Snowflake Royalmaffff Embargo ends tomorrow
Give us a clue. Money in? Deadweight out?
Hired some FFP loophole lawyers?
No more detail - it's what José said in an interview in Portugal
by maffff » 09 Jun 2019 19:40
Snowflake Royalmaffff Embargo ends tomorrow
Give us a clue. Money in? Deadweight out?
Hired some FFP loophole lawyers?
by Simon's Church » 09 Jun 2019 20:41
by CountryRoyal » 09 Jun 2019 20:45
by Snowflake Royal » 09 Jun 2019 23:12
CountryRoyal GYLFI’S COMING HOME
by URZZZZ » 10 Jun 2019 00:56
Denver Royal3pointsCrowbar6753
My thoughts exactly, if we can keep Jose and trim the squad even more then i would be reasonably happy. With a smaller and more hungry squad with a full pre-season under their belts i really think we could push for a mid table finish. It would also be nice to see a few more youngsters having breakout seasons from the U-23s.
I would expect Loader and Oliese to featue more and to continue their improvement, and Rinhomota should get even better which is a huge plus, and anything else will be a bonus.
A fellow Nobber asked the question regarding three teams worse than us? Well its tough to pick three teams worse than us but i do believe theirs a group of maybe 6 teams in the same boat as us.
Wigan - Almost identical to us i believe.
QPR - Fell away badly at the end of last season which often spells danger.
Barnsley - Perennial YO-YO team.
Blackburn - Over achieved last season and may struggle.
Millwall - Same old Millwall lol. Lots of guts but not much class.
Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
I reckon you can add Charlton to that list, and possibly Birmingham and Sheff Weds. Birmingham will presumably be selling lots of players to keep FFP balanced this summer, including Che Adams. Sheff Weds have also started a big clear out thought you’d expect Bruce to keep them mid table regardless of players.
Overall FFP may have the benefit of teams reducing squad sizes which will create opportunities for academy players. This can only be good for English football in the long run.
...and hopefully better for us, since we have an academy while other clubs don't.
by URZZZZ » 10 Jun 2019 01:04
Crowbar6753Snowflake Royal We're in the same dangerous territory we've been in for years.
But a lot of the repairs have started. A tight, well motivated, drilled and dedicated squad can take you a long way in the Championship and there's plenty of promise in our Academy.
With the work we're doing, even if the worst happens and we go down we'll be much better placed to recover than we would have been this season.
My thoughts exactly, if we can keep Jose and trim the squad even more then i would be reasonably happy. With a smaller and more hungry squad with a full pre-season under their belts i really think we could push for a mid table finish. It would also be nice to see a few more youngsters having breakout seasons from the U-23s.
I would expect Loader and Oliese to featue more and to continue their improvement, and Rinhomota should get even better which is a huge plus, and anything else will be a bonus.
A fellow Nobber asked the question regarding three teams worse than us? Well its tough to pick three teams worse than us but i do believe theirs a group of maybe 6 teams in the same boat as us.
Wigan - Almost identical to us i believe.
QPR - Fell away badly at the end of last season which often spells danger.
Barnsley - Perennial YO-YO team.
Blackburn - Over achieved last season and may struggle.
Millwall - Same old Millwall lol. Lots of guts but not much class.
Luton - May start well but will get found out quickly. The Champ is a big step up in class.
by Forbury Lion » 10 Jun 2019 08:40
This proposal may see the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal etc cast their nets even wider than they already do and snap up more of the local talent that might otherwise go to local academies like Reading's..... If there was a cap on Foreign players that extended to EU players, then Arsenal/Chelsea etc will snap up just as many players, only they would all be from England/UK leaving slim pickings for everyone else.URZZZZ Honestly think they should make a new rule with "X" amount of academy players in the squad, and making it a reasonable amount. This should stop the ridiculous amount of foreign players (Chelsea Arsenal Europe league final anyone) and could hopefully ease money problems if the money can be distributed right down from the bottom
by URZZZZ » 11 Jun 2019 00:40
Forbury LionThis proposal may see the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal etc cast their nets even wider than they already do and snap up more of the local talent that might otherwise go to local academies like Reading's..... If there was a cap on Foreign players that extended to EU players, then Arsenal/Chelsea etc will snap up just as many players, only they would all be from England/UK leaving slim pickings for everyone else.URZZZZ Honestly think they should make a new rule with "X" amount of academy players in the squad, and making it a reasonable amount. This should stop the ridiculous amount of foreign players (Chelsea Arsenal Europe league final anyone) and could hopefully ease money problems if the money can be distributed right down from the bottom
Also a bit harsh on late bloomers signed from non-league, past examples being Dave KItson, Ian Wright. Both English and home grown, they just grew up playing footy in the park/Sunday league rather than at an accademy.
by Denver Royal » 11 Jun 2019 01:38
URZZZZForbury LionThis proposal may see the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal etc cast their nets even wider than they already do and snap up more of the local talent that might otherwise go to local academies like Reading's..... If there was a cap on Foreign players that extended to EU players, then Arsenal/Chelsea etc will snap up just as many players, only they would all be from England/UK leaving slim pickings for everyone else.URZZZZ Honestly think they should make a new rule with "X" amount of academy players in the squad, and making it a reasonable amount. This should stop the ridiculous amount of foreign players (Chelsea Arsenal Europe league final anyone) and could hopefully ease money problems if the money can be distributed right down from the bottom
Also a bit harsh on late bloomers signed from non-league, past examples being Dave KItson, Ian Wright. Both English and home grown, they just grew up playing footy in the park/Sunday league rather than at an accademy.
Some good points
Difficult to try and find an optimal solution. I just found it astounding that out of 22 players in the Europe League final, only one was English. Even then, if Bellerin is fit he's ahead of Maitland Niles. And to me, that's just wrong. And that's not even academy players, that's only English
by URZZZZ » 11 Jun 2019 01:48
Denver RoyalURZZZZForbury Lion This proposal may see the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal etc cast their nets even wider than they already do and snap up more of the local talent that might otherwise go to local academies like Reading's..... If there was a cap on Foreign players that extended to EU players, then Arsenal/Chelsea etc will snap up just as many players, only they would all be from England/UK leaving slim pickings for everyone else.
Also a bit harsh on late bloomers signed from non-league, past examples being Dave KItson, Ian Wright. Both English and home grown, they just grew up playing footy in the park/Sunday league rather than at an accademy.
Some good points
Difficult to try and find an optimal solution. I just found it astounding that out of 22 players in the Europe League final, only one was English. Even then, if Bellerin is fit he's ahead of Maitland Niles. And to me, that's just wrong. And that's not even academy players, that's only English
Wrong forum, but to me Southgate started wrong team/system vs Netherlands (was he pressured?). Some of that team don’t start regularly in their club footy. Sterling captain?
Netherlands then looked rather ordinary vs Portugal subsequently in the final.
by Denver Royal » 11 Jun 2019 01:53
URZZZZDenver RoyalURZZZZ
Some good points
Difficult to try and find an optimal solution. I just found it astounding that out of 22 players in the Europe League final, only one was English. Even then, if Bellerin is fit he's ahead of Maitland Niles. And to me, that's just wrong. And that's not even academy players, that's only English
Wrong forum, but to me Southgate started wrong team/system vs Netherlands (was he pressured?). Some of that team don’t start regularly in their club footy. Sterling captain?
Netherlands then looked rather ordinary vs Portugal subsequently in the final.
Yeah did mention that in one of the other threads about his XI not being representative of club form. Not sure who would pressure him and as someone did say, at least he is giving some players a chance, Rice, Sancho, Hudson Odoi etc. Just too many dubious ones at the same time
Didn’t watch Netherlands Portugal but saw the stats after it and it looked pretty one sided
by SpaghettiHoop » 11 Jun 2019 13:40
Denver RoyalURZZZZDenver Royal I’m approaching 60 and it wrankles
by earleypr » 17 Jun 2019 10:03
by Maneki Neko » 18 Jun 2019 08:58
by Hound » 18 Jun 2019 09:40
by Wallsy » 18 Jun 2019 09:58
Maneki Neko jose was wrong.
couple this statement with his we need to sort our transfers early statement that he made at the end of last season, he must be pretty pissed off
by andrew1957 » 23 Jul 2019 15:07
by WestYorksRoyal » 23 Jul 2019 15:11
by Royalwaster » 23 Jul 2019 15:20
andrew1957 I think our business so far this summer (assuming we do get Ejaria and Miazga) has been much more positive than I expected. I can only assume that the Stacey money and selling Kelly/Bod gave us the wriggle room to add some players.
I don't know if it is just me but when I look at the squad being assembled and with a strong group in the Academy, I think that if we make a good start to the season (a big "if") that a top half finish is now quite possible and perhaps even a push towards the play offs.
Ideally we just need an attacking midfielder and a striker to top things off.
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Jul 2019 16:42
Users browsing this forum: Orion1871 and 302 guests