Dirk GentlyMr OptimistRoyal Lady Tbf, he's hardly set the championship alight. He's struck lucky - I'll give him that.
I think that is extremely harsh on Shane. He is a good player at this level but I don't think he has developed as much or as quickly as some people would have hoped he would have done.
The older he gets the more "the potential" reduces. I remember when we signed him and Doyler and the Cork City fans were equally upset at losing Shane as they were Kev as they saw him as Kev's natural replacement and some tipped him to emerge a better player than Kev based on what they had seen of him. Trouble is, where kev could go on and play for a top 4 side and continues to develop, Shane's development seems to have levelled off a little.
I think it would cost more than £1m to adequately replace a still young goalscorer who is physically adept and experienced in this division.
Agreed - the crucial time for his development was 2-3 years ago, where a season on-loan with regular appearances could have made him as a player. Instead, we only used him as an impact sub and he was woefully under-played.
Definitely.
And in defence of Schards(

For me he's a League One star / Championship also ran, who could have been so much more. He just can't deliver a consistent level of good performance with goals. He hasn't been bad since before January. But he stopped scoring after his flurry in Jan / Feb.
Yet again we're looking at going into a season saying it's Long's last chance to prove what he can do. He is the king of rescuing his Reading career from the pyre with a brief burst that promises he'll finally deliver.