CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6852 posts
User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 28658
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Green » 16 Mar 2024 20:23

Webster750 If new ownership does occur, can we please not only remove Dai Yongge but also discard the notion that new developments don't warrant new threads?

Currently, discussions on the potential ownership change are scattered across three threads, perhaps even more, because people are hesitant to create a dedicated thread for today (and any day’s) news.

This isn't beneficial for anyone, and it would be better to consolidate discussions for clarity and efficiency. One of my biggest gripes with HNA, TBH.

What are your other gripes, Webster?

Let it all out.

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11698
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Franchise FC » 16 Mar 2024 20:25

Elm Park Kid
windermereROYAL Several posts on twitter, mostly seeing one and copying it, saying it`s a done deal, I paid particular interest to the directors box today and Mark Bowen was a lonely figure sitting in the front row on his own.
Now if we were on the verge of an imminent takeover to would expect some of them to be here watching our games.


My (non twitter sources) tell me that yes, it is basically done. Might even be announced on Monday. But .. .. . there's still time for Dai to oxf*rd it all up.

Still time for Dai . .. . worst Bond film ever!

It’ll happen for Dai another day

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 20:28

windermereROYAL Several posts on twitter, mostly seeing one and copying it, saying it`s a done deal, I paid particular interest to the directors box today and Mark Bowen was a lonely figure sitting in the front row on his own.
Now if we were on the verge of an imminent takeover to would expect some of them to be here watching our games.

Bowen may be nervous that his position is under threat. Marc Bircham has a lot of football experience in this country and will presumably lead football operations.

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2860
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 16 Mar 2024 20:42

WestYorksRoyal
windermereROYAL Several posts on twitter, mostly seeing one and copying it, saying it`s a done deal, I paid particular interest to the directors box today and Mark Bowen was a lonely figure sitting in the front row on his own.
Now if we were on the verge of an imminent takeover to would expect some of them to be here watching our games.

Bowen may be nervous that his position is under threat. Marc Bircham has a lot of football experience in this country and will presumably lead football operations.

I wouldn't have thought so. He joined them last month (well, they didn't exist before last month) as Director and Head of Business Development, which sounds a very different role to actually running the football side of a football club.

User avatar
72 bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2303
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 11:01

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by 72 bus » 16 Mar 2024 20:51

WestYorksRoyal
tmesis
Winston Biscuit If its these sports.com people then maybe a documentary is on the way

You'd hope so. It would be nice to have something on their channel beyond clips you can probably see for free on youtube.

I'm waiting until we know the full story, but hopefully we get more information on their funding as it doesn't look like an organisation flushed with money. Presumably the EFL will need to see this and Howe will have been able to check too. Though AZ and Samuelson tricked everyone.


You don't need to be flushed with money to sustain a L1 club, Wycombe manage to challenge for top six most seasons with a 5000 gate and no academy.
https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/leag ... ttendances


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 20:58

72 bus
WestYorksRoyal
tmesis You'd hope so. It would be nice to have something on their channel beyond clips you can probably see for free on youtube.

I'm waiting until we know the full story, but hopefully we get more information on their funding as it doesn't look like an organisation flushed with money. Presumably the EFL will need to see this and Howe will have been able to check too. Though AZ and Samuelson tricked everyone.


You don't need to be flushed with money to sustain a L1 club, Wycombe manage to challenge for top six most seasons with a 5000 gate and no academy.
https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/leag ... ttendances

I've just been burned too much. AZ, Dais. Unfortunately you often see a cycle of bad owners until the right one finally turns up. It's happened in places like Bolton, Wigan, Portsmouth and Bury.

If these guys have modest resources but can make us a competitive L1 club with players who fight for the badge, it's a massive yes from me. I don't think I'll ever take simply having a team I enjoy watching for granted again, and that'll do just fine even if we're not hitting previous heights. We just don't know anything about them though.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 44358
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 21:06

Webster750 If new ownership does occur, can we please not only remove Dai Yongge but also discard the notion that new developments don't warrant new threads?

Currently, discussions on the potential ownership change are scattered across three threads, perhaps even more, because people are hesitant to create a dedicated thread for today (and any day’s) news.

This isn't beneficial for anyone, and it would be better to consolidate discussions for clarity and efficiency. One of my biggest gripes with HNA, TBH.

This feels a weird one. We should have more threads to discuss things because the current issues are being discussed across multiple threads and its confusing? Isn't that contradictory?

Anyone can set up a new thread at any time, and if people like it, they'll use it.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20412
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 16 Mar 2024 21:52

Rumour building that something may happen tonight!

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 22:10

If you thought Reading FC Twitterspace was insufferable for the Wilder affair, that's just a taste of what's coming this week.


User avatar
72 bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2303
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 11:01

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by 72 bus » 16 Mar 2024 22:27

Stranded Rumour building that something may happen tonight!


Where ?

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18619
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Pepe the Horseman » 16 Mar 2024 23:08

Dunno what's worse, people believing these obvious bs accounts, or the people posting this shit on the off chance they can be first to break the news. People are so emotionally invested in this it's out of order stringing them along just try and appear itk.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8502
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 16 Mar 2024 23:55

Almost nobody knew anything a day ago, now the whole fucking world know the deals going through during the week, what a load of total shit, makes me sick because lots of fans are taking it in.
Not saying there`s nothing in the pipeline though because Earnshaw and SSN were onto it, highly doubtful something will happen imminently though.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 17 Mar 2024 08:30

From what's been reported, most of it is agreed and with a reliable party you'd be confident, but there is still time for Dai to ruin it because he's a oxf*rd. And loads of "ITK" accounts are being premature so they can say they were first with it, when they're probably all speculating anyway.

Well I hope it still happens and they can claim their fake credit. A bunch of idiots but bigger things at stake.


User avatar
St Pauli
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27209
Joined: 22 Sep 2006 14:17
Location: Vote Brogue for Mod!

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by St Pauli » 17 Mar 2024 09:04

Winston Biscuit If its these sports.com people then maybe a documentary is on the way


Not sure that Reading quite has the same emotional and cultural pull emotionally internationally as Wrexham does.

’This club is all about community and heritage. The fan base, consisting in large part of IT consultants from the Berkshire section of the M4 corridor, holds a minutes silence every year to commemorate the passing of two of their own fans, who were cut down in their prime at the age of 59, suffering back injuries caused by inadequate office chairs. Both fans made a full recovery after two weeks of ill health absence on full pay and a phased return to work.’

User avatar
St Pauli
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27209
Joined: 22 Sep 2006 14:17
Location: Vote Brogue for Mod!

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by St Pauli » 17 Mar 2024 09:07

Snowflake Royal
Webster750 If new ownership does occur, can we please not only remove Dai Yongge but also discard the notion that new developments don't warrant new threads?

Currently, discussions on the potential ownership change are scattered across three threads, perhaps even more, because people are hesitant to create a dedicated thread for today (and any day’s) news.

This isn't beneficial for anyone, and it would be better to consolidate discussions for clarity and efficiency. One of my biggest gripes with HNA, TBH.

This feels a weird one. We should have more threads to discuss things because the current issues are being discussed across multiple threads and its confusing? Isn't that contradictory?

Anyone can set up a new thread at any time, and if people like it, they'll use it.


Get rid of the stickies imo.

Looks like Brogue set up a load of stickies as his legacy, knowing he was gonna check out soon.

User avatar
Reading4eva
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2124
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 23:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Reading4eva » 17 Mar 2024 09:55

Uke
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money.


If it’s profitable why would you need owners with money to keep it afloat


The problem is an academy is profitable based on clubs wanting the assets that are produced here OR the club doing that well that the assets take the club back to the Premier League.

The second seems a bit off at the moment but the first is possible.

However in a market where I think we are going to have a crash with FFP regulations a mess at the Prem level I don't think much money will be getting bounded about. It means running with what you have or bringing through your own. Could have arguments for both, may make Reading very successful or if the right talent doesn't come through, not successful at all.

I'd like it to continue mainly as it is Eamonn Dolan's legacy.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 17 Mar 2024 10:00

If exclusivity is announced this week, can somebody explain how much comfort it provides us? Can Dai still ruin everything with no financial penalty? I thought it was when contracts were exchanged that we're over the line. Plus nobody has discussed the EFL approval process. It feels like this has plenty to run.

I've seen people discussing a scenario where the sale happens and then Wokingham Borough Council block the Bearwood deal. This would be objectively hilarious, and I wouldn't put it past Dai and Pang to be stupid enough. But it falls down on the idea that the club can be sold in a couple of weeks.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11523
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 17 Mar 2024 10:44

How people are online still bemuses me.

If you were in a pub and some random guy came up to you and said oh by the way mate the Reading FC sale is a done deal news next week and walked off you’d think nothing of it.

If some people read on X some random guy saying oh by the way the Reading sale is a done deal news next week then it’s time to tell everyone and believe it

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37332
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Winston Biscuit » 17 Mar 2024 10:52

SouthDownsRoyal How people are online still bemuses me.

If you were in a pub and some random guy came up to you and said oh by the way mate the Reading FC sale is a done deal news next week and walked off you’d think nothing of it.

If some people read on X some random guy saying oh by the way the Reading sale is a done deal news next week then it’s time to tell everyone and believe it


Agreed. Not a huge user of X, formally known as twitter, but our potential takeover story really has emphasised what absolute nonsense it is.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6592
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by PieEater » 17 Mar 2024 10:55

Reading4eva
Uke
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money.


If it’s profitable why would you need owners with money to keep it afloat


The problem is an academy is profitable based on clubs wanting the assets that are produced here OR the club doing that well that the assets take the club back to the Premier League.

The second seems a bit off at the moment but the first is possible.

However in a market where I think we are going to have a crash with FFP regulations a mess at the Prem level I don't think much money will be getting bounded about. It means running with what you have or bringing through your own. Could have arguments for both, may make Reading very successful or if the right talent doesn't come through, not successful at all.

I'd like it to continue mainly as it is Eamonn Dolan's legacy.


I think part of the downfall is that the talent nurtured in the academy get agents, these agents insert release clauses or stop their client signing professional contracts, so the talent goes on the cheap or for free- but with a hefty sign on bonus for the player and agent. They're undermining the process.

Player who are any good these days expect to earn millions at an early age.

6852 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 173 guests

It is currently 18 Feb 2025 00:45