by peterroyal76 » 01 Jan 2014 20:35
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 20:36
peterroyal76 So give us your preferred and available candidate then.
by Avon Royal » 01 Jan 2014 20:36
P!ssed Off If you think there's no manager in the land available that could get Reading playing to a higher standard than the shit we've been served up this season then you're having a laugh.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 20:37
Avon RoyalP!ssed Off If you think there's no manager in the land available that could get Reading playing to a higher standard than the shit we've been served up this season then you're having a laugh.
Well you shouldn't have too much trouble naming plenty of alternatives then.......
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:38
MmmMonsterMunchP!ssed Off
Jokes on you mate. You seem to be the only one attempting to claim it was a tight game.
I said 1st half was a dead heat (which IMO it was). They were better than us 2nd half but right at the death we came back at them. To suggest they are the best team to visit us this season is weird IMO. They weren't that good at all & looked marginally less toothless than we did.
by blueroyals » 01 Jan 2014 20:39
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:45
Avon RoyalP!ssed Off If you think there's no manager in the land available that could get Reading playing to a higher standard than the shit we've been served up this season then you're having a laugh.
Well you shouldn't have too much trouble naming plenty of alternatives then.......
by Millsy » 01 Jan 2014 20:46
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:47
peterroyal76 So give us your preferred and available candidate then.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 20:51
2 world wars, 1 world cup Genuine question:
Under Brian I remember we were a play-when-losing team. We often were rubbish, got to the obligatory 2-0 down then decided we might as well give it a go and started playing more riskily. Sometimes it paid off with good goals, sometimes it didn't. A risk worth taking with nothing to lose. Whilst I'm still gutted over the Brian sacking I understand that was no strategy.
I thankfully didn't go to this match but was this the same sort of scenario? i.e. did we play rubbish then decide to simply throw caution to the wind and attack thereby possibly leaving ourselves very open in the same clueless "well we're going to lose anyway so why not?" manner? Or was it more a case of we got stuck in and actually played some sound secure yet attacking football
If the former, we have problems.
If the latter, there's hope.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:54
2 world wars, 1 world cup Genuine question:
Under Brian I remember we were a play-when-losing team. We often were rubbish, got to the obligatory 2-0 down then decided we might as well give it a go and started playing more riskily. Sometimes it paid off with good goals, sometimes it didn't. A risk worth taking with nothing to lose. Whilst I'm still gutted over the Brian sacking I understand that was no strategy.
I thankfully didn't go to this match but was this the same sort of scenario? i.e. did we play rubbish then decide to simply throw caution to the wind and attack thereby possibly leaving ourselves very open in the same clueless "well we're going to lose anyway so why not?" manner? Or was it more a case of we got stuck in and actually played some sound secure yet attacking football
If the former, we have problems.
If the latter, there's hope.
by Avon Royal » 01 Jan 2014 20:56
P!ssed Off There's no point in me giving you a list, plenty of alternatives have already been touted elsewhere yet still the tedious "replace him with who?" continues.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 20:59
Avon RoyalP!ssed Off There's no point in me giving you a list, plenty of alternatives have already been touted elsewhere yet still the tedious "replace him with who?" continues.
by andrew1957 » 01 Jan 2014 20:59
by Millsy » 01 Jan 2014 21:00
P!ssed OffAvon RoyalP!ssed Off If you think there's no manager in the land available that could get Reading playing to a higher standard than the shit we've been served up this season then you're having a laugh.
Well you shouldn't have too much trouble naming plenty of alternatives then.......
This season Derby, Middlesbrough, Barnsley, Wigan and Watford have all managed to replace their managers in the Championship.
Not sure why some of you lot seem to think it's such an impossible task.
There's no point in me giving you a list, plenty of alternatives have already been touted elsewhere yet still the tedious "replace him with who?" continues.
by Avon Royal » 01 Jan 2014 21:03
P!ssed OffAvon RoyalP!ssed Off There's no point in me giving you a list, plenty of alternatives have already been touted elsewhere yet still the tedious "replace him with who?" continues.
oxf*rd anyone for Christ's sake.
Can't do any worse than the job Adkins is doing.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 21:06
Avon RoyalP!ssed OffAvon Royal
oxf*rd anyone for Christ's sake.
Can't do any worse than the job Adkins is doing.
1 point off the playoffs - yeah, terrible job.
by P!ssed Off » 01 Jan 2014 21:09
2 world wars, 1 world cup Yes and no.
I was an Adkins fan and I'm beginning to lose hope in his ability to make the best of a bad situation to be honest. The "replace with who?" question is actually always valid, but as you say there are many alternatives so you're partly right. The big issue here though is that whilst Adkins may be a bit crap at getting a bad side playing well that's NOT the main reason we're so awful. The main obvious reason staring everyone in the face - which many of us clearly raised alarm bells about in the summer and have now sadly proven to be 100% right about to the hopeful crushing humiliation of club defenders - is the massive ownership problems meaning all of a sudden planned transfers didn't happen and whilst we did have a fairly good quality squad it was deficient in the same key areas we'd be screaming about for over a year. It's analagous to building a very good quality Ferrari then all of a sudden running out of money, unable to buy the final few parts needed to make it run. Without those parts it's useless no matter how high quality the rest of it is. That's the HUGE problem here and whilst I concede that yes a Parky or even a Brian (or dare I say it even a Di Canio) might be able to make the best out of the current situation and maybe even get us up only to be bravely relegated again, it won't address the underlying issue of club ownership, stability and adequate balanced investment. THAT needs to be sorted first and foremost and my guess is that IF AND WHEN we get to the point where we suddenly have healthy investment potential again Adkins will be the man for the long term job that we need (even though I'm losing faith with Adkins' ability in the current situation), not some quick-fix-charlie who is great on a shoestring budget and a tight situation but no good for the longterm.
So changing manager is daft in my opinion UNLESS we can't see the ownership problem resolving in the next year or two in which case I'd definitely say yes let's accept we'll continue to be a financially struggling team and adjust accordingly, saying goodbye to a man who just doesn't fit our circumstances.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Jan 2014 21:11
Avon Royal 1 point off the playoffs - yeah, terrible job.
by Avon Royal » 01 Jan 2014 21:16
P!ssed OffAvon RoyalP!ssed Off
oxf*rd anyone for Christ's sake.
Can't do any worse than the job Adkins is doing.
1 point off the playoffs - yeah, terrible job.
There's a reason I blocked you.
All you are capable of is sarcastic one sentence answers and emoticons.
I don't recall you ever offering anything to a conversation.
Just piss off already.