soggy biscuit http://www.kneejerkreactionanyone?.com
/:

by It Is What It Is » 15 Aug 2009 21:50
by The whole year inn » 15 Aug 2009 22:41
by leon » 15 Aug 2009 22:55
by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 14:35
by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:01
by FiNeRaIn » 16 Aug 2009 15:02
by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:04
by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:06
by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:08
Royal Lady It's possible to jum for a ball without having both arms up as high as his were. It was a def penalty - hence no argument from Long at the time. Still, at least he jumped for it I suppose.
by Royal Lady » 16 Aug 2009 15:09
by ZacNaloen » 16 Aug 2009 15:10
by Ian Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:10
Royal Lady I was arguing your point that it wasn't a penalty "in a million years". It was.
by PremAddict » 16 Aug 2009 15:11
by Plymouth_Royal » 16 Aug 2009 15:23
PremAddict Saw the match on TV and "rewound" several times. Haven't read any post on this thread.
Started lively but Newcastle were by far better with the ball and better "getting it back" as BR would say. Lots of passing...to the keeper. I don't think I've ever seen so many passes go backwards into the box. Ever.
Once the goal was scored, it appeared there was a propensity to bypass the midfield and send it up the middle. This was disappointing but the midfield was not doing very well.
Kebe is really good on the ball, woeful with keeping it. Jem wasn't very good today. Didn't see much of Tabb but when I did, we did respectibly. Davies sent some really good passes but sent just as many to the opposition.
Long and Church were just not "visible". Feds - great distribution. Completely opposite of Marcus (and Marcus would've missed both headed-in goals too).
Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.
Cisse did adequately but I kept wondering why our $2M centerback was left on the bench. Alex did well. Bertrand was pretty good going forward and got back - decent pace but he wasn't tested a whole lot in my opinion as Rosey left them a nice path down his side.
I realize that even without the "star players", Newcastle is likely to be one of the strongest teams (especially at home) we'll face this season. Even so, I kept thinking that if we don't get Marek in there, get some good quality goal production, and sort out the right flank, we're mid-table fodder at best. Still, nice seeing all the youth out there.
by readingbedding » 16 Aug 2009 16:13
by Arch » 16 Aug 2009 16:14
In Rosenior's defence, Gutierrez and Enrique teamed up to turn Rosenior inside out on several occasions, but he didn't get much help from Church. Interestingly we were less exposed down their left and more on the other side in the second half.PremAddict Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.
by Alan Partridge » 16 Aug 2009 19:28
Plymouth_RoyalPremAddict Saw the match on TV and "rewound" several times. Haven't read any post on this thread.
Started lively but Newcastle were by far better with the ball and better "getting it back" as BR would say. Lots of passing...to the keeper. I don't think I've ever seen so many passes go backwards into the box. Ever.
Once the goal was scored, it appeared there was a propensity to bypass the midfield and send it up the middle. This was disappointing but the midfield was not doing very well.
Kebe is really good on the ball, woeful with keeping it. Jem wasn't very good today. Didn't see much of Tabb but when I did, we did respectibly. Davies sent some really good passes but sent just as many to the opposition.
Long and Church were just not "visible". Feds - great distribution. Completely opposite of Marcus (and Marcus would've missed both headed-in goals too).
Magpies made mincemeat down their left side with Guttierez and company time after time just bulldozing over Rosey. He was poor.
Cisse did adequately but I kept wondering why our $2M centerback was left on the bench. Alex did well. Bertrand was pretty good going forward and got back - decent pace but he wasn't tested a whole lot in my opinion as Rosey left them a nice path down his side.
I realize that even without the "star players", Newcastle is likely to be one of the strongest teams (especially at home) we'll face this season. Even so, I kept thinking that if we don't get Marek in there, get some good quality goal production, and sort out the right flank, we're mid-table fodder at best. Still, nice seeing all the youth out there.
LOL, some of this is bullocks.
Karacan had a very good game. He did start a bit slowly but as the game progressed, so did he. Mills hasn't played many games pre-season and obviously not trained with us for that long, so it would have been harsh to drop pearce or cisse after their performances against forest. Rosey wasn't great, but he saved us a lot with his well timed tackles just inside the box.
by old woman » 16 Aug 2009 22:49
readingbedding Smith kicked Karacan out of the game, not that I'm blaming Smith, if the Ref don't see it, or doesn't want to see it, it's not Smith's problem.
by Huntley & Palmer » 17 Aug 2009 11:25
by Alan Partridge » 17 Aug 2009 11:38
Huntley & Palmer There is one thing I am struggling to get my head round, we have a £2 million pound central defender on the bench and a defensive midfielder/centre back in Cisse playing next to Pearce. If our midfield was lacking bite and this was obvious from the get go, why didn't we move Cisse into midfield and put Mills at centre back. Surely he would also have handled Ameobi better too?
Users browsing this forum: aeljao, Biscuit goalie, Fluff, From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot], Jinx, rabidbee, Snowflake Royal, Sutekh, tidus_mi2, UpThePrem, WestYorksRoyal, Who Moved The Goalposts?, windermereROYAL and 350 guests