by leon » 12 Mar 2013 19:59
by loyalroyal4life » 12 Mar 2013 20:03
by ManchesterRoyals » 12 Mar 2013 20:05
leon but it doesn't really say that does it? And if so why didn't the New Reading ie spending big (ish) , hot glamour club in the making kick off in the summer or transfer window?
It's all wishful thinking from a fan trying to justify getting rid of BM.
by Esteban » 12 Mar 2013 20:08
ManchesterRoyalsleon but it doesn't really say that does it? And if so why didn't the New Reading ie spending big (ish) , hot glamour club in the making kick off in the summer or transfer window?
It's all wishful thinking from a fan trying to justify getting rid of BM.
"spending big (ish)" I thought we bid 10 mill for someone from spurs didnt we or am i wrong?
by MeMeMe » 12 Mar 2013 20:10
by ManchesterRoyals » 12 Mar 2013 20:12
EstebanManchesterRoyalsleon but it doesn't really say that does it? And if so why didn't the New Reading ie spending big (ish) , hot glamour club in the making kick off in the summer or transfer window?
It's all wishful thinking from a fan trying to justify getting rid of BM.
"spending big (ish)" I thought we bid 10 mill for someone from spurs didnt we or am i wrong?
This would be the same £10m bid that you've been telling us was smoke and mirrors all along?!
by SPARTA » 12 Mar 2013 20:12
by Royal With Cheese » 12 Mar 2013 20:15
by sandman » 12 Mar 2013 20:26
by Royalee » 12 Mar 2013 20:28
by leon » 13 Mar 2013 11:46
Royalee F*ck the Reading way and all the morons who think we still play in front of 5,000 at Elm Park.
by melonhead » 13 Mar 2013 11:48
leon but it doesn't really say that does it? And if so why didn't the New Reading ie spending big (ish) , hot glamour club in the making kick off in the summer or transfer window?
It's all wishful thinking from a fan trying to justify getting rid of BM.
by mr_number » 13 Mar 2013 12:11
MeMeMe You know, that article resonates with a lot of fans, some who do not know whether they should admit it or not for fear of ridicule. This sounds well with me, I have built and managed technical support teams for organisations and when I do, I look for staff who have character, willingness to learn and will really form part of a team above their technical ability at that moment. Yes steady Eddie handle churners can play their part too, but to lead that lot you need a real 'leader', someone with strength, vision and a degree of flamboyance to drive forwards. McDemott was not that leader like it or not, yes he did a great job but.. We Move On !
Although a lot are fearful of DiCannio, in reality, he could just be the man for the job. If he can reign in his temperament, he could be another 'Chosen One'
by Royal91 » 13 Mar 2013 12:17
by ManchesterRoyals » 13 Mar 2013 12:19
Royal91 I'm not making any judgement until the next permanent manager is installed.
by royal_cornwall » 13 Mar 2013 12:35
leon
It's all wishful thinking from a fan trying to justify getting rid of BM.
by Vision » 13 Mar 2013 12:48
leonRoyalee F*ck the Reading way and all the morons who think we still play in front of 5,000 at Elm Park.
but we don't anymore. the reading way got us a new stadium and two promotions to the top flight for the first time ever. we are a very different club than we were 20 years ago.
by Royal91 » 13 Mar 2013 12:49
ManchesterRoyalsRoyal91 I'm not making any judgement until the next permanent manager is installed.
Agree but hope we start to play some proper football not the hoof ball
by Royalclapper » 13 Mar 2013 13:11
by Royal91 » 13 Mar 2013 13:22
Royalclapper The thing about the 'old Reading way' (under SJM) is that he has a pretty good track record of managerial appointments. Sure, there have been a couple of stinkers, but overall they have been successful and key to our greatest achievements as a football club.
Even if AZ wants to pimp It all up a bit, he could do worse than to cast an eye over SJM's former managerial hit or miss list.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 814 guests