by Cookie » 19 Jul 2008 20:41
by papereyes » 19 Jul 2008 21:04
Sarah Star Maybe Kitson rang in to say he had cold feet?
by The whole year inn » 19 Jul 2008 21:08
earleyroyalfriday fan leave the footbal to us kowledgeable ones
This is surely a wind up.
by The whole year inn » 19 Jul 2008 21:09
friday fan Newcastle appointe Dennis Wise as DOF and I can agree with that but not Hammond.
by Arch » 19 Jul 2008 22:15
So you tell me, on the basis of all the available evidence, did Kitson call in and say he had a cold, or did the club make that up?PlatypussArchRoyal Lady I suppose it does if you don't want everyone to catch it. I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but I doubt we'll ever know the truth.
This is really the point isn't it. If you want to, you can insist the club is lying about all sorts of things, but in reality there's no hard evidence. People who jump on the lying bandwagon are simply showing their colours and no more. It doesn't add up to an argument. In fact the vast majority of what passes for discussion on this board these days is basically tribal posturing.
Seeing as how it has been established that the club did a deal with Cambridge earlier in the week, and that they must have given Stoke permission to talk to DK, it does stretch incredulity rather a bit too much to suggest they were completely in the dark at the time of snifflegate.
by Platypuss » 20 Jul 2008 11:05
by papereyes » 20 Jul 2008 12:15
by RoyalBlue » 20 Jul 2008 12:21
by papereyes » 20 Jul 2008 12:27
RoyalBlue It matters a bit more than that because the club appear to want supporters to keep backing them with their cash but, at the same time, seem happy to continually give them the mushroom treatment.
by Ian Royal » 20 Jul 2008 14:43
RoyalBlueRoyal Lady To be fair, some quote I saw a few days ago said that "Kitson had rung in and said he had a cold" and Coppell had said they'd told him to stay home as they didn't want the rest of them catching the sniffles or something. Kitson could have told them he had a cold, except he didn't really. Or he could actually have had a cold, having a cold won't stop you going for an interview if you really want a job, nor will it make you fail a medical.
Come off it! RFC were fully aware that both they and Kitson were in the final stages of negotiations with Stoke and, by the sound of it RFC with Cambridge United. Having a cold doesn't stop a fit footballer playing football either.Ian Royal Interesting that we've got to the premiership under Hammond, Coppell and Madejski and yet none of them know what they are doing and are holding the club back.
Did you all really think that once we were there that we'd stay there for decades? Or that it would just be a bit of a hard slog but mid table or better would keep happening? The first set of problems and it's whining about how crap the people in charge are.
Half of you were about ready to annoint Madejski and Coppell as Gods a year ago. The fickle over reactions and vitriolic propaganda spouted on here by some sickens me.
And perhaps your idol Mr Madjeski might have got a little less stick if he hadn't mouthed off so much about our PL ambitions, the fact that fans were paying more to 'enable the club to compete effectively at that level', that we intended to be around for some time at that level, give it our best shot at staying up etc.etc. He spectacularly failed to walk the talk, and there doesn't appear to be much walking now we are back in the Championship either!
by Ian Royal » 20 Jul 2008 14:51
papereyes Kitson may have had a cold, he may even have missed the game because he had a cold.
But he and the club had also sorted out all this while he had a cold.
Furthermore, it matters about this much
by Forbury Lion » 20 Jul 2008 14:59
Must have been lonely standing on those terraces for the last 10 years.friday fan By the way I stood on the teraces at Ep since 1965 so I have seen a bit of RFC
by Streets » 20 Jul 2008 15:03
Forbury LionMust have been lonely standing on those terraces for the last 10 years.friday fan By the way I stood on the teraces at Ep since 1965 so I have seen a bit of RFC
by Jimbo » 20 Jul 2008 15:13
by SteveRoyal » 20 Jul 2008 15:23
by Ian Royal » 20 Jul 2008 16:35
Jimbo Ian Royal's last two posts are the most well thought out, realistic and non-pessimistic things I have seen on these pages for a long time.
Things could be a little better right now, but they could be a hell of a lot worse. I wish a few other people on here had the intelligence to realise this.
Well done sir.
by Hoop Blah » 21 Jul 2008 14:08
by Arch » 21 Jul 2008 14:49
Hoop Blah This might clear things up a bit, if it's true that is.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A38580997
Sounds about right though...
by Hoop Blah » 21 Jul 2008 15:03
ArchHoop Blah This might clear things up a bit, if it's true that is.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A38580997
Sounds about right though...
Only makes sense if it was quite a while ago. Cambridge would have been mad to take that deal last week.
by Sir Rodney Effing » 21 Jul 2008 16:16
Jimbo Ian Royal's last two posts are the most well thought out, realistic and non-pessimistic things I have seen on these pages for a long time.
Things could be a little better right now, but they could be a hell of a lot worse. I wish a few other people on here had the intelligence to realise this.
Well done sir.
Users browsing this forum: BarryWhiteRFC, MartinRdg, rabidbee and 903 guests