AthleticoSpizz Ian will be proven right
Is there any chance you stop obsessing about me and contribute something of value occasionally.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Aug 2020 00:06
AthleticoSpizz Ian will be proven right
by fred sharpes nose » 30 Aug 2020 00:08
Elm Park Kid My feeling is that fans are moving from anger towards apathy. I've seen a few posts on here trying to defend the decision, but at the end of the day it's just another wild stab in the dark, hoping it works out. What's the old saying - fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Anyone who believes that this is in anyway a positive move deserves to be upset when it all comes crashing down.
As fans, I guess we just take the long view and hope that this ends with administration and new stable ownership as a League 1/2 club, rather than liquidation.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Aug 2020 00:10
CountryRoyal Not sure if I’ve missed it - how are we pronouncing his name?
by tmesis » 30 Aug 2020 00:26
Elm Park Kid My feeling is that fans are moving from anger towards apathy. I've seen a few posts on here trying to defend the decision, but at the end of the day it's just another wild stab in the dark, hoping it works out. What's the old saying - fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Anyone who believes that this is in anyway a positive move deserves to be upset when it all comes crashing down.
As fans, I guess we just take the long view and hope that this ends with administration and new stable ownership as a League 1/2 club, rather than liquidation.
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 01:56
Snowflake RoyalCountryRoyal Not sure if I’ve missed it - how are we pronouncing his name?
Sakt-bahy Dih-sem-ber
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 02:10
Elm Park Kid My feeling is that fans are moving from anger towards apathy. .
by Pepe the Horseman » 30 Aug 2020 10:06
royalp-weSutekhLower West Perhaps Bowen is going to walk. Given the treatment he has received. Hence the lack of communication from the club.
No U23's manager either.
No public sign of new CEO yet.
Squad in Portugal at a training camp with a cup fixture next Saturday. Complete farce.
The Portugal trip about sums up this club. Who thought it was a good idea to fly off to Europe 1 week before the first competitive game, if the government suddenly decide Portugal is dodgy then the entire first team faces 2 weeks isolation. If that happens do Reading get to postpone the Colchester and Derby games?
Plenty of other Championship clubs are also currently abroad. Bournemouth are also in Portugal and there’ll be contingency plans for a route home with 24hrs notice.
They’ll get the Portimonense friendly out the way and will start jetting players back afterwards.
by Sutekh » 30 Aug 2020 10:32
CountryRoyal Not sure if I’ve missed it - how are we pronouncing his name?
by SCIAG » 30 Aug 2020 10:57
Elm Park Kid My feeling is that fans are moving from anger towards apathy. I've seen a few posts on here trying to defend the decision, but at the end of the day it's just another wild stab in the dark, hoping it works out. What's the old saying - fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Anyone who believes that this is in anyway a positive move deserves to be upset when it all comes crashing down.
As fans, I guess we just take the long view and hope that this ends with administration and new stable ownership as a League 1/2 club, rather than liquidation.
by Royal Rother » 30 Aug 2020 11:11
Snowflake Royal
That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to fail. And if the new guy somehow succeeds, and we get lucky on the gamble, that doesn't mean it was a good decision.
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 11:19
royalp-we I remember another relatively unknown Serb, Slavisa Jokanovic rocking up to Watford in October 2014. Their fans were beside themselves, his Hercules Side relegated the previous season; and sacked by Levski Sofia before that. But Watford were promoted come May 2015. Apparently he and Paunovic are of the same coaching ethos.
I’m gutted for Bowen. But these two ‘could’ work really well together. Especially as we want younger players, which is where Paunovic has proven coaching success.
You’ve got to take the positives; and let the results do the talking. Far too soon to suggest we’ll be languishing near the bottom of the table, in what is a relatively weak championship this season.
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 11:21
Royal RotherSnowflake Royal
That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to fail. And if the new guy somehow succeeds, and we get lucky on the gamble, that doesn't mean it was a good decision.
Yes it does.
I share all the frustration and scepticism expressed by so many, and yes, the number of fcuks I give reduces every year but if we somehow do manage to get promoted with this guy in charge it will have been a brilliant decision.
And a miracle.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Aug 2020 11:23
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 11:42
CountryRoyal Not sure if I’ve missed it - how are we pronouncing his name?
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 11:47
Snowflake Royal You guys should read the rest of the post.
Getting lucky =/= making good decisions.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Aug 2020 11:54
MillsySnowflake Royal You guys should read the rest of the post.
Getting lucky =/= making good decisions.
I did, and that’s crap sorry. It might suit your narrative if you end up being wrong that it was just luck and it was still objectively a poor decision at the time, but this isn’t a total random punt like someone spending £1000 on a lottery ticket, it’s a decision based on factors we have no idea about.
If he ends up good it’ll have undoubtedly been a good decision, no question about it.
Stick with your hunch and accept the consequences with grace. It’s ok to be wrong.
by Millsy » 30 Aug 2020 12:15
Snowflake RoyalMillsySnowflake Royal You guys should read the rest of the post.
Getting lucky =/= making good decisions.
I did, and that’s crap sorry. It might suit your narrative if you end up being wrong that it was just luck and it was still objectively a poor decision at the time, but this isn’t a total random punt like someone spending £1000 on a lottery ticket, it’s a decision based on factors we have no idea about.
If he ends up good it’ll have undoubtedly been a good decision, no question about it.
Stick with your hunch and accept the consequences with grace. It’s ok to be wrong.
Firstly, no good reason to remove Bowen.
Secondly, history of poor decisions along the same lines
Thirdly, similarly unimpressive record and lack of experience to previous failed appointments
Fourthly, timing is objectively bad
Fifthly, poor decisions being made about spending and signings which compound on the same previous mistakes.
A good decision is one that's based on sound reasoning, and can be expected to have a fair chance of success, with similar decisions likely to replicate that success.
This is more oxf*rd and isn't a good decision, if we happen to have lucked out on someone competent accidentally, who can make a good job with poor and poorly managed resources, that doesn't make it a good decision.
Look at sacking McDermott and replacing him with Stam, short lived success based on poor decision making that quickly fell apart. Preceded and followed by more poor decision making and failure.
At best, we'll get that.
Have you heard the phrase, the ends don't justify the means?
by Stranded » 30 Aug 2020 12:35
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Aug 2020 13:52
MillsySnowflake RoyalMillsy
I did, and that’s crap sorry. It might suit your narrative if you end up being wrong that it was just luck and it was still objectively a poor decision at the time, but this isn’t a total random punt like someone spending £1000 on a lottery ticket, it’s a decision based on factors we have no idea about.
If he ends up good it’ll have undoubtedly been a good decision, no question about it.
Stick with your hunch and accept the consequences with grace. It’s ok to be wrong.
Firstly, no good reason to remove Bowen.
Secondly, history of poor decisions along the same lines
Thirdly, similarly unimpressive record and lack of experience to previous failed appointments
Fourthly, timing is objectively bad
Fifthly, poor decisions being made about spending and signings which compound on the same previous mistakes.
A good decision is one that's based on sound reasoning, and can be expected to have a fair chance of success, with similar decisions likely to replicate that success.
This is more oxf*rd and isn't a good decision, if we happen to have lucked out on someone competent accidentally, who can make a good job with poor and poorly managed resources, that doesn't make it a good decision.
Look at sacking McDermott and replacing him with Stam, short lived success based on poor decision making that quickly fell apart. Preceded and followed by more poor decision making and failure.
At best, we'll get that.
Have you heard the phrase, the ends don't justify the means?
I agree I’m not happy with any of this myself.
But there you go again saying if this works is “because we happen to have lucked out.. accidentally”.
I was utterly wrong with my assessment of McDermott, I couldn’t have been more vocal about my disappointment when he was appointed but when he took us up I put my hands up, admitted I was wrong, and didn’t defend my initial assessment claiming it was just a lucky appointment that accidentally worked. There’s nothing accidental about professionals spending weeks making an assessment, offering contracts, spending hundreds of thousands, bringing in coaching staff, sacking people etc etc.
This isn’t a lottery purchase it’s a complex high end (multiple) job appointment with many many factors considered by many professional people - factors that are way above our heads as random people on a forum.
You’re trying to preempt being wrong now by saying if it works it’s just an accident. Just accept it, stick your neck out and say you think it’s a bad decision and if he ends up coming good accept it honourably. No one will think less of you for it.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 30 Aug 2020 14:14
Stranded if we are top 6 by end of October majority will be happy enough with life.
Users browsing this forum: bcubed and 261 guests