by genome » 20 Jul 2016 09:20
by Nameless » 20 Jul 2016 09:24
by George_ » 20 Jul 2016 09:37
Nameless Is the Finn going to be No 1 No 1 ?
by John Smith » 20 Jul 2016 09:38
TFF We were in the north stand under the roof. Good atmosphere for a friendly. The posturing twats took a few rows right down the front and apart from barging into the stewards for the goals didn't get up to much.
The flare was a smoke bomb amongst a few RFC fans in the east stand - looked as lively as the Upper West - it was so pathetic it was brilliant.
Looked good going forward, really ropey at the back.
Apparently they paid a fee for that keeper
by John Smith » 20 Jul 2016 09:41
George_Nameless Is the Finn going to be No 1 No 1 ?
Thought he looked decent. Didn't have a great deal to do in the 1st half but made a smart save (was i the concourse on 45 minutes so didn't see the goal so can't comment on that). 2nd half he made a good 1 on 1 save from the Swindon striker along with a couple of other good saves. Kicking was good apart from 1 which went straight to a Swindon player. Overall pretty impressed. Not sure if he or AAH will be no1, but he showed last night that he would be an improvement on Bond as 2nd choice if so.
by LWJ » 20 Jul 2016 09:43
Nameless Did Campi do anything to make him worth a contract ?
No, looked weak heading, jumped into challenges and conceded a few unnecessary fouls in the middle of the pitch. Expected more of him tbh.
How did Kelly get on ?
Lightweight, anonymous, didn't do anything of note but pass sideways a lot. Expected more again..
Is Dickie a FRC ?
FRC? Future Reading Captain? I think he looked the most composed of the back 4, but still gave away the ball needlessly a couple of times. As it was a friendly it was hard to tell how effective his role of captain really was.
by LWJ » 20 Jul 2016 09:48
by Unbelievable Jeff » 20 Jul 2016 09:49
Nameless any one who went got any thoughts on events on the pitch rather than giving the school kids the publicity they are looking for ?
Did Campi do anything to make him worth a contract ?
How did Kelly get on ?
Is Dickie a FRC ?
Is the Finn going to be No 1 No 1 ?
by Pepe the Horseman » 20 Jul 2016 09:59
by maffff » 20 Jul 2016 10:17
bobby1413 It was the same fckers who were acting up at Blackburn last season. The ones who sit near the top of Y25.
by Forty » 20 Jul 2016 11:17
by Broxroyal » 20 Jul 2016 12:16
by bobby1413 » 20 Jul 2016 12:56
Broxroyal A Reading under 21 X1 won 4-0 at Enfield last night. Not sure why the official site doesn't bother reporting it. A goal for Cardwell and an o.g. - don't know who scored the other two.
There is a bit of a report on the Enfield Town site. I'm afraid I'm not sure how to post the link, as I'm rather an old timer and not great on the computer.
The article says...
Town made a number of changes from the game against Barnet at the weekend. Former VCD Athletic man Nigel Neita made his first Town start, and there were a number of trialists on view.
After five minutes, Reading’s Conor Davis made a good run down the left and crossed for Sam Smith to put narrowly wide. In the 13th minute a Nathan Livings free-kick was hit well off target. Five minutes later, Royals’ keeper Joe Tupper had to be alert to come off his line and head clear from Corey Whitely.
Just after the half-hour mark, Reading had a fair shout for a penalty after Nathan Livings had made contact in the home box with Omar Richards, but referee Michael Mackey wave play on. Shortly before the end of the first period, an almighty scramble in the visitors’ box following a corner on the right by Billy Crook ended with the referee awarding a free-kick to the Royals. Just as the half-time whistle was about to blow, Curtis Ujah hit a firm left-foot shot inches over the Reading crossbar.
Half time: Enfield Town 0 Reading 0
The second half belonged to Reading, who netted four times without reply. Firstly, in the 65th minute, Curtis Ujah got the final unfortunate touch on a loose ball travelling towards the Town goal after the ball had been lost in midfield. Then, five minutes later, the ball was knocked down well from a cross and Harry Cardwell slid the ball home unmarked. The icing on the Royals’ cake was applied by two goals in the 90th minute.
Town had a Corey Whitely effort well over and Nigel Neita was unlucky not to connect with a Mickey Parcell cross. Parcell, arguably Town’s best performer in the second half, was then denied by a fine stop from Tupper and, shortly afterwards, he also had a good header just wide of the mark but, in truth, Town were well beaten on the night.
Town starting line-up: Nathan McDonald, Mickey Parcell, Tyler Campbell, Claudiu Vilcu, Curtis Ujah, Trialist, Nathan Livings, Billy Crook, Corey Whitely, Trialist, Nigel Neita. Substitutes: Lee Brennan, Jordan Lockie, Imedd Kartita and three other trialists.
by maffff » 20 Jul 2016 13:59
by stewietait » 20 Jul 2016 15:03
by SydenhamRoyal » 20 Jul 2016 15:51
by TFF » 20 Jul 2016 16:05
SydenhamRoyal who was the number 5 last night, playing at right back in the second half?
in my considered opinion he was shit, and there was universal consensus on that point from everyone around
by LWJ » 20 Jul 2016 16:19
SydenhamRoyal who was the number 5 last night, playing at right back in the second half?
in my considered opinion he was shit, and there was universal consensus on that point from everyone around
liked our keeper, enjoyed some of our wing play early on, but other than it was pretty poor fare
by muirinho » 20 Jul 2016 16:42
TFFSydenhamRoyal who was the number 5 last night, playing at right back in the second half?
in my considered opinion he was shit, and there was universal consensus on that point from everyone around
Not sure who he was but 'greed. Needed far too much time on the ball and was far too easily closed down/forced into an error.
RB in the first half (Keown?) was better but their left winger left him for dead on more than one occasion.
by LWJ » 20 Jul 2016 16:53
muirinhoTFFSydenhamRoyal who was the number 5 last night, playing at right back in the second half?
in my considered opinion he was shit, and there was universal consensus on that point from everyone around
Not sure who he was but 'greed. Needed far too much time on the ball and was far too easily closed down/forced into an error.
RB in the first half (Keown?) was better but their left winger left him for dead on more than one occasion.
Wasn't there, but looking at first half team and second half team, it looks like Sean Long was there in the first half, and Keown replaced him at half time.
Tennai Watson went to the Netherlands, and I'm pretty sure played RB, neither of the above two went - even though they had squad numbers last season, and Watson didn't. Has he leap-frogged them?
Sounds like we'll definitely need a RB if/when Chris Gunter goes - Watson is only 19 and as far as I know has never been out on loan even. And the two that are more senior to him don't sound like they are much cop.
In fact we may well need an RB even if Gunts stays - he has had zero competition for the last two years tbh.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 180 guests