Royal Lady and £2.8 mill was our value for Bikey.
They were robbed, i would take mills over Bikey any day, and i have seen Mills just once.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 20 Aug 2009 11:03
Royal Lady and £2.8 mill was our value for Bikey.
by Hoop Blah » 20 Aug 2009 11:03
CMRoyal In fact, that strengthens your argument because arguably he didn't make the grade. I
by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2009 11:07
by Hoop Blah » 20 Aug 2009 11:10
Royal Lady Except Bikey has been signed by a Premiership team. And Mills hasn't.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 20 Aug 2009 11:16
Royal Lady Except Bikey has been signed by a Premiership team. And Mills hasn't.
by Terminal Boardom » 20 Aug 2009 16:06
by brendywendy » 20 Aug 2009 16:16
Harpers So Solid CrewRoyal Lady and £2.8 mill was our value for Bikey.
They were robbed, i would take mills over Bikey any day, and i have seen Mills just once.
by Big Foot » 20 Aug 2009 18:03
by Arch » 20 Aug 2009 21:12
by Royal Lady » 21 Aug 2009 08:54
by Hoop Blah » 21 Aug 2009 09:07
Royal Lady Uh oh - you'll have the likes of Royalee and Hoop Blah telling you you're stupid in a minute.
by Royal Lady » 21 Aug 2009 09:08
by FiNeRaIn » 21 Aug 2009 09:15
Royal Lady I said almost the exact same thing re Mills and I got slaughtered for it.
by Hoop Blah » 21 Aug 2009 09:20
FiNeRaInRoyal Lady I said almost the exact same thing re Mills and I got slaughtered for it.
A lot of the problem on HNA RL is that people have issues with the poster rather than the post itself. I can't help but feel had it been anyone elses name tag next to your post it would have gone down far better. You are making some good points atm IMO.
by FiNeRaIn » 21 Aug 2009 09:22
Hoop BlahFiNeRaInRoyal Lady I said almost the exact same thing re Mills and I got slaughtered for it.
A lot of the problem on HNA RL is that people have issues with the poster rather than the post itself. I can't help but feel had it been anyone elses name tag next to your post it would have gone down far better. You are making some good points atm IMO.
Not at all, I have no issue whatsoever with RL. She's a bit of a drama queen but that's not unusual!
RL's point was different and then became more a point about him being from Doncaster, not fit and a desperation signing because he wasn't match fit for the first few games of his 3 year contract. That was the bit I had issue with, not her opinion that Mills might've had a bit of a shocker.
by ade_kent_royal » 25 Aug 2009 18:39
by zummerset » 25 Aug 2009 18:40
by Ian Royal » 25 Aug 2009 19:10
by Royal Lady » 26 Aug 2009 12:12
Ian Royal Two fairly obvious reasons spring to mind.
1) Not injured =/= match fit
2) Transfer interest
by Hoop Blah » 26 Aug 2009 12:23
Royal LadyIan Royal Two fairly obvious reasons spring to mind.
1) Not injured =/= match fit
2) Transfer interest
He played yesterday of course. Though Mills, who has been stated as not being match fit, did not. How does that work?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 504 guests