Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

278 posts
It Is What It Is
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 15:14
Location: Oxfordshire, Born in Atlanta.

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by It Is What It Is » 15 Aug 2009 21:50


User avatar
The whole year inn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 2474
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:49
Location: Fred West >>>> Brendan Rodgers

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by The whole year inn » 15 Aug 2009 22:41

I dont remember seeing a game where Reading were so utterly void of ideas..

0 chances created in two full games now, both opposition goalkeepers have barely touched the ball. That is incredibly worrying :|

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 29845
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by leon » 15 Aug 2009 22:55

It's quite simple - Rodgers has replaced the spine of the team, the replacements are young and inexperienced, and we haven't got the players for the system we're playing.

The team could mature and adapt quickly, and Rodgers could use from the squad/buy some experience- I hope so - otherwise we're f*cked, quite simply.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 14:35

Just seen the "highlights" on the IPlayer.

Defending was woeful. Cisse following up an impressive defensive performance with a poor one by the looks of it. Whereas against Forest Rosenior was poor going forward but good at the back, he looked shocking at the back against Newcastle.

How on earth do you fail to mark Newcastle's "name" striker on at least 4 occasions with balls coming into the box. I realise I've only seen a tiny snapshot of the game, but we looked all over the place.

Going forward looked exactly the same as v Forest. Nowhere near enough bodies attacking. If the ball comes from the left the right forward has to be getting in the box and vice versa. At the moment it looks like only Davies trying to get forward.

This is at least a big warning that we need some changes to what we're currently doing if we want to realise the promise of these players and the system.

At least we have the likes of Hunt, Harper & Mills to come in to the team to give it a bit more experience and quality.

Oh and that was never a penalty in a million years.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:01

He jumped with both arms in the air - the ball hit his arm - of course it was a penalty.


User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by FiNeRaIn » 16 Aug 2009 15:02

LOL Agree with all of that other than the point about the penalty, an obvious pen by any stretch. He nearly caught the ball.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:04

Ball to hand, not intentional and didn't look like it would fall to the Newcastle player even if it hadn't hit him.

It's also impossible to jump and head with your arms at your sides. Totally unneccessary penalty IMO.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:06

It's possible to jum for a ball without having both arms up as high as his were. It was a def penalty - hence no argument from Long at the time. Still, at least he jumped for it I suppose.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:08

Royal Lady It's possible to jum for a ball without having both arms up as high as his were. It was a def penalty - hence no argument from Long at the time. Still, at least he jumped for it I suppose.


What's the point in arguing? It hit his arm and had been given. And the team and Long did protest. But about as half-heartedly as they seemed to have played.


User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:09

I was arguing your point that it wasn't a penalty "in a million years". It was.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by ZacNaloen » 16 Aug 2009 15:10

It is possible but you don't nearly as high, it's harsh because he wasn't reaching for it. He just cocked up his jump.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:10

Royal Lady I was arguing your point that it wasn't a penalty "in a million years". It was.


I know exactly what you were doing.
You think. I disagree.

User avatar
PremAddict
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1118
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 15:56
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by PremAddict » 16 Aug 2009 15:11

Saw the match on TV and "rewound" several times. Haven't read any post on this thread.

Started lively but Newcastle were by far better with the ball and better "getting it back" as BR would say. Lots of passing...to the keeper. I don't think I've ever seen so many passes go backwards into the box. Ever.

Once the goal was scored, it appeared there was a propensity to bypass the midfield and send it up the middle. This was disappointing but the midfield was not doing very well.

Kebe is really good on the ball, woeful with keeping it. Jem wasn't very good today. Didn't see much of Tabb but when I did, we did respectibly. Davies sent some really good passes but sent just as many to the opposition.

Long and Church were just not "visible". Feds - great distribution. Completely opposite of Marcus (and Marcus would've missed both headed-in goals too).

Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.

Cisse did adequately but I kept wondering why our $2M centerback was left on the bench. Alex did well. Bertrand was pretty good going forward and got back - decent pace but he wasn't tested a whole lot in my opinion as Rosey left them a nice path down his side.

I realize that even without the "star players", Newcastle is likely to be one of the strongest teams (especially at home) we'll face this season. Even so, I kept thinking that if we don't get Marek in there, get some good quality goal production, and sort out the right flank, we're mid-table fodder at best. Still, nice seeing all the youth out there.


Plymouth_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1143
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 13:53
Location: Location, Location.

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Plymouth_Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:23

PremAddict Saw the match on TV and "rewound" several times. Haven't read any post on this thread.

Started lively but Newcastle were by far better with the ball and better "getting it back" as BR would say. Lots of passing...to the keeper. I don't think I've ever seen so many passes go backwards into the box. Ever.

Once the goal was scored, it appeared there was a propensity to bypass the midfield and send it up the middle. This was disappointing but the midfield was not doing very well.

Kebe is really good on the ball, woeful with keeping it. Jem wasn't very good today. Didn't see much of Tabb but when I did, we did respectibly. Davies sent some really good passes but sent just as many to the opposition.

Long and Church were just not "visible". Feds - great distribution. Completely opposite of Marcus (and Marcus would've missed both headed-in goals too).

Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.

Cisse did adequately but I kept wondering why our $2M centerback was left on the bench. Alex did well. Bertrand was pretty good going forward and got back - decent pace but he wasn't tested a whole lot in my opinion as Rosey left them a nice path down his side.

I realize that even without the "star players", Newcastle is likely to be one of the strongest teams (especially at home) we'll face this season. Even so, I kept thinking that if we don't get Marek in there, get some good quality goal production, and sort out the right flank, we're mid-table fodder at best. Still, nice seeing all the youth out there.


LOL, some of this is bullocks.

Karacan had a very good game. He did start a bit slowly but as the game progressed, so did he. Mills hasn't played many games pre-season and obviously not trained with us for that long, so it would have been harsh to drop pearce or cisse after their performances against forest. Rosey wasn't great, but he saved us a lot with his well timed tackles just inside the box.

readingbedding
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4396
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 21:10
Location: cutting them all away for four runs

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by readingbedding » 16 Aug 2009 16:13

Smith kicked Karacan out of the game, not that I'm blaming Smith, if the Ref don't see it, or doesn't want to see it, it's not Smith's problem.

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Arch » 16 Aug 2009 16:14

PremAddict Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.
In Rosenior's defence, Gutierrez and Enrique teamed up to turn Rosenior inside out on several occasions, but he didn't get much help from Church. Interestingly we were less exposed down their left and more on the other side in the second half.

I've heard a few criticisms of Cisse, but I thought he did fine. He wasn't out of place for either of their open field goals, and was pretty tenacious all day. Also generally patient and careful on the ball. I have a soft spot for the guy, so I'd be open to hearing more critical views.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Alan Partridge » 16 Aug 2009 19:28

Plymouth_Royal
PremAddict Saw the match on TV and "rewound" several times. Haven't read any post on this thread.

Started lively but Newcastle were by far better with the ball and better "getting it back" as BR would say. Lots of passing...to the keeper. I don't think I've ever seen so many passes go backwards into the box. Ever.

Once the goal was scored, it appeared there was a propensity to bypass the midfield and send it up the middle. This was disappointing but the midfield was not doing very well.

Kebe is really good on the ball, woeful with keeping it. Jem wasn't very good today. Didn't see much of Tabb but when I did, we did respectibly. Davies sent some really good passes but sent just as many to the opposition.

Long and Church were just not "visible". Feds - great distribution. Completely opposite of Marcus (and Marcus would've missed both headed-in goals too).

Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.

Cisse did adequately but I kept wondering why our $2M centerback was left on the bench. Alex did well. Bertrand was pretty good going forward and got back - decent pace but he wasn't tested a whole lot in my opinion as Rosey left them a nice path down his side.

I realize that even without the "star players", Newcastle is likely to be one of the strongest teams (especially at home) we'll face this season. Even so, I kept thinking that if we don't get Marek in there, get some good quality goal production, and sort out the right flank, we're mid-table fodder at best. Still, nice seeing all the youth out there.


LOL, some of this is bullocks.

Karacan had a very good game. He did start a bit slowly but as the game progressed, so did he. Mills hasn't played many games pre-season and obviously not trained with us for that long, so it would have been harsh to drop pearce or cisse after their performances against forest. Rosey wasn't great, but he saved us a lot with his well timed tackles just inside the box.


Have to agree, in my opinion that is a mince review. Karacan was one of the very few players to come out of that having really earned his wages. Up against a very good midfield oposition he worked tirelessly for the team and took a few whacks in the process.

It seems Pearce will be the next one for Woodcote's list of 'untouchables' He was too busy berating everyone else while nolan retrieved the ball got it back for his pal to cross and then Pearce's man was helping himself to his 2nd unchallenged headed goal of the day. Woeful defending to be fair. I think Pearce will be an excellent player in time but that 2nd goal was dismal. If Doobs had done that the board would have crashed, of course he'd have never done that in the first place! :P

old woman
Member
Posts: 354
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 17:38

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by old woman » 16 Aug 2009 22:49

readingbedding Smith kicked Karacan out of the game, not that I'm blaming Smith, if the Ref don't see it, or doesn't want to see it, it's not Smith's problem.

Ref totally bottled the situation. Having booked him for the first tackle he should have booked him for the second and sent him off -not given him a telling off. Once they realised that he wouldn't take any action Newcastle bullied the referee and the linesmen.It was obvious the crowd intimidated the officials- If boot had been on the other foot a Reading player would have been off.

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Huntley & Palmer » 17 Aug 2009 11:25

There is one thing I am struggling to get my head round, we have a £2 million pound central defender on the bench and a defensive midfielder/centre back in Cisse playing next to Pearce. If our midfield was lacking bite and this was obvious from the get go, why didn't we move Cisse into midfield and put Mills at centre back. Surely he would also have handled Ameobi better too?

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Newcastle V Reading Match Thread

by Alan Partridge » 17 Aug 2009 11:38

Huntley & Palmer There is one thing I am struggling to get my head round, we have a £2 million pound central defender on the bench and a defensive midfielder/centre back in Cisse playing next to Pearce. If our midfield was lacking bite and this was obvious from the get go, why didn't we move Cisse into midfield and put Mills at centre back. Surely he would also have handled Ameobi better too?


The only explanation was that we had just kept a clean sheet comfortably against Forest and it may have been harsh to alter the defense.This is the excuse that Rodgers needed to bring Mills in, my flabber will be gasted if he doesn't start Tuesday.

278 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 320 guests

It is currently 05 Jul 2024 01:53