Thames Sports Investment

186 posts
User avatar
strap
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2802
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:06
Location: Gainsford End

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by strap » 24 Jan 2012 20:43

Uke The negotiations have been going on, but why the big announcements about Heads of Terms?



Quite simply because a Daily Mail reporter informed SJM/RFC that he had scooped the deal and would be pubilshing an exclusive in the following day's DM. SJM then had the choice of keeping quiet and letting the press put a spanner in the works, (a la Everton deal 2004), or agree with TSI to annouce the HoT before the DM story appeared the next day.

Oh, and quite a few other club Chairmen knew this deal was in the offing long before the press had a sniff. Football is as small and insular an industry as construction is.

User avatar
1871 Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2677
Joined: 24 Jan 2006 16:37
Location: Coming to a village cricket ground near you.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by 1871 Royal » 24 Jan 2012 20:44

Red
1871 Royal Very pleased with things after watching the press conference. When he mentioned European football, my heart skipped a little bit. In my 12 years of supporting this club I would never have thought something like this would happen.

In reality isn't European football (outside the champions league) just drab ties against Eastern European opposition in half empty stadia?

Say Reading did a Fulham, and perhaps reach a UEFA cup (or whatever it's called these days) final, even then there's a lot of dull rubbers to get through on rainy Thursday evenings.


To be honest, I would love to say Reading were in Europe, no matter what European competition its in.

And think of it like this. If we were to get into Europe could lead to attracting better, hungry players which could lead to a higher league finish which could lead to Champions League in about 10 years or whatever.

User avatar
urz13
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2058
Joined: 16 May 2011 20:37
Location: The following statement is false. The previous statement is true.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by urz13 » 24 Jan 2012 20:47

1871 Royal
Red
1871 Royal Very pleased with things after watching the press conference. When he mentioned European football, my heart skipped a little bit. In my 12 years of supporting this club I would never have thought something like this would happen.

In reality isn't European football (outside the champions league) just drab ties against Eastern European opposition in half empty stadia?

Say Reading did a Fulham, and perhaps reach a UEFA cup (or whatever it's called these days) final, even then there's a lot of dull rubbers to get through on rainy Thursday evenings.


To be honest, I would love to say Reading were in Europe, no matter what European competition its in.

And think of it like this. If we were to get into Europe could lead to attracting better, hungry players which could lead to a higher league finish which could lead to Champions League in about 10 years or whatever.

That made me LOL at first - but it's not awfully far fetched. This is surreal :D

User avatar
muddyfeet
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1944
Joined: 19 Nov 2010 11:40
Location: The pub

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by muddyfeet » 24 Jan 2012 20:48

Just watched press conf - exciting times ahead
Cant quite get my head around it yet!

User avatar
who are ya?
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2629
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Bracknell

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by who are ya? » 24 Jan 2012 20:50

The Rouge
Red
1871 Royal Very pleased with things after watching the press conference. When he mentioned European football, my heart skipped a little bit. In my 12 years of supporting this club I would never have thought something like this would happen.

In reality isn't European football (outside the champions league) just drab ties against Eastern European opposition in half empty stadia?

Say Reading did a Fulham, and perhaps reach a UEFA cup (or whatever it's called these days) final, even then there's a lot of dull rubbers to get through on rainy Thursday evenings.


I know what you mean Red but I would certainly want a pizza that action!

Who knows what will happen after investing some dough


User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6660
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by PieEater » 24 Jan 2012 20:59

1871 Royal
Red
1871 Royal Very pleased with things after watching the press conference. When he mentioned European football, my heart skipped a little bit. In my 12 years of supporting this club I would never have thought something like this would happen.

In reality isn't European football (outside the champions league) just drab ties against Eastern European opposition in half empty stadia?

Say Reading did a Fulham, and perhaps reach a UEFA cup (or whatever it's called these days) final, even then there's a lot of dull rubbers to get through on rainy Thursday evenings.


To be honest, I would love to say Reading were in Europe, no matter what European competition its in.

And think of it like this. If we were to get into Europe could lead to attracting better, hungry players which could lead to a higher league finish which could lead to Champions League in about 10 years or whatever.


I'll be fooked if I can be arsed travelling around Europe to see some crappy team play Reading. Bring back Bury away.

User avatar
leicsRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2013
Joined: 08 May 2009 17:58

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by leicsRoyal » 24 Jan 2012 21:01

Not sure what to make of these two statements below.

Taken from a news report in 2005.

January 2005 Residing in Monaco, Bates buys Leeds United, the club's debts having been reduced from £103m to £30m. Leeds is now owned by a trust based in Geneva, the Fortress Sports Fund. Its owners are anonymous.

Taken from an article published in 2004,

Anton Zingarevich is a founder of the Brunei-based Fortress Sports Fund, and Kenwright promised: "It is the ambition of myself and the sports fund to return Everton to its former glory."

Does Samuelson work out of Geneva?

User avatar
1871 Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2677
Joined: 24 Jan 2006 16:37
Location: Coming to a village cricket ground near you.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by 1871 Royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:02

Would love to follow my team to deepest darkest Europe.

Plus Stoke have got Valencia in this round so IN for a trip to Spain! :wink:

User avatar
RepressedRoyal
Member
Posts: 230
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 10:48
Location: Basingstoke

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by RepressedRoyal » 24 Jan 2012 21:04

winchester_royal
RepressedRoyal Speed would be a legitimate cause for concern if the money had been dangled and JM said yes with no further questions, I guess I got spooked by rumours that JM has got money problems. The well constructed press conference has made me feel better, but are you saying you have no concerns at all Winchester?


I wouldn't say I have no concerns, my main one now is that it'll all breakdown after all this excitement, but I've got faith in SJM that he will always do right by the club.

And tbh, just look at how old excited the old man has got about it all. We've seen more of him in the last couple of days than we have in the last 5 years. He clearly thinks it's the real deal, and I don't sense any trepidation on his part.

And I like the sound of Anton, he doesn't seem like one of these foreign owners who wants to be treated like a king, the fact that he spent hours&hours talking to Brian about the team etc..

I've just got a good feeling about it all, I suppose some will be nervous about it, but I genuinely think we've got a lot to be excited about in the coming years.

If nothing else it's exciting, and deary me did this season need something to bring it our of dourness.


Fair enough...in all honesty it excites me as well, mainly for the reasons you express, you are right it could all fall through yet, but if it does it will be for the right reasons for the club. I suppose my greatest fear is/was that they might do mini United and borrow against the asset to fund the purchase, leaving us with a higher interest on the debt that SJM charged, that would really leave us in the sh1t. Though I guess SJM and the advisers around him have not allowed that to happen in the deal. Can someone make sure I have go the facts right here, because I am a little lost or dumb as you call me Winchester :D

1/ Russians have paid £25 million for 51% share?
2/ That leaves 49% or just over £24 million in shares left?
3/ Who owns the 49% is it SJM?
4/ Madjeski is currently owed £25 million in loans...is that correct?
5/ If the Russians complete a total buy out in March who get's the additional £24 million?
6/ If it is Madjesji, that is f*cking good return and more than an act of a Knight
7/ Most critically- CAN THE RUSSIANS BORROW AGAINST THE ASSETS TO FUND the takeover?

This may have all been said before, if it has can someone direct me to the post to reassure me.

Cheers


User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22102
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Royal Rother » 24 Jan 2012 21:07

Man Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.


Sorry, can't carry on catching up without commenting on this... :lol: :lol: This is a joke right?

wolsey
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1605
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 15:22
Location: Wishing I was young enough and crass enough to care

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by wolsey » 24 Jan 2012 21:09

Royal Rother
Man Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.


Sorry, can't carry on catching up without commenting on this... :lol: :lol: This is a joke right?


Sadly, in his mind, it's a worry

User avatar
who are ya?
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2629
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Bracknell

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by who are ya? » 24 Jan 2012 21:11

IN for a trip to Belarus

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by winchester_royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:11

RepressedRoyal
winchester_royal
RepressedRoyal Speed would be a legitimate cause for concern if the money had been dangled and JM said yes with no further questions, I guess I got spooked by rumours that JM has got money problems. The well constructed press conference has made me feel better, but are you saying you have no concerns at all Winchester?


I wouldn't say I have no concerns, my main one now is that it'll all breakdown after all this excitement, but I've got faith in SJM that he will always do right by the club.

And tbh, just look at how old excited the old man has got about it all. We've seen more of him in the last couple of days than we have in the last 5 years. He clearly thinks it's the real deal, and I don't sense any trepidation on his part.

And I like the sound of Anton, he doesn't seem like one of these foreign owners who wants to be treated like a king, the fact that he spent hours&hours talking to Brian about the team etc..

I've just got a good feeling about it all, I suppose some will be nervous about it, but I genuinely think we've got a lot to be excited about in the coming years.

If nothing else it's exciting, and deary me did this season need something to bring it our of dourness.


Fair enough...in all honesty it excites me as well, mainly for the reasons you express, you are right it could all fall through yet, but if it does it will be for the right reasons for the club. I suppose my greatest fear is/was that they might do mini United and borrow against the asset to fund the purchase, leaving us with a higher interest on the debt that SJM charged, that would really leave us in the sh1t. Though I guess SJM and the advisers around him have not allowed that to happen in the deal. Can someone make sure I have go the facts right here, because I am a little lost or dumb as you call me Winchester :D

1/ Russians have paid £25 million for 51% share?
2/ That leaves 49% or just over £24 million in shares left?
3/ Who owns the 49% is it SJM?
4/ Madjeski is currently owed £25 million in loans...is that correct?
5/ If the Russians complete a total buy out in March who get's the additional £24 million?
6/ If it is Madjesji, that is f*cking good return and more than an act of a Knight
7/ Most critically- CAN THE RUSSIANS BORROW AGAINST THE ASSETS TO FUND the takeover?

This may have all been said before, if it has can someone direct me to the post to reassure me.

Cheers


I never called you dumb, just hinted that your post was, and that was a tad harsh I'll admit. :P

1. Yes.
2. 49% left yep. The price for those we're not sure of the agreement, or if one has been made.
3. Yep
4. Not sure, check the accounts, but Samuelson seemed to imply the club was debt free so maybe they've reached an agreement.
5. They won't, they're only completing the 51% in March.
6. Madejski will get any money coming from the sale because he owns the club.
7. Someone else will know more about this than me, but I don't think so, or at least if they do it will show up on the club's balance sheet. Plus I don't think they need to since they have investors with money anyway. Plus Madejski wouldn't let them.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:12

1) will pay £25m. Not have.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by winchester_royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:13

Ian Royal 1) will pay £25m. Not have.


By that logic

3) Will do, currently owns em all

User avatar
Red
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1288
Joined: 11 Jun 2010 22:23

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Red » 24 Jan 2012 21:14

who are ya? IN for a trip to Belarus

If you want to go to Belarus, then go to Belarus. And if you want to watch a football match there, then look up a team and go and watch them.

Don't w8 around for Reading FC to play there, even with the Russian cash you may be w8ing a fair while.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by ZacNaloen » 24 Jan 2012 21:15

leicsRoyal Not sure what to make of these two statements below.

Taken from a news report in 2005.

January 2005 Residing in Monaco, Bates buys Leeds United, the club's debts having been reduced from £103m to £30m. Leeds is now owned by a trust based in Geneva, the Fortress Sports Fund. Its owners are anonymous.

Taken from an article published in 2004,

Anton Zingarevich is a founder of the Brunei-based Fortress Sports Fund, and Kenwright promised: "It is the ambition of myself and the sports fund to return Everton to its former glory."

Does Samuelson work out of Geneva?



Well obviously it's the same organisation,.

That said doesn't matter anyway, Bates owns Leeds outright now. And from what I understand the way Leeds was owned up until last year was several companies owning less than 10% of the club. So Fortress Sports must have been a minority or out of the picture prior to last year as well.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:16

winchester_royal
Ian Royal 1) will pay £25m. Not have.


By that logic

3) Will do, currently owns em all


Thought it was fairly important to correct that the money hasn't been paid yet, didn't bother reading the rest of your answers that closely as I didn't think there was a lot I could probably add to them.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22102
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Royal Rother » 24 Jan 2012 21:16

wolsey
Royal Rother
Man Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.


Sorry, can't carry on catching up without commenting on this... :lol: :lol: This is a joke right?


Sadly, in his mind, it's a worry


I really honestly don't follow. Did some people genuinely expect his loans NOT to be repaid? That he would not get that money back? That he would write it off when he sold his shares? How odd.

I must be missing something.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2012 21:18

stupidity?
unbelievable naivity?
basic lack of understanding of "investment" and business?

186 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests

It is currently 14 May 2025 03:42