by Tilehurst Mike » 30 Jun 2009 22:43
by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 00:04
Tilehurst Mike I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 00:08
Tilehurst Mike ...the sooner the club finds a new owner to show the fans that the club is really striving to get back to the Premiership the better.
by Arch » 01 Jul 2009 04:58
Tilehurst Mike An excellent fee and whilst very sorry to see him go, I do think we had seen the best of him and in my view was never the same player since getting injured at Everton away.
It just gallls me to see how much the likes of Wolves, Hull, Stoke and even Burnley are prepared tp spend or have spent to compete and survive hopefully in the Premiership,
We really did waste an opportunity last season by not strengthening the squad in the transfer window. Whilst the idea of seeing a lot of the loaned out Academy lads being given prominant roles in the first eleven next season is somewhat exciting, I would like th club to show some ambition or state what its intentions are for next season. I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
I thank Madjeski for all that he has done, but the sooner the club finds a new owner to show the fans that the club is really striving to get back to the Premiership the better. No wonder season tickets are not being renewed even though I renewed mine from watching for over 45 years.
by RoyalBlue » 01 Jul 2009 08:24
Royal RotherTilehurst Mike I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.
by Royal Rother » 01 Jul 2009 08:48
RoyalBlueRoyal RotherTilehurst Mike I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.
Why should they?
by Uke » 01 Jul 2009 09:47
RoyalBlueRoyal RotherTilehurst Mike I have read all the various threads from accountants and 'financial experts' about the clubs finances, but something doesn;t add up.
The only thing that doesn't add up is the refusal of some posters to accept what the accountants and "financial experts" are saying.
Why should they? The only thing that the accountants and 'financial experts' on HNA can tell us is that the sums in the published accounts add up/balance!
Only JM and his accountants know the full details of what is happening with all of the money. I'm not for one moment suggesting that anything unlawful is happening, just that the published accounts portray one picture and, like an old painting, if you were able to strip back the layers, you might find something a bit different underneath.
I'm sure there isn't as much money knocking around as some of us would like to believe. However, at the same time, I just have a feeling that times might not be quite as hard as portrayed.
by gav2085 » 01 Jul 2009 13:17
by gav2085 » 01 Jul 2009 13:20
gav2085 does anybody know how much Kevin Doyle actually went for??? also how much of that do you think will actually be given to BR for new players?
by NR_Royal » 01 Jul 2009 13:20
by Sun Tzu » 01 Jul 2009 13:23
by SteveRoyal » 01 Jul 2009 13:28
Sun Tzu I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
by Royal Lady » 01 Jul 2009 13:48
He doesn't HAVE to do anything. He's already said we'll be cutting our cloth, again. I've not seen any comments about what his hopes for RFC are this coming season yet - but if he's saying he wants us to get promoted again, it's just rhetoric imo.SteveRoyalSun Tzu I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
'Greed.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
by Muskrat » 01 Jul 2009 13:50
by Sun Tzu » 01 Jul 2009 15:14
SteveRoyalSun Tzu I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
'Greed.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
by Terminal Boardom » 01 Jul 2009 16:47
Sun TzuSteveRoyalSun Tzu I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
'Greed.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
He can give him as much as Coppell needed to get us promoted, or as much as Burnley needed.
The obsession with money is crazy, it's one element but no one gets promoted for spending large amounts.
by Sun Tzu » 01 Jul 2009 16:56
Terminal BoardomSun Tzu
He can give him as much as Coppell needed to get us promoted, or as much as Burnley needed.
The obsession with money is crazy, it's one element but no one gets promoted for spending large amounts.
Errrrr..... Fulham perhaps?
by Wax Jacket » 01 Jul 2009 16:58
by Dennis the Butler » 01 Jul 2009 17:27
by Ian Royal » 01 Jul 2009 21:04
Royal LadyHe doesn't HAVE to do anything. He's already said we'll be cutting our cloth, again. I've not seen any comments about what his hopes for RFC are this coming season yet - but if he's saying he wants us to get promoted again, it's just rhetoric imo.SteveRoyalSun Tzu I predict Rodgers will be allowed the guano though.
'Greed.
If Madejski is serious about getting Reading promoted again (soon), then he'll have to give Rodgers the money asked for.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 184 guests