loyalroyal4life Hopefully we can sneak a draw out of this 1.
1st 30 min was decent by us!!
I think we could see much more cards and perhaps a penalty cos Mr WALTON is something else
To be fair, you don't deserve to be down
by Melbguy » 26 Dec 2007 13:53
loyalroyal4life Hopefully we can sneak a draw out of this 1.
1st 30 min was decent by us!!
I think we could see much more cards and perhaps a penalty cos Mr WALTON is something else
by Ian Royal » 26 Dec 2007 13:54
Handsome Man Time to take the loss?
Substitute Kitson and Doyle/Murty to save them for another and take Hunt off to prevent the second yellow, in case West Ham players decide he needs another booing.
by RoyalBlue » 26 Dec 2007 13:54
MelbguyAvon Royal For those of you that haven't seen the pictures, the red card is easily one of the top five worst sending off decisions ever.
Nailed on red disgraceful challenge
by Bristol Paul » 26 Dec 2007 13:59
by Avon Royal » 26 Dec 2007 13:59
MelbguyAvon Royal For those of you that haven't seen the pictures, the red card is easily one of the top five worst sending off decisions ever.
Nailed on red disgraceful challenge
by RoyalBlue » 26 Dec 2007 14:00
Avon RoyalMelbguyAvon Royal For those of you that haven't seen the pictures, the red card is easily one of the top five worst sending off decisions ever.
Nailed on red disgraceful challenge
You are Hoddle and I claim my five pounds!
by Ian Royal » 26 Dec 2007 14:01
by Avon Royal » 26 Dec 2007 14:02
Bristol Paul Reading World commentary says that the sending off was deserved, it was 2 footed and players know the rules on that. Just because not all refs take such decisive action is irrelevant, Gunnarsson know its a red so shouldn't have done it.
by URZZZZZZZZ » 26 Dec 2007 14:03
by Very near...far away » 26 Dec 2007 14:05
by RoyalBlue » 26 Dec 2007 14:05
Ian Royal stupid stupid stupid challenge and worthy of a card, but he got the ball and didn't touch the player. Yellow and a strong talking to should have been enough.
by loyalroyal4life » 26 Dec 2007 14:06
Avon RoyalBristol Paul Reading World commentary says that the sending off was deserved, it was 2 footed and players know the rules on that. Just because not all refs take such decisive action is irrelevant, Gunnarsson know its a red so shouldn't have done it.
So where in the rules does it say that a two footed tackle is a red card?
by Ian Royal » 26 Dec 2007 14:07
RoyalBlueIan Royal stupid stupid stupid challenge and worthy of a card, but he got the ball and didn't touch the player. Yellow and a strong talking to should have been enough.
I think most of the West Ham fans were as surprised as us to see Pratt Walton whip out the red!
As for Hunt's yellow, if Walton had any character, he would watch the video later and be big enough to rescind the card.
by Bristol Paul » 26 Dec 2007 14:07
by Handsome Man » 26 Dec 2007 14:09
by Handsome Man » 26 Dec 2007 14:10
by Avon Royal » 26 Dec 2007 14:11
Bristol Paul Refs guidelines this season are that a 2 footed tackle is a straight red card
by bobby1413 » 26 Dec 2007 14:14
by bobby1413 » 26 Dec 2007 14:15
by Bristol Paul » 26 Dec 2007 14:17
Avon RoyalBristol Paul Refs guidelines this season are that a 2 footed tackle is a straight red card
Only if it's dangerous........
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 885 guests