by Gus the teenage cow » 06 Apr 2014 00:09
by Sutekh » 06 Apr 2014 08:55
Dick Habbin's hairdo So, come on, who was sitting in the Reading seats in the CAFC directors' box today?
Any of these?
by RoyalBlue » 06 Apr 2014 10:18
Haag Royal Just heard a great interview by NH on BBCRB.
Spoke for about 10 mins and actually said bugger all. Kept talking about it being a transition period. Perhaps they might charge us transitional prices for our season tickets next year then.
by multisync1830 » 06 Apr 2014 11:02
RoyalBlueHaag Royal Just heard a great interview by NH on BBCRB.
Spoke for about 10 mins and actually said bugger all. Kept talking about it being a transition period. Perhaps they might charge us transitional prices for our season tickets next year then.
They may well do. A 5% increase to help fund the transition!
And NH was sent out to do the dirty work with the media? So Madejski has suddenly become media shy? Quelle surprise! 'Now about that transfer funding that you said would be available Sir John?'
Straw man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the logical fallacy. For other uses, see Straw man (disambiguation).
"Man of straw" redirects here. For the novel by Heinrich Mann, see Der Untertan.
A straw man, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally,[1][2] is a common type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on the misrepresentation of the original topic of argument. To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.
The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" implies an adversarial, polemic, or combative debate, and creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument, ("knock down a straw man,") instead of the original proposition.[3][4]
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery, entertaining "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or understanding both sides of the issue.
Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate:
A: We should relax the laws on beer.
B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only for immediate gratification.
The proposal was to relax laws on beer. Person B has exaggerated this to a position harder to defend, i.e., "unrestricted access to intoxicants". It is a logical fallacy because Person A never made that claim.
by melonhead » 06 Apr 2014 11:12
RoyalBlueHaag Royal Just heard a great interview by NH on BBCRB.
Spoke for about 10 mins and actually said bugger all. Kept talking about it being a transition period. Perhaps they might charge us transitional prices for our season tickets next year then.
They may well do. A 5% increase to help fund the transition!
And NH was sent out to do the dirty work with the media? So Madejski has suddenly become media shy? Quelle surprise! 'Now about that transfer funding that you said would be available Sir John?'
by LoyalRoyal22 » 06 Apr 2014 15:56
by blueroyals » 06 Apr 2014 17:48
LoyalRoyal22 If we got promoted and Anton came back and apologised for his absence and took full control of the club, would we forgive him?
by Uke » 06 Apr 2014 18:06
LoyalRoyal22 If we got promoted and Anton came back and apologised for his absence and took full control of the club, would we forgive him?
by Ian Royal » 06 Apr 2014 18:29
by jellytot » 06 Apr 2014 19:53
Ian Royal Depends on the reason he disappeared.
by AthleticoSpizz » 06 Apr 2014 20:27
by RoyallyFcuked » 07 Apr 2014 16:19
by maffff » 07 Apr 2014 16:52
by ZacNaloen » 07 Apr 2014 17:09
by Extended-Phenotype » 07 Apr 2014 18:21
by melonhead » 08 Apr 2014 09:49
by Extended-Phenotype » 08 Apr 2014 10:45
by jellytot » 08 Apr 2014 11:25
Extended-Phenotype Reading are around 11/2 to get promotion.
Promoted team >>>>> Promotion candidate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Championship team
Difficult to calculate it without the actual values but I reckon it would be an odd gamble to take.
by Sutekh » 08 Apr 2014 16:50
jellytotExtended-Phenotype Reading are around 11/2 to get promotion.
Promoted team >>>>> Promotion candidate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Championship team
Difficult to calculate it without the actual values but I reckon it would be an odd gamble to take.
If we get to the final bet heavily on the opposition to soften the blow of defeat!
by SPARTA » 10 Apr 2014 11:20
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 292 guests