Confimred new owners of Raeding Footbal Club

8685 posts
User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21990
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Buyout

by Royal Rother » 07 May 2014 21:14

"Players want to stay but being forced to find new clubs..."

That might well be right of course.

McAnuff, Leigertwood and Gorkss are 3 we know of. Let's hope there's a few more.

CholseyRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 539
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 07:37
Location: Cholsey, Oxon

Re: Buyout

by CholseyRoyal » 07 May 2014 21:17

Royal Rother "Players want to stay but being forced to find new clubs..."

That might well be right of course.

McAnuff, Leigertwood and Gorkss are 3 we know of. Let's hope there's a few more.



Oh there will be but unfortunately not the big earners. They will do a Jason Roberts and run their contracts down rather than move on especially as no one will take them on at their wages :(

User avatar
West Stand Flash
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 860
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 21:58
Location: Compound in Dodger's HQ

Re: Buyout

by West Stand Flash » 07 May 2014 21:44

sandman LOL at anyone who believes a word of anything the pathetic WSF posts.

He'd rather climb a tree and tell a lie than stay on the ground and tell the truth.


OK.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21990
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Buyout

by Royal Rother » 07 May 2014 22:29

CholseyRoyal
Royal Rother "Players want to stay but being forced to find new clubs..."

That might well be right of course.

McAnuff, Leigertwood and Gorkss are 3 we know of. Let's hope there's a few more.



Oh there will be but unfortunately not the big earners. They will do a Jason Roberts and run their contracts down rather than move on especially as no one will take them on at their wages :(


Well I'm not so sure about that. It isn't as if Pog is old and unfit - he is worth money still, unlike Roberts was for the last year or more.

If we forego any tfr fee, thus allowing Pog to negotiate his own signing personal on fee, then he might just end up being happy to leave.

And his agent might like it because presumably he would get a nice slice of that signing on fee as soon as the deal is done, rather than having to wait for it over the course of his contract. (I assume it works like that, but only guessing really.)

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1935
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: Buyout

by gazzer, loyal royal » 11 May 2014 08:19

it does look bleak - expect a fire sale unless we find a buyer ASAP.

looking likely the high earners will be moved on on free transfers and of assets will go for a few million


User avatar
yappy
Member
Posts: 719
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:56

Re: Buyout

by yappy » 12 May 2014 21:38

Ah man, always feels a bit more real when gazzer pops up :(

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Buyout

by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:18

gazzer, loyal royal it does look bleak - expect a fire sale unless we find a buyer ASAP.

looking likely the high earners will be moved on on free transfers and of assets will go for a few million


You've stayed away too long, gaz. But for those that didn't want to listen to just how bad things are, maybe they will now you've added some weight to it.

Theroyalbox
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1117
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 15:29

Re: Buyout

by Theroyalbox » 12 May 2014 22:39

The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Buyout

by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:45

Theroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous


Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.


sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Buyout

by sandman » 12 May 2014 22:50

SPARTA
gazzer, loyal royal it does look bleak - expect a fire sale unless we find a buyer ASAP.

looking likely the high earners will be moved on on free transfers and of assets will go for a few million


You've stayed away too long, gaz. But for those that didn't want to listen to just how bad things are, maybe they will now you've added some weight to it.


:lol: @ the idea of some bloke on the Internet adding 'weight' to it.

I think many of us can see things are getting tight at the club without the help of the itk brigade.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Buyout

by winchester_royal » 12 May 2014 22:51

SPARTA
Theroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous


Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.


Errr, how do we know this?

Plus it's more than likely that the likes of Howe, Hammond, and CS are conducting negotiations with interested parties rather than the lovable old perv himself.

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Buyout

by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:54

winchester_royal
SPARTA
Theroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous


Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.


Errr, how do we know this?

Plus it's more than likely that the likes of Howe, Hammond, and CS are conducting negotiations with interested parties rather than the lovable old perv himself.


Because more than a few reliable people have said as such. As for Sandman, you clearly don't know gazza's history on here.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Buyout

by winchester_royal » 12 May 2014 23:00

A few posters saying it =/= 'we know'

Gazza is the only person with a proven track record on this forum, and even then sometimes his opinion can sometimes be misconstrued for 'fact'.

FWIW IMO there is no chance Sir John is going to let the club go into administration, and hence erode any value he'll get from a sale, rather than see his name replaced by a sponsor for a few years.


User avatar
Bandini
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3761
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 16:01
Location: No one must know I dropped my glasses in the toilet.

Re: Buyout

by Bandini » 13 May 2014 05:51

ALOL at the idea of a buyout foundering on Hammond's salary.

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: Buyout

by sandman » 13 May 2014 06:20

winchester_royal
SPARTA
Theroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous


Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.


Errr, how do we know this?

Plus it's more than likely that the likes of Howe, Hammond, and CS are conducting negotiations with interested parties rather than the lovable old perv himself.


SPARTA Because more than a few reliable people have said as such. As for Sandman, you clearly don't know gazza's history on here.


Yes I know his "history" and fair play he's got a few transfers right but you don't need supposed 'reliable' sources on an internet forum to tell you the club are in trouble. I think the owner being missing for months was a pretty good giveaway.
Last edited by sandman on 13 May 2014 06:37, edited 1 time in total.

multisync1830
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1648
Joined: 02 Nov 2012 15:55

Re: Buyout

by multisync1830 » 13 May 2014 06:26

sandman [

quote="SPARTA"]Because more than a few reliable people have said as such. As for Sandman, you clearly don't know gazza's history on here.


Yes I know his "history" and fair play he's got a few transfers right but you don't need supposed 'reliable' sources on an internet forum to tell you the club are in trouble. I think the owner being missing for months was a pretty good giveaway.[/quote]


The Three Phases of Truth
.


Truth passes through three phases:
##First it is ridiculed.
##Second it is fiercely and violently opposed.
##Third, it becomes self-evident.

— Arthur Schopenhauer

When a new way is suggested, people often criticize it as strange, outlandish, or even at odds with how the laws of the universe. It is lambasted and laughed at.

When momentum begins to build for change, ridicule gives way to concerted opposition. The forces that benefit from the way things are currently arranged feel affronted. They defend the status quo without whatever means necessary.

When this momentum builds into an undeniable force, it creates an incentive for the power-holders to move off their adamant position. Now the impossible is not only possible, it becomes the new standard. It becomes self-evident

multisync1830
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1648
Joined: 02 Nov 2012 15:55

Re: Buyout

by multisync1830 » 13 May 2014 06:35

Bandini ALOL at the idea of a buyout foundering on Hammond's salary.

this is above Hammods level or rather out of his remit

Anton Zingarevich, Chris Samuelson, Andrew Obolensky and John Samuelson. : Sir John Madejski and Ian Wood-Smith and Nigel Howe

as if you'd trust selling a club to a DOC.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13767
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Buyout

by Royal Lady » 13 May 2014 09:33

Who is to say the new owners would keep Hammond et al on anyway - so I hardly think Hammond's salary would be influential in whether someone buys this club or not. :roll:

User avatar
Sir Dodger Royal
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: Cyberspace - pulling the strings. You know it makes sense.

Re: Buyout

by Sir Dodger Royal » 13 May 2014 10:10

It's interesting that Squeaky (signs no one) Hammond earns in excess of £350000 a year at RFC. For doing what I ask? He can go now, at least there would be a positive benefit in saving money. Real Facts. Real World. SDR Main Mannnnnn

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 13 May 2014 10:16

winchester_royal A few posters saying it =/= 'we know'

Gazza is the only person with a proven track record on this forum, and even then sometimes his opinion can sometimes be misconstrued for 'fact'.

FWIW IMO there is no chance Sir John is going to let the club go into administration, and hence erode any value he'll get from a sale, rather than see his name replaced by a sponsor for a few years.


agreed - as desper8 as he is right now i can see a stadium name change as a big possibility

8685 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Jack Celliers and 222 guests

It is currently 16 Feb 2025 21:37