by Ian Royal »
12 Jan 2012 20:15
Jesus Christ. Why is it so fricking hard for some of you to see the difference between an idiot who wants us to spend the earth all the time, or dismisses anyone who doesn't come from a big club or for a big fee as shit and people who are a bit concerned that we are overly reliant on trying for cheap-gambles to come good.
We have an overabundence of strikers who aren't really making a proper impact or are ones for a year or two down the line. It's brilliant when it pays off, and yes, sometimes, like Doyle they make an instant impact. But the vast majority who succeed take time and the majority (of cheap gambles) fail.
I'm well aware every signing is a gamble. When I use that phrase its specifically for those players who are almost totally unknown quantities.
Sheppard may be an excellent signing, straight away, or in a year or so. I hope he is. I'd be delighted. But that doesn't change the fact that for success this season, we're currently banking on a striker showing significantly better form over the rest of the season than they've shown for us, or at this level before.
Sheppard would be a good signing, just like Doyle was, if we had a Kitson and a Lita already. But we don't. At best we've got a Lita in Hunt.
He has a lot going for him, goalscoring record, age, European experience.... but anyone who thinks the chances of him having much impact this season are anything other than slim is deluding themselves. Especially given his fitness.
That's why there's a fair few questioning this. It's not a case of saying don't look for the buried gems. Or we shouldn't have signed him. It's more that we've signed several we shouldn't have bothered with already and we need to lose some of the obssession we're developing with hunting out these gems.
If we hadn't wasted time and money on the likes of Baseya and Brett Williams, players who were never going to make it here, and who I believe are either older, or have far worse scoring records... or both, there would be a lot less concern.