by Man Friday » 16 Oct 2010 21:47
by PEARCEY » 16 Oct 2010 21:48
by Ian Royal » 16 Oct 2010 21:50
Man Friday Far from it, we played O.K.
To me, it indicates we're mid-table fodder.
by Victor Meldrew » 16 Oct 2010 22:12
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 16 Oct 2010 22:26
by Hoop Blah » 16 Oct 2010 23:08
by Sir Rodger Doyle » 16 Oct 2010 23:19
Hoop Blah I thought that was a result we've been close to getting over the last few home games, the only difference being the lack of penalty or set piece goal to change the game in our favour.
Our complete lack of midfield and centre forward was shown up for what it is today. Armstong had done an admirable job in there since coming back but he's just not a central midfielder and, as in his previous games he just wasn't in the game enough and we failed to get a grip of the midfield. That makes it an even more difficult job for McAnuff to get in the game, and I think we've seen enough of him there to know he should be played out wide.
Our forwards all missed relatively easy chances and yet again the opposition keeper has gone home without having to make a serious save. Our keeper on the other hand made a couple of good saves in the spell after half time when they ripped us apart at will. He was the only player to really have a decent game, the rest were chasing shadows.
by Handsome Man » 16 Oct 2010 23:29
by winchester_royal » 16 Oct 2010 23:31
Handsome Man I thought the goal was Griffin's fault.
Long and Karacan were tireless, Kebe was OK, and 442 at the end got us close to an equaliser.
Mills was poor, Armstrong was anonymous and MacAnuff is better on the wing.
by Kitson12 » 16 Oct 2010 23:32
by West_Reading » 16 Oct 2010 23:56
by heathrow royal » 17 Oct 2010 00:03
winchester_royal LOL at blaming Mills for today. Thought him and Zurab were superb TBH, those two along with Griff, HRK and Feds were the only players to come out of today with any credit.
Lots of effort up top, but very little quality. Only looked threatening when we had 2 up top. Must be 4-4-2 on tuesday.
by winchester_royal » 17 Oct 2010 00:14
heathrow royalwinchester_royal LOL at blaming Mills for today. Thought him and Zurab were superb TBH, those two along with Griff, HRK and Feds were the only players to come out of today with any credit.
Lots of effort up top, but very little quality. Only looked threatening when we had 2 up top. Must be 4-4-2 on tuesday.
Really I thought he was poor for the 65 minutes that he was on the pitch. Think he is more of an impact player off the bench IMO
by From Despair To Where? » 17 Oct 2010 00:17
by Sarah Star » 17 Oct 2010 00:19
winchester_royalHandsome Man I thought the goal was Griffin's fault.
Long and Karacan were tireless, Kebe was OK, and 442 at the end got us close to an equaliser.
Mills was poor, Armstrong was anonymous and MacAnuff is better on the wing.
by Avon Royal » 17 Oct 2010 00:29
by leon » 17 Oct 2010 00:41
by Royalee » 17 Oct 2010 00:46
leon a witless performance - we lacked creativity and any real sense of urgency. We have got to get (at least) someone who can play up front. why do we play 1 up front at home?
by Kitson12 » 17 Oct 2010 00:51
Royaleeleon a witless performance - we lacked creativity and any real sense of urgency. We have got to get (at least) someone who can play up front. why do we play 1 up front at home?
At least we had creativity under Rodgers even if Madejski won't pay for a striker.
by leon » 17 Oct 2010 01:32
Royaleeleon a witless performance - we lacked creativity and any real sense of urgency. We have got to get (at least) someone who can play up front. why do we play 1 up front at home?
At least we had creativity under Rodgers even if Madejski won't pay for a striker.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests