by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2014 09:12
by Norfolk Royal » 11 Mar 2014 09:27
by multisync1830 » 11 Mar 2014 10:24
Norfolk Royal That tweet from the BBC guy saying the exclusivity agreement is 'close to expiring' is meaningless.
What does close mean?
by DaveBanana » 11 Mar 2014 11:02
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2014 11:14
by Terminal Boardom » 11 Mar 2014 12:37
by PieEater » 11 Mar 2014 13:32
by wally bassoon » 11 Mar 2014 14:26
Extended-Phenotype
I am Forum Death. You need to leave, Dave Banana. RIGHT NOW.
by DaveBanana » 11 Mar 2014 15:21
Extended-Phenotype
I am Forum Death. You need to leave, Dave Banana. RIGHT NOW.
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2014 15:25
by sandman » 11 Mar 2014 15:32
Extended-Phenotype This forum is mine.
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2014 16:00
by sandman » 11 Mar 2014 16:01
Extended-Phenotype
Sandman...
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2014 16:04
by wally bassoon » 11 Mar 2014 17:03
Extended-Phenotype I need to ask Libertine what to do next.
by PremAddict » 11 Mar 2014 18:19
multisync1830Norfolk Royal That tweet from the BBC guy saying the exclusivity agreement is 'close to expiring' is meaningless.
What does close mean?
imho
An hour, = stupidly close
two hours, very very close
two weeks, = close
two months, getting close
two years? not close at all
by LoyalRoyalFan » 11 Mar 2014 18:22
1871 not 1998
Wow, John Madejski really has lost the plot if that is true, and it's not the first time this season that these rumours have come out. Since when is gambling a clubs future by taking loans against future ticket receipts a good idea? We should have sold one or two in January and asked Adkins to promote a couple of the youngsters, and start his summer rebuilding early. So now we're not only hoping this new owner passes the fit and proper test with the Football League this month, but we're also hoping they are prepared to put substantial funds into the playing staff just to keep the bang average squad we have, before even considering adding to it. Pardon me for not feeling optimistic about our future. Well done John! At least you gambling on our future ensures you still get your money for your shares though aye!
by RoyalBlue » 11 Mar 2014 18:59
SPARTAZacNaloen Hang on, the only rumour I've heard is that we will struggle to pay wages next year.
Which can be sorted by clearing out any contracts expiring and offering up anyone on big money for next to nothing incoming.
There were rumours before xmas that we may be in trouble come February as we couldn't afford the wages. Then the transfer window came and went and although we didn't spend (and Sharp and Baird came off the wage bill), we didn't sell either. But that same rumour appears to have resurfaced today regarding getting to the end of the season. I don't think anyone is any the wiser about what state we're in. All we are sure about is SJM being extremely keen to sell.
by multisync1830 » 11 Mar 2014 21:08
PremAddictmultisync1830Norfolk Royal That tweet from the BBC guy saying the exclusivity agreement is 'close to expiring' is meaningless.
What does close mean?
imho
An hour, = stupidly close
two hours, very very close
two weeks, = close
two months, getting close
two years? not close at all
A reasonable opinion. If some entity is serious about a buyout, the exclusivity is to cover time for due diligence. In "normal" commercial business, exclusivity in the range of 6 months is not all that uncommon so the tweet is a bunch of bunk IMHO.
by Ian Royal » 11 Mar 2014 22:12
UkeIan Royalroyalgrumpy If you believe everything that has supposedly come out of the club this season then we took a loan out with Vibrac to receive the parachute payment early, and then took another loan out against future ticket sales. When did Si John become that erratic? Come on! We know he would have sold some of the high earners first, both in the summer and in January. I'm sorry, but I cannot buy this at all. The Vibrac loan I can, just about, but not the latter.
Hadn't heard the future ticket sales one. That way madness lies so I hope it isn't true.
We should know in the summer with SJM in charge because if it's true it'll be cheap freebies in and everything must go sales for the squad. He'd never sell us down the river in that way.
I confused the Vibrac loan, which is against the future revenues (mainly para payments) with against receipts
Before it becomes an internet "fact" we can knock it on the head.
My very bad
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Bing [Bot] and 228 guests