brendywendyVictor Meldrew Just read the Daily Mail report on our game plus a bit from Marcus-my how how profile has risen with The Press.
The report was quite good and the ratings were interesting in that he gave Bikey9,Hunt8 and Seol............4 the same as their useless Anichebe.
Many of our posters seemed to think he had a good game but I think we are back to the Meaker Syndrome.
We become so used to moderate performances that anything just slightly better than moderate is pounced upon and suddenly some fans are calling it good.
The rating of 4 may be a bit harsh but for his overall impact on the game I would put him at best on 6 and possibly on 5.
th edaily mail
such a paragon or reporting virtues
not sure i respect anything that paper says or does
he got plenty of good scores in the other paper
and i would rather trust the evidence of my own eyes, which showed him have an improved game in te area of workrate tracking back, tackling and generally getting stuck in and trying his heart out
thanks
My point was that a NEUTRAL observer gave the sort of marks we might have given for Bikey and Hunt and for Amichebe so why would he be so far out for Seol.
Maybe your eyes shouldn't be trusted.