Scutterbucketz Indeed. Weren't the Thais the ones providing financial security rather than selling our most expensive assets?
I think this is more one of those situations where we could choose to sell him now or he'd be off for free in summer.
by Royal Ginger » 29 Aug 2014 20:57
Scutterbucketz Indeed. Weren't the Thais the ones providing financial security rather than selling our most expensive assets?
by Royal Ginger » 29 Aug 2014 20:58
leww_rfc What's the fee being rumoured?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 29 Aug 2014 21:08
by howser » 29 Aug 2014 21:12
by Y21 » 29 Aug 2014 21:47
by Libertine » 29 Aug 2014 21:48
by maffff » 29 Aug 2014 21:57
Oilroyalwindermere_royalakranes "With Alex having entered the final year of his contract here in Berkshire, the initial deal is a good one for Reading Football Club and we also have significant financial protection moving forward."
This quote would indicate add ons if he should move on with his career . but doesn`t this undisclosed fee shit piss you off?
Well now we have sold 3 players and netted something like 10m . how much of this money will go out again before Monday night?
my guess is f*ck all
Slightly more as most people forget we also sold Daniel Carrico (Sevilla, £1.5m)
by Libertine » 29 Aug 2014 21:58
by akranes » 29 Aug 2014 22:03
Libertine Or s the sale still on and £3m to our new owners represents "financial protection"? That would be even more alarming than the sale being off, or a big insult to our new supposedly wealthy Thai owners...
by Royal Ginger » 29 Aug 2014 22:09
by Y21 » 29 Aug 2014 22:50
Libertine The thing that bothers me, and it appears some others here, is the "financial security" portion of the statement by the club. Did I miss something? Is the sale to the Thais off?
by melonhead » 29 Aug 2014 22:57
by TBM » 29 Aug 2014 22:58
by maffff » 29 Aug 2014 23:22
Royal Ginger It's widely considered that Le Fondre was used to pay a bill, Carrico's loan agreement reputedly had the option to buy in it, Morrison was too good an offer to turn down for an average defender and McCarthy was going free at the end of the season if we didn't cash in now. Other than maybe Morrison at a stretch, i don't see how our new owners (who indeed don't even own the club yet) could have really had any influence on this.
by Libertine » 29 Aug 2014 23:34
akranesLibertine Or s the sale still on and £3m to our new owners represents "financial protection"? That would be even more alarming than the sale being off, or a big insult to our new supposedly wealthy Thai owners...
Yeah it is quite worrying. I'm just hoping Adkins is letting them leave so he can completely reconstruct his own team, however with each player leaving, each time he sounds slightly dissapointed. Fairly sure we won't sign anyone before the window shuts too.
by Libertine » 29 Aug 2014 23:36
Y21Libertine The thing that bothers me, and it appears some others here, is the "financial security" portion of the statement by the club. Did I miss something? Is the sale to the Thais off?
IMHO, this is just a badly phrased way of suggesting that we have numerous addons that ensure we aren't going to be missing out when QPR sell him on for 20 mill in a year or two.
by bcubed » 29 Aug 2014 23:51
melonhead Lol at anyone saying Feds was number one anyway
Only because we knew Mccarthy was Off
by loyalroyal4life » 30 Aug 2014 00:13
by clauski » 30 Aug 2014 00:20
by sandman » 30 Aug 2014 00:23
Users browsing this forum: Ark Royal, Biscuit goalie, From Despair To Where?, Rax and 1109 guests