by Royal Rother » 07 May 2014 21:14
by CholseyRoyal » 07 May 2014 21:17
Royal Rother "Players want to stay but being forced to find new clubs..."
That might well be right of course.
McAnuff, Leigertwood and Gorkss are 3 we know of. Let's hope there's a few more.
by West Stand Flash » 07 May 2014 21:44
sandman LOL at anyone who believes a word of anything the pathetic WSF posts.
He'd rather climb a tree and tell a lie than stay on the ground and tell the truth.
by Royal Rother » 07 May 2014 22:29
CholseyRoyalRoyal Rother "Players want to stay but being forced to find new clubs..."
That might well be right of course.
McAnuff, Leigertwood and Gorkss are 3 we know of. Let's hope there's a few more.
Oh there will be but unfortunately not the big earners. They will do a Jason Roberts and run their contracts down rather than move on especially as no one will take them on at their wages
by gazzer, loyal royal » 11 May 2014 08:19
by yappy » 12 May 2014 21:38
by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:18
gazzer, loyal royal it does look bleak - expect a fire sale unless we find a buyer ASAP.
looking likely the high earners will be moved on on free transfers and of assets will go for a few million
by Theroyalbox » 12 May 2014 22:39
by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:45
Theroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous
by sandman » 12 May 2014 22:50
SPARTAgazzer, loyal royal it does look bleak - expect a fire sale unless we find a buyer ASAP.
looking likely the high earners will be moved on on free transfers and of assets will go for a few million
You've stayed away too long, gaz. But for those that didn't want to listen to just how bad things are, maybe they will now you've added some weight to it.
by winchester_royal » 12 May 2014 22:51
SPARTATheroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous
Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.
by SPARTA » 12 May 2014 22:54
winchester_royalSPARTATheroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous
Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.
Errr, how do we know this?
Plus it's more than likely that the likes of Howe, Hammond, and CS are conducting negotiations with interested parties rather than the lovable old perv himself.
by winchester_royal » 12 May 2014 23:00
by Bandini » 13 May 2014 05:51
by sandman » 13 May 2014 06:20
winchester_royalSPARTATheroyalbox The club has interest in though... They have spoken to buyers who have been very interested but the problem lies with Hammond and the other directors... They have asked for too high wages and that's put people off. Madjeski is talking with a potential Indian owner now about buying the club he is doing it personally as the directors have put buyers off previous
Hammond? How on earth is he a problem? The problems are with those selling the club. They want a certain price, and in SJM's case we know he wants assurances the stadium name will never change, and that will be off putting to some/many as it can bring in as much as 700k a season at this level (Derby 7m deal over 10 years). There has been a lot of interest, some though was from parties that didn't have enough money behind them. Others, well who knows... The situation is pretty dire though, and needs resolving ASAP. Will SJM do the best by Reading? You'd hope so, but by making any such demands, he's actually part of the problem.
Errr, how do we know this?
Plus it's more than likely that the likes of Howe, Hammond, and CS are conducting negotiations with interested parties rather than the lovable old perv himself.
SPARTA Because more than a few reliable people have said as such. As for Sandman, you clearly don't know gazza's history on here.
by multisync1830 » 13 May 2014 06:26
sandman [
quote="SPARTA"]Because more than a few reliable people have said as such. As for Sandman, you clearly don't know gazza's history on here.
The Three Phases of Truth
.
Truth passes through three phases:
##First it is ridiculed.
##Second it is fiercely and violently opposed.
##Third, it becomes self-evident.
— Arthur Schopenhauer
When a new way is suggested, people often criticize it as strange, outlandish, or even at odds with how the laws of the universe. It is lambasted and laughed at.
When momentum begins to build for change, ridicule gives way to concerted opposition. The forces that benefit from the way things are currently arranged feel affronted. They defend the status quo without whatever means necessary.
When this momentum builds into an undeniable force, it creates an incentive for the power-holders to move off their adamant position. Now the impossible is not only possible, it becomes the new standard. It becomes self-evident
by multisync1830 » 13 May 2014 06:35
Bandini ALOL at the idea of a buyout foundering on Hammond's salary.
by Royal Lady » 13 May 2014 09:33
by Sir Dodger Royal » 13 May 2014 10:10
by melonhead » 13 May 2014 10:16
winchester_royal A few posters saying it =/= 'we know'
Gazza is the only person with a proven track record on this forum, and even then sometimes his opinion can sometimes be misconstrued for 'fact'.
FWIW IMO there is no chance Sir John is going to let the club go into administration, and hence erode any value he'll get from a sale, rather than see his name replaced by a sponsor for a few years.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Jack Celliers and 222 guests