by Bandini » 22 Dec 2013 16:25
by winchester_royal » 22 Dec 2013 16:37
sandman Stone the crows Spurs just beat Southampton playing 4-4-2 in the Premier League.
by howser » 22 Dec 2013 16:48
by fruits » 22 Dec 2013 17:24
by sandman » 22 Dec 2013 17:46
by rob the royal » 22 Dec 2013 18:01
sandman Well put post but sadly I feel you're wrong. Personality doesn't fit, tactics don't fit and quite frankly he seems to be in it half heartedly as well.
by Cureton's Volley » 22 Dec 2013 18:50
PistolPete McDermott was so popular
by Cureton's Volley » 22 Dec 2013 19:00
Tony Le MesmerRoyalBlueBandini OP has this spot on. It seems that Adkins isn't even trying to win these days - it's more important for Atkins to maintain his "brand" of passing football than to get results now.
Good for him (maybe) but bad for the club.
Yesterday he explained exactly what he is trying to do and that objective is absolutely spot on. Better to build the team now that is capable of playing in a manner that gives a reasonable chance of survival in the PL than playing the lower league way, securing promotion and then trying to fix things once in the PL. The latter approach is doomed to failure as last season showed. If his persistence in adopting this passing approach costs us a few results in the short term, so what! I can't see how that is in any way detrimental to the club, in that longer term it will make us a much better and stronger team.
So you actually constitute the previous reign as a failure then? Despite only one previous reign having achieved more?
You also seem to be assuming that things will get better playing a supposedly better style of football. Tommy Burns and Brendan Rogers promised the same.
I put it to you that this team will achieve nothing playing the way we are. Above all else, team ethic is what will get Reading promoted and staying up. Passing style or direct, without that you're going nowhere. And we don't have that i'm afraid. I see a set of players with plenty of individual ability who are just not up for it under Adkins.
by rob the royal » 22 Dec 2013 19:25
Cureton's Volley
Yesterday he explained exactly what he is trying to do and that objective is absolutely spot on. Better to build the team now that is capable of playing in a manner that gives a reasonable chance of survival in the PL than playing the lower league way, securing promotion and then trying to fix things once in the PL. The latter approach is doomed to failure as last season showed. If his persistence in adopting this passing approach costs us a few results in the short term, so what! I can't see how that is in any way detrimental to the club, in that longer term it will make us a much better and stronger team.
by facaldaqui » 22 Dec 2013 19:27
by sandman » 22 Dec 2013 19:40
by Cureton's Volley » 22 Dec 2013 20:14
rob the royalCureton's Volley
Yesterday he explained exactly what he is trying to do and that objective is absolutely spot on. Better to build the team now that is capable of playing in a manner that gives a reasonable chance of survival in the PL than playing the lower league way, securing promotion and then trying to fix things once in the PL. The latter approach is doomed to failure as last season showed. If his persistence in adopting this passing approach costs us a few results in the short term, so what! I can't see how that is in any way detrimental to the club, in that longer term it will make us a much better and stronger team.
If match days constitute a passing practice for five players followed by a hoof upfield to give others ago they can do it behind closed doors.
by RoyalBlue » 22 Dec 2013 23:02
Cureton's Volleyrob the royalCureton's Volley
Yesterday he explained exactly what he is trying to do and that objective is absolutely spot on. Better to build the team now that is capable of playing in a manner that gives a reasonable chance of survival in the PL than playing the lower league way, securing promotion and then trying to fix things once in the PL. The latter approach is doomed to failure as last season showed. If his persistence in adopting this passing approach costs us a few results in the short term, so what! I can't see how that is in any way detrimental to the club, in that longer term it will make us a much better and stronger team.
If match days constitute a passing practice for five players followed by a hoof upfield to give others ago they can do it behind closed doors.
I might have had a few jars yesterday, but there is no way I would have written that apologetic excuse for our shit performance. You've quoted the wrong chap!
I think we are both in agreement that they can practise 'passing' in training, and focus 100% on winning against the team put in front of them. Thinking about what we are going to do 'when we get back in the PL' is fanciful crap. IIRC we were recently slating the Brighton fans for having a similar discussion on their own message board.
by rob the royal » 22 Dec 2013 23:18
RoyalBlue
Absolute rubbish. If you want to improve, you can't do that by training one way and then dropping it for a completely different style in games. You have to put your preferred style to a proper test and can only do that in real games. Also developing a team in the Championship that plays the way you need to do to increase your chances of survival when you get promoted to the PL is planning and building properly for the future. Far from being fanciful crap it is common sense. We saw only too clearly last season what happens when you go up to the PL as an 'effective Championship' team that has won promotion through great team spirit, commitment and hard work but then proceeds to continually gift possession to PL opponents who know how to keep it and punish you at the same time.
by Cureton's Volley » 22 Dec 2013 23:48
rob the royal P.S. Apologies Curo's Volley for earlier misquote - technical balls up
RoyalBlue If you want to improve, you can't do that by training one way and then dropping it for a completely different style in games.
RoyalBlue proceeds to continually gift possession to PL opponents who know how to keep it and punish you at the same time
by CountryRoyal » 23 Dec 2013 09:49
by Avon Royal » 23 Dec 2013 10:27
CountryRoyal I don't know why everyone is stressing balls. Yes the football is generally crap and we are underachieving......... but we have a new manager, new players and a new style to try and adjust to, not even mentioning injuries. Oh and our season always starts after xmas. We'll be fine.
by CountryRoyal » 23 Dec 2013 10:30
Avon RoyalCountryRoyal I don't know why everyone is stressing balls. Yes the football is generally crap and we are underachieving......... but we have a new manager, new players and a new style to try and adjust to, not even mentioning injuries. Oh and our season always starts after xmas. We'll be fine.
You say we are underachieving, and then list a whole load of reasons that would tend to suggest that we are in fact overachieving.
by Avon Royal » 23 Dec 2013 10:34
CountryRoyalAvon RoyalCountryRoyal I don't know why everyone is stressing balls. Yes the football is generally crap and we are underachieving......... but we have a new manager, new players and a new style to try and adjust to, not even mentioning injuries. Oh and our season always starts after xmas. We'll be fine.
You say we are underachieving, and then list a whole load of reasons that would tend to suggest that we are in fact overachieving.
I list factors that are hampering our ability, yet on face value with squad and manager we are underachieving. Imho.
by floyd__streete » 23 Dec 2013 13:22
Avon Royal Personally I thought a finish of 8th-6th was where we should be aiming, so I think we are on par.
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie, Cureton's Volley, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Richard and 219 guests