Snowflake RoyalHound if the defence had done its job properly, the 4-4-2 wouldn't really have been a problem.
The fact is the players we have in CM aren't good enough. I don't think Ipswich dominated our midfield any more than any other team has when we have shoved 3 in there. When was the last time we dominated a game in midfield - and yet we've played 3 there nearly every game. DO people think we'd have won if we'd gone 4-3-3?
If we had a decent solid DM I'm sure he would have been played. Fact is the choices available are all poor. If Edwards, Evans or Joey had been part of a 2 they'd have been equally poor, if not worse imo.
That would hold more weight if Kelly, Kermorgant and Barrow hadn't started off the errors that led to the first two goals between them.
We had literally no one capable of doing any decent defensive work across our entire middle four. Any side where that's true deserves to lose and the manager has to take a big slice of the blame.
Clearly Clement can't be judged yet and clearly the players are far more at fault for our predicament. But he dropped a massive one with his selection for Ipswich.
I'm 99.9% confident we don't lose that 0-4 with Edwards, Evans or Berg in for Swift / Kelly / Kermorgant
but like I've said - we've played 3 in the middle, normally with Edwards, Evans or Joey in there, and won 3 games in 26.
I don't for one minute think that selection or set up cost us anything. It was the performances of the players that did that