NathStPaul We can all read Wikipedia pal.
It's from The Athletic who did an article on it a few months back. Maybe they read wikipedia.
by Greatwesternline » 06 Oct 2023 15:13
NathStPaul We can all read Wikipedia pal.
by traff » 06 Oct 2023 18:45
HoundSnowflake RoyalCrowbar6753 Would like to see 4-2-3-1 personally. Two deep lying DMs giving the defense extra support when needed and the three AMs giving width and attacking support to the lone striker.
Both Ballard and Kelvin E seem to have the pace and strength to play the lone forward role, plus i think an attacking midfield role would be perfect for Vickers.
So it this:
Button
Abrefa Abbey Dean NGW
Hutch Craig
Vickers Wing Knibbs
Kelvin E
Savage and Azeez need a break as they're just not contributing atm and can be used as impact subs. Not saying this will work but it gives us more width and a stronger presence in midfield with Craig and Hutch. Vickers, Wing and Knibbs should have enough about them to get the ball in the Kelvin up front.
This could also be used in a 4-3-3
Button
Abrefa Abbey Dean NGW
Craig Hutch Wing
Vickers Kelvin E Knibbs
Yep, more viable options.
I think it's worth saying as well, that formations are largely just short hand for how you want your players to play usually.
Unfortunately 4-2-2-2 is short hand for playing narrow to unnecessarily congest the centre of the pitch in the attacking third whilst bypassing your midfield and leaving your fullbacks high, out of position and exposed.
If I was to manage an 11 aside team I’d prob play 4-2-3-1. But it’s barely any different from 4-2-2-2 - the attacking mid ‘2’ still tend to give wide options just not as wide.
I also wouldn’t want to see Kelv as a ‘1’ up front as he’d likely be too isolated
There’s some good theory behind 4-2-2-2 and it has worked elsewhere. We just need to do it better. Like I’ve said main issue for me is this formation you really shouldn’t be getting cut through in defensive mid. You can make up for the failings if you dominate the areas you are meant to but we are not
by Snowflake Royal » 06 Oct 2023 19:39
HoundSnowflake Royal Yep, more viable options.
I think it's worth saying as well, that formations are largely just short hand for how you want your players to play usually.
Unfortunately 4-2-2-2 is short hand for playing narrow to unnecessarily congest the centre of the pitch in the attacking third whilst bypassing your midfield and leaving your fullbacks high, out of position and exposed.
If I was to manage an 11 aside team I’d prob play 4-2-3-1. But it’s barely any different from 4-2-2-2 - the attacking mid ‘2’ still tend to give wide options just not as wide.
I also wouldn’t want to see Kelv as a ‘1’ up front as he’d likely be too isolated
There’s some good theory behind 4-2-2-2 and it has worked elsewhere. We just need to do it better. Like I’ve said main issue for me is this formation you really shouldn’t be getting cut through in defensive mid. You can make up for the failings if you dominate the areas you are meant to but we are not
by Hound » 06 Oct 2023 20:12
Snowflake RoyalHoundSnowflake Royal Yep, more viable options.
I think it's worth saying as well, that formations are largely just short hand for how you want your players to play usually.
Unfortunately 4-2-2-2 is short hand for playing narrow to unnecessarily congest the centre of the pitch in the attacking third whilst bypassing your midfield and leaving your fullbacks high, out of position and exposed.
If I was to manage an 11 aside team I’d prob play 4-2-3-1. But it’s barely any different from 4-2-2-2 - the attacking mid ‘2’ still tend to give wide options just not as wide.
I also wouldn’t want to see Kelv as a ‘1’ up front as he’d likely be too isolated
There’s some good theory behind 4-2-2-2 and it has worked elsewhere. We just need to do it better. Like I’ve said main issue for me is this formation you really shouldn’t be getting cut through in defensive mid. You can make up for the failings if you dominate the areas you are meant to but we are not
Theory, schmeary. Its shit. Maybe a top club in an uneven league makes it work. But that's just the same as the idiots who tried to play like Barcelona without being streets ahead of 90% of their opposition.
by Royality creeps In » 06 Oct 2023 20:15
by morganb » 07 Oct 2023 13:40
by Hound » 07 Oct 2023 13:53
morganb Holmes, NGW and Camara all off the coach today according to Twitter reports
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Oct 2023 13:55
Houndmorganb Holmes, NGW and Camara all off the coach today according to Twitter reports
Came off the coach or weren’t on it in the first place?
by Ascotexgunner » 07 Oct 2023 14:02
morganb Holmes, NGW and Camara all off the coach today according to Twitter reports
by Sutekh » 07 Oct 2023 14:02
by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Oct 2023 14:02
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Oct 2023 14:03
by Hound » 07 Oct 2023 14:06
Snowflake Royal What a fukwit. Learning nothing.
by Sutekh » 07 Oct 2023 14:09
by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Oct 2023 14:10
HoundSnowflake Royal What a fukwit. Learning nothing.
He’s learnt that we’re a better side with Knibbs in and Wing and Hutch are the best bet at CM
He’s also learnt that it’s worth
involving NGW and Holmes again
If ‘learnt’ means agreeing with everything you say then no he hasn’t learnt anything
I actually don’t think Binden has been bad at RB tbh. Would have changed it myself but don’t see it as a big issue
by Royal_jimmy » 07 Oct 2023 14:12
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Oct 2023 14:18
WestYorksRoyalHoundSnowflake Royal What a fukwit. Learning nothing.
He’s learnt that we’re a better side with Knibbs in and Wing and Hutch are the best bet at CM
He’s also learnt that it’s worth
involving NGW and Holmes again
If ‘learnt’ means agreeing with everything you say then no he hasn’t learnt anything
I actually don’t think Binden has been bad at RB tbh. Would have changed it myself but don’t see it as a big issue
Formation has fundamental flaws away from home. He doesn't seem interested in changing.
by The Royal Forester » 07 Oct 2023 14:31
Sutekh So is Mola missing because he's suspended or has Selles worked out that he's cr@p at last?
by Mid Sussex Royal » 07 Oct 2023 14:33
by Sutekh » 07 Oct 2023 14:33
The Royal ForesterSutekh So is Mola missing because he's suspended or has Selles worked out that he's cr@p at last?
Suspended. The Ref. made a mistake in "correcting" his (non) mistake as he HAD booked him twice, so should not have brought him back on!
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry and 297 guests