TommyF lets face it, 99 times out of 100 that Kebe shot would have been on target for other players, including Blue Square Premier ones!
No it wouldn't.
by Maguire » 11 Aug 2009 11:12
TommyF lets face it, 99 times out of 100 that Kebe shot would have been on target for other players, including Blue Square Premier ones!
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2009 11:59
Woodcote RoyalSun Tzu He also didn't bring on any youngsters.....
He's clearly undecided !
A team which was a straight 50/50 split between young guns and older players and the one sub a mid range product.
He's hedging his bets.....
![]()
Who was the oldest player in that team?
50/50 is just utter nonsense.
Rosenior and Cisse were the only senior players/regular starters from Coppell's era and how old are they?
It was nothing short of a "This is my team and very few of yours will be in it" selection.
Time will tell but even Rosy and Cisse look like they were picked for lack of alternatives (as much as I like Cisse and hope he has a future here) or we've just spent £2m on a defender who is going to sit on the bench.........................clearly a painful day for the Coppellites
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2009 12:02
If the side picked itself, don't you find it a little odd that Harper and Marek are fit to play tomorrow night?
by Woodcote Royal » 11 Aug 2009 12:08
by Hoop Blah » 11 Aug 2009 12:12
Woodcote Royal Are you really that naive?
by Thaumagurist* » 11 Aug 2009 12:12
by CMRoyal » 11 Aug 2009 12:13
Woodcote Royal If the side picked itself, don't you find it a little odd that Harper and Marek are fit to play tomorrow night?
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2009 12:19
Woodcote Royal Are you really that naive?
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2009 12:19
Woodcote Royal Are you really that naive?
by Royalee » 11 Aug 2009 12:20
brendywendyWoodcote Royal Are you really that naive?
are you really that stoopid?
by SCIAG » 11 Aug 2009 12:27
by Thaumagurist* » 11 Aug 2009 12:29
by SCIAG » 11 Aug 2009 12:32
Thaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
by wolsey » 11 Aug 2009 12:38
SCIAGThaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
Precisely.
by brendywendy » 11 Aug 2009 12:41
RoyaleebrendywendyWoodcote Royal Are you really that naive?
are you really that stoopid?
Says possibly the most stupid poster on here.
by Royalee » 11 Aug 2009 12:54
Thaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 11 Aug 2009 12:57
RoyaleeThaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
Davies had 2 shots on his own, Church had a header, Cisse and Karacan both had shots at goal, Kebe missed a sitter...you can't count.
by Hoop Blah » 11 Aug 2009 13:48
Thaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
by Tails » 11 Aug 2009 13:56
by Thaumagurist* » 11 Aug 2009 14:10
Bill Oddie's BeardRoyaleeThaumagurist* I've just read on the official site that we made 483 passes.
That's FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE passes!
And we only had 2 shots on goal from all those passes.
Davies had 2 shots on his own, Church had a header, Cisse and Karacan both had shots at goal, Kebe missed a sitter...you can't count.
2 on target is what he meant
Hoop Blah How many did we make on average last season?
Hoop Blah How many did we make per game under Burns?
Users browsing this forum: Father Flipper, Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 382 guests