by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2008 13:15
Hoop BlahDirk Gently s I said yesterday, ther's got to be a mid=point between the extremes of "total shambles" and "no problems."
We're there but the few who are happy to nail their flag to that mast are minimal.
I think that wrong. I think most are in that middle band. Some are suggesting solutions and possibly criticising the club/Coppell for the short comings that have created the problems, but they're still pretty much in the camp of "we can easily pull out of this" and not "we're doomed end the season now" that you seem to be placing everyone.
I guess it somes down to an individuals perspective, and we're quite used to your perspective being that the club can do, and has done, no wrong (that's not meact to place you in with the others in the "smelling of roses" pigeon hole).
by SpaceCruiser » 15 Jan 2008 13:22
by Hoop Blah » 15 Jan 2008 13:23
Dirk Gently Fair enough - I understand why I might be seen that way. I'd personally put myself in the "I know more about how the club is run and who it's run by than most people, and this gives me confidence that they'll be doing everything possible to find a solution instead of fiddling while Rome burns as many seem to suggest is happening."
Do all these people wringing their hands in despair really think that the problems that they've seen and described have really not also been seen by SC and everyone else at the club? Presumably not from many of the posters on here....
by Platypuss » 15 Jan 2008 13:23
PlatypussSpaceCruiserPlatypussDirk Gently When people are calling for "Coppell out" and when someone is caling the club "a total shambles" I'm not so sure.
Who has seriously said "Coppell out"? Name (and shame) and quote.
The twelve who voted "Yes" in that poll.
Please try again. I asked for names and quotes.
by West Stand Flash » 15 Jan 2008 13:26
Dirk GentlyHoop BlahDirk Gently s I said yesterday, ther's got to be a mid=point between the extremes of "total shambles" and "no problems."
We're there but the few who are happy to nail their flag to that mast are minimal.
I think that wrong. I think most are in that middle band. Some are suggesting solutions and possibly criticising the club/Coppell for the short comings that have created the problems, but they're still pretty much in the camp of "we can easily pull out of this" and not "we're doomed end the season now" that you seem to be placing everyone.
I guess it somes down to an individuals perspective, and we're quite used to your perspective being that the club can do, and has done, no wrong (that's not meact to place you in with the others in the "smelling of roses" pigeon hole).
Fair enough - I understand why I might be seen that way. I'd personally put myself in the "I know more about how the club is run and who it's run by than most people, and this gives me confidence that they'll be doing everything possible to find a solution instead of fiddling while Rome burns as many seem to suggest is happening."
Do all these people wringing their hands in despair really think that the problems that they've seen and described have really not also been seen by SC and everyone else at the club? Presumably not from many of the posters on here....
by anR » 15 Jan 2008 13:27
Hoop Blah I think he's a thoughtful and intelligent manager but I would like to see him actually try and change things around little bit
by West Stand Flash » 15 Jan 2008 13:28
anRHoop Blah I think he's a thoughtful and intelligent manager but I would like to see him actually try and change things around little bit
When he does this, be it when we are missing a few players for some reason or changing the formation, don't we normally get stuffed?
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 15 Jan 2008 13:30
Hoop BlahDirk Gently Fair enough - I understand why I might be seen that way. I'd personally put myself in the "I know more about how the club is run and who it's run by than most people, and this gives me confidence that they'll be doing everything possible to find a solution instead of fiddling while Rome burns as many seem to suggest is happening."
Do all these people wringing their hands in despair really think that the problems that they've seen and described have really not also been seen by SC and everyone else at the club? Presumably not from many of the posters on here....
Fair comment, you've got an insight which gives you a different perspective at times.
It does sometimes come accross as though you can't see the short comings of the powers that be though, and the readiness to which you jump to their defence is often quite sychophantic. I'm very pleased with who we have running the club, and very thankful that between them Mr M, Coppel, Hammond and even Howe are running our club and that they have the best interests of the club at heart.
That doesnt stop me from thinking that sometimes I disagree with aspects of what actually happens.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 15 Jan 2008 13:32
PC? It's just plain wrong. It'd be like calling Marcus or Convey "Canadian".sucatraps For Darius we used to sing:- "He's our Polish international" is it pc or appropriate to use:- "He's our 'Slovakian international" for Marek? or are Czech's insulted to be lumped in with Slovakia?
by anR » 15 Jan 2008 13:33
West Stand FlashanRHoop Blah I think he's a thoughtful and intelligent manager but I would like to see him actually try and change things around little bit
When he does this, be it when we are missing a few players for some reason or changing the formation, don't we normally get stuffed?
Think he is more talking about new personnel?
by Gordons Cumming » 15 Jan 2008 13:33
by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2008 13:34
Hoop BlahDirk Gently Fair enough - I understand why I might be seen that way. I'd personally put myself in the "I know more about how the club is run and who it's run by than most people, and this gives me confidence that they'll be doing everything possible to find a solution instead of fiddling while Rome burns as many seem to suggest is happening."
Do all these people wringing their hands in despair really think that the problems that they've seen and described have really not also been seen by SC and everyone else at the club? Presumably not from many of the posters on here....
Fair comment, you've got an insight which gives you a different perspective at times.
It does sometimes come accross as though you can't see the short comings of the powers that be though, and the readiness to which you jump to their defence is often quite sychophantic. I'm very pleased with who we have running the club, and very thankful that between them Mr M, Coppel, Hammond and even Howe are running our club and that they have the best interests of the club at heart.
That doesnt stop me from thinking that sometimes I disagree with aspects of what actually happens.
by West Stand Flash » 15 Jan 2008 13:34
anRWest Stand FlashanRHoop Blah I think he's a thoughtful and intelligent manager but I would like to see him actually try and change things around little bit
When he does this, be it when we are missing a few players for some reason or changing the formation, don't we normally get stuffed?
Think he is more talking about new personnel?
Oh, I see, just like Tommy Burns did, ok then.
by SpaceCruiser » 15 Jan 2008 13:35
West Stand Flash Considering the problems at the club are so glaringly obvious, why have Coppell, Hammond, Howe & Madejski done nothing about it.
PlatypussPlatypussSpaceCruiserPlatypussDirk Gently When people are calling for "Coppell out" and when someone is caling the club "a total shambles" I'm not so sure.
Who has seriously said "Coppell out"? Name (and shame) and quote.
The twelve who voted "Yes" in that poll.
Please try again. I asked for names and quotes.
Well?
bobby1413 I think we should offer Neil Warnock the job.
RoyalBluePEARCEYshadesrwrf I've never rated Steve Coppell.
Presumably this is a tongue in cheek comment!!!!!!!!!!! So I wont pass comment.
Certainly any manager that presides over a record breaking 106 league points followed by 8th place in the Premiership on a fraction of the budget of his peers (who happen to think he has been their best during that period) deserves time to sort the current malaise out. He has made mistakes, no-one is perfect but if we go down he deserves the chance to bring us back up again. I believe most Reading fans would go along with that.
Do you really think that if we go down he will want to stay around to fix things?!
I fear that if we go down without having tried everything possible to stay up (and that includes some big signings, even if only to get us out of the shyte in the short term) Steve Coppell will rapidly go from hero to zero in many people's eyes.
I suspect even some of the current supporters/RTGs will change their views if they have time in the CCC to reflect on how easily/casually/criminally we threw away our extremely hard won PL status.
So SC, if the board really are backing you with the money/wages you need to sign the players that are needed to maintain that PL status then please make use of that support without further delay.
If, on the other hand, that backing is more spin than cash, then blow the whistle. It is the board that owe you a great debt of loyalty, not the other way around. You would not deserve to take the blame for their failings.
by Platypuss » 15 Jan 2008 13:37
by Alan Partridge » 15 Jan 2008 13:39
Platypuss Ok, thanks for comprehensively proving that you can't manage it.
I wonder if Dirk will have any more joy?
by Gordons Cumming » 15 Jan 2008 13:40
Platypuss Ok, thanks for comprehensively proving that you can't manage it.
I wonder if Dirk will have any more joy?
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 15 Jan 2008 13:42
Alan PartridgePlatypuss Ok, thanks for comprehensively proving that you can't manage it.
I wonder if Dirk will have any more joy?
Exactly. No one has posted up a serious post saying 'Coppell should go' anywhere on HNA. It's the RTG's (i hate that phrase but can't think of another) who instead of listening and taking others views on board, go back to the schoolboy reaction of 'well Coppell out then' whenever anyone questions ANYTHING to do with RFC. It's quite funny really.
by RoyalBlue » 15 Jan 2008 13:45
brendywendyMan FridayHoop Blah I thought most of the 'negative' posters were being reasonably balanced and saying, words to the effect of, we have a good chance of being relegated if we carry on like we are and don't do something to add to the squad in this window.
That's been jumped on by many of the apologists and RTG's to the extent that views have been polarised so that you think we're fine and dandy or doomed to relegation. Dirk, your post just exemplifies how it's neigh on impossible to voice an opinion right now without it being pigeon holed into one camp or the other.
Personally, I keep trying to repeat my feeling that we are right in the midst of a serious relegation battle. The club needs to reinforce a woefully under strength squad in order to try and reduce the chance of relegation. I'm still of the opinion that I think we'll be unfortunate to go down because I think at least 3 teams will finish below us BUT with the addition of 2 or 3 players in the right positions who can step into and hopefully improve the side NOW we'll be in a better position to ensure we have more than 3 teams below us.
This place is getting more and more like a tabloid/x-factor type pantomime with all the instant polarisation of all posts.
Absolutely spot on - the whole posting. Reflects my views exactly.
i think people are upset by the implication that reading are not, and will not do anything else during the window that gets on most RTG peoples nerves. moan at the end of jan, & dont moan about made up stuff
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests