Aug 2009 19:29
Ian RoyalPEARCEY That might be true Ian but we have off-loaded a lot of players pre-season and Bikey as well so with a much thinner pay-roll and significant transfer income its not unreasonable for fans to expect some of that to be ploughed back into new signings.
Of course not, my point being that it is happening. Not as well as most would like obviously. I'm certainly not particularly impressed with the whole Tommy Smith saga and general lack of incoming players I think most of us would agree we need.
But as I've said, we've already spent a similar amount to previous season's total spending on one player. And we still have several days of one window and another one in January to go...
You've also got to take into account that the incoming transfer money isn't just sloshing around waiting to be spent. The club doesn't have money sitting around doing nothing. It has loans and debts which eat up all of that money easily.
by Ian Royal » 25 Aug 2009 19:37
by FiNeRaIn » 25 Aug 2009 22:14
by southstand67 » 25 Aug 2009 22:15
by Platypuss » 25 Aug 2009 22:16
by clauski » 25 Aug 2009 22:19
by PEARCEY » 25 Aug 2009 22:20
Platypuss The only redeeming feature about this thread is its ability to out the morons.
by FiNeRaIn » 25 Aug 2009 22:21
by Man Friday » 25 Aug 2009 22:59
by The whole year inn » 26 Aug 2009 10:33
by Royal Rother » 26 Aug 2009 11:44
by Alan Partridge » 26 Aug 2009 11:53
Royal Rother Or we could have got Darren Ferguson or Roy Keane perhaps, both managing teams below us in the table.
All clubs need balls and patience sometimes. Peterborough's players, who have come up with the team, face the same challenges as our youngsters. It takes time to adapt and learn.
by Dorset-Knob » 26 Aug 2009 11:58
The whole year inn RFC paid 800k for Rodgers
we could have got Tisdale for less than half that. I'm sure he would have bought Moxey with him too, for a combined fee of less than what we paid for a manager with 20 games experience
by weybridgewanderer » 26 Aug 2009 12:02
Royal Rother Or we could have got Darren Ferguson or Roy Keane perhaps, both managing teams below us in the table.
by Royal Rother » 26 Aug 2009 12:53
by AF1 » 26 Aug 2009 12:58
by Archie's penalty » 26 Aug 2009 13:25
by The whole year inn » 26 Aug 2009 19:57
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Clyde1998, Crusader Royal, Google [Bot], Hendo, Jinx, Orion1871, rabidbee, Snowflake Royal and 1441 guests