by ZacNaloen » 17 Feb 2014 11:50
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Feb 2014 11:53
ZacNaloenWycombe Royal Just watched a replay and it looks like the defender got his foot in and pushed the ball away which ran in to Williams path, certainly doesn't look like McAnuff passed it to Williams to me.
I do agree with Vision's point about him creating the space for Williams free header though.
It nearly exactly the same as Mclearys assist the other week to Le Fondre.
Created chaos and space. In Mclearys case Le Fondre pounced as soon as Mclearly lost the ball where as this had a bit more build up.
For what it's worth, Mcanuff showed every part of this game good and bad yesterday (blind alleys being a particulary bug bear of mine). Mostly the good though.
by ZacNaloen » 17 Feb 2014 11:56
by grey_squirrel » 17 Feb 2014 12:08
by bcubed » 17 Feb 2014 12:58
grey_squirrel Lost count of the number of times McAnuff lost possession in the first half. Mostly for dwelling on (or hogging) the ball when there were better options open to him.
His usual flaw in other words.
by floyd__streete » 17 Feb 2014 13:00
NessaFromEldoradoLoyal royal 247 The best performance off season so far
MOTM McAnuff for me
URZZZZZZ
Great report.
You really get a sense of what it was like to be there.
by pea » 17 Feb 2014 13:09
by bcubed » 17 Feb 2014 13:11
LoyalRoyalFan :lol:
all the fighting in the home end, what a lovely club.
by Hampshire Royal » 17 Feb 2014 13:29
by Hampshire Royal » 17 Feb 2014 13:32
No Fixed AbodeLoyalRoyalFan :lol:
all the fighting in the home end, what a lovely club.
Let's not forget Reading fans were fighting with each other at Millwall a couple of weeks ago.
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Feb 2014 13:38
Hampshire Royal His rapid run had nothing to do with making the defence panic, leading to Hill being dragged out of position and had little to do with the goal, of course. Without that run, Williams wouldn't have been able to make the sublime pass to Alf who made a pinpoint cross for Williams to make a beautiful header. All this after Akpan made the original pass to McAnuff.
It's beyond me why, after a brilliant team performance, there are some people who have to criticise individuals, or, indeed, single errors by individuals. We're not Man City or Barcelona and never will be like them. We have a very good team at the moment, consisting of a bunch of very good players at Championship level playing a style of football which will see us promoted. Next season will be a different thing, of course, so the haters can really come to the fore.
by Hampshire Royal » 17 Feb 2014 13:56
by Terminal Boardom » 17 Feb 2014 14:00
Hampshire Royal His rapid run had nothing to do with making the defence panic, leading to Hill being dragged out of position and had little to do with the goal, of course. Without that run, Williams wouldn't have been able to make the sublime pass to Alf who made a pinpoint cross for Williams to make a beautiful header. All this after Akpan made the original pass to McAnuff.
It's beyond me why, after a brilliant team performance, there are some people who have to criticise individuals, or, indeed, single errors by individuals. We're not Man City or Barcelona and never will be like them. We have a very good team at the moment, consisting of a bunch of very good players at Championship level playing a style of football which will see us promoted. Next season will be a different thing, of course, so the haters can really come to the fore.
by wingnut » 17 Feb 2014 14:04
pea McCleary - 5 He's a good player but his camera shot for the goal pissed me off
by bcubed » 17 Feb 2014 14:20
Hampshire Royal I'm sorry if you see what I wrote as a personal criticism. It wasn't. I'm not a great believer in how 'assist' are measured, but there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the most important part of the goal was McAnuff's run. OK, maybe he was tackled at the end of the run, but the pace he was moving at, and the panic generated by his run ensured that the tackle was not a good one. Of all the people who had an important part to play: Akpan, McAnuff, Alf and Williams (one third of the team), the most crucial part was played by McAnuff. It's not you I was talking about when I spoke about the 'haters' but there are people on here who will belittle individual performances even in a very good team performance - the team which is captained by McAnuff.
by Woodcote Royal » 17 Feb 2014 14:27
by Esteban » 17 Feb 2014 14:33
Woodcote Royal Went to Sheff W, saw this one on SKY and, whilst I'm delighted that Adkins has FINALLY seen the light and will be happy to support him now he's getting the best out of this squad, we are, nevertheless, back to the tried and tested methods that all of Pardew, Coppell and McDermott would have adopted from the opening day of the season and wouldn't, therefore, be trailing Leicester by a country mile with 15 games left to play![]()
Nige still deserves much credit for having the balls to throw his grand designs in the bin over Christmas, not to mention the master stoke of turning Obita into such a nifty full back that the shirt is now surely his to lose.
However, this team is now based on the template many of us have been watching for 10 years or more and, surprise, surprise!!! we are witnessing great performances once more from a squad that should have been favourites for automatic promotion.
We have 2 strikers more than justifying their places whilst the impressive Williams and the much maligned Akpan cover the centre ground like Sidwell and Harper of old.
Meanwhile, we have the pace and guile down the flanks to create the chances so sadly lacking when Guthrie was naval gazing as the back four passed the ball amongst themselves![]()
Yep, 4-4-2 is alive and kicking in the Championship. Would this work in the top flight? Probably not but without this change of tack we were never going to put it to the test again any time soon.
Very impressed with all on view.
by melonhead » 17 Feb 2014 14:39
by Woodcote Royal » 17 Feb 2014 14:42
Esteban Serious question: Do you think that the fact that this all changed at the same time Madejski wrestled back control of the club is a mere coincidence, or that Adkins was working to a strategy set- out by Anton?
Not trying to make something out of nothing, just interested in the opinion of someone who has a view on Adkins that is probably the exact opposite of mine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests