by zac naloen » 31 Aug 2006 16:08
by SpaceCruiser » 31 Aug 2006 16:10
by Y21 » 31 Aug 2006 16:10
PlatypussY21 I think this is being blown out of all proportion by the sensation hunting people on here. If, what the Sun has reported is true then it sounds like he had a barny with his missus which lead to an unfortunate bust up with a mate of his resulting in a headbutt. The fact it was in a nightclub in Bristol is irrelevant. The same thing could have happened anywhere. It doesn't sound like he went out of his way to get into trouble, it just happened after an argument with his missus. It makes me laugh the moral majority on here getting their collective knickers in a twist over an incident where nobody knows the facts - its a shame that everyone seems to be hanging him out to dry before hearing the whole story. My opinion is that we should wait until the full story is known before spouting forth anymore crap on here.
Will you be saying the same to Steve Coppell then?
by zac naloen » 31 Aug 2006 16:14
SpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
by Scarface » 31 Aug 2006 16:16
zac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
by Royalee » 31 Aug 2006 16:16
SpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
by SpaceCruiser » 31 Aug 2006 16:16
zac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
by zac naloen » 31 Aug 2006 16:17
Scarfacezac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
I not concerned about that. Fact is he was out in Bristol after a long drive back from defeat at Wigan. He has been warned before by Coppell and he's ignored it, get the twat out at Christmas.
by SpaceCruiser » 31 Aug 2006 16:17
RoyaleeSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?
by Ian Royal » 31 Aug 2006 16:17
zac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
by zac naloen » 31 Aug 2006 16:17
SpaceCruiserzac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
So, is he guilty then, or not?
by Stranded » 31 Aug 2006 16:19
SpaceCruiserzac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
So, is he guilty then, or not?
by Ian Royal » 31 Aug 2006 16:19
SpaceCruiserRoyaleeSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?
Perhaps to clear his name?
by Royalee » 31 Aug 2006 16:21
SpaceCruiserScarfaceSpaceCruiserRoyalBlue We are well aware that he disregarded previous warnings from his bosses re keeping out of situations/environments that might lead to this sort of trouble.
How many warnings have there been then?
He was opublically warned about his "public profile" last season when he was glassed out in Bristol. Coppell quite rightly expects his players to behave on and off the pitch.
That's one. RB, the knobjockey, seems to imply that he's had more than one warning.
by Royalee » 31 Aug 2006 16:21
SpaceCruiserRoyaleeSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?
Perhaps to clear his name?
by rfcjoe » 31 Aug 2006 16:25
by Royalcop » 31 Aug 2006 16:45
zac naloenSpaceCruiser But has he been charged?
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.
by fallen angel » 31 Aug 2006 16:45
[/quote]rfcjoe I totally agree with all you rfc fans who think leroy lita is a waste of space.he cant hold up a ball to save his life and his work rate is sh*t.
by phil in cornwall » 31 Aug 2006 16:45
I totally agree with all you rfc fans who think leroy lita is a waste of space.he cant hold up a ball to save his life and his work rate is sh*t.
by handbags_harris » 31 Aug 2006 17:19
The Insider If it was a black eye it could be dismissed as handbags
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 218 guests