by Royal Lady » 19 Aug 2014 13:28
by MmmMonsterMunch » 19 Aug 2014 13:30
by MmmMonsterMunch » 19 Aug 2014 13:34
by Royal Biscuitman » 19 Aug 2014 14:11
There's always a risk he might have a detrimental effect on the development of the U21's as well.Royal Lady just dumping him to train with U21s isn't going to make him think I must prove myself here and prove the others wrong.
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Aug 2014 14:32
MmmMonsterMunch
As for terminating his contract, if a player doesn't keep to a personal fitness regime as they should & is therefore never match fit, that might not be strong enough grounds to actually dismiss them providing they actually turn up for training.
by Brum Royal » 19 Aug 2014 14:50
by P!ssed Off » 19 Aug 2014 14:52
Brum Royal Anyone (strap?) got a record of how many games he has played for us, and what's the longest (no. of minutes) game he's played?
by Brum Royal » 19 Aug 2014 14:58
by maffff » 19 Aug 2014 14:58
Extended-PhenotypeMmmMonsterMunch
As for terminating his contract, if a player doesn't keep to a personal fitness regime as they should & is therefore never match fit, that might not be strong enough grounds to actually dismiss them providing they actually turn up for training.
It is. If you are not able to play because of personal conditioning, that is breach of contract. You can't sign a 3 year professional contract, go "Ha ha FUK you guys, I'm actually a COMPLETE TOOL!" and then just go down the pub and get smashed every night, eat Burger King every day, put on 10 stone and turn up to training if and when you choose with a hooker on your arm and a reefer in your gob.
by Pepe the Horseman » 19 Aug 2014 15:02
by Extended-Phenotype » 19 Aug 2014 15:03
by strap » 19 Aug 2014 15:50
P!ssed OffBrum Royal Anyone (strap?) got a record of how many games he has played for us, and what's the longest (no. of minutes) game he's played?
http://www.espnfc.com/player/105391/royston-drenthe
Though this doesn't include his debut against Ipswich where he played 79 minutes.
He's played 3 full league games for us.
by Hoop Blah » 19 Aug 2014 16:00
Extended-PhenotypeMmmMonsterMunch
As for terminating his contract, if a player doesn't keep to a personal fitness regime as they should & is therefore never match fit, that might not be strong enough grounds to actually dismiss them providing they actually turn up for training.
It is. If you are not able to play because of personal conditioning, that is breach of contract. You can't sign a 3 year professional contract, go "Ha ha FUK you guys, I'm actually a COMPLETE TOOL!" and then just go down the pub and get smashed every night, eat Burger King every day, put on 10 stone and turn up to training if and when you choose with a hooker on your arm and a reefer in your gob.
by Ian Royal » 19 Aug 2014 16:09
Royal Lady In what possible way would the new owners want to keep Drenthe, manager doesn't want him, he's not playing, he's been banished to train with the under 21s and he costs a fortune. Who in their right mind would take over a club and want to keep a player like that?
And I will still stick up for Drenthe until I have definitive proof that his being banished to the under 21s is nothing more than Adkins childish attempt to try and have some managerial "influence" because he didn't want him or sign him in the first place. IF all these stories were true, including taking coke, which is libellous without any proof whatsoever, by the way, we'd have got rid of him by terminating his contract.
by Royal Biscuitman » 19 Aug 2014 16:15
Ian RoyalRoyal Lady In what possible way would the new owners want to keep Drenthe, manager doesn't want him, he's not playing, he's been banished to train with the under 21s and he costs a fortune. Who in their right mind would take over a club and want to keep a player like that?
And I will still stick up for Drenthe until I have definitive proof that his being banished to the under 21s is nothing more than Adkins childish attempt to try and have some managerial "influence" because he didn't want him or sign him in the first place. IF all these stories were true, including taking coke, which is libellous without any proof whatsoever, by the way, we'd have got rid of him by terminating his contract.
He broke into Everton's training ground to screw some women and they didn't sack him. It's not that clear cut. Especially if its a genuine addiction. Terminating contracts is difficult even outside the dodgy football environment.
by Ian Royal » 19 Aug 2014 16:21
Royal BiscuitmanIan RoyalRoyal Lady In what possible way would the new owners want to keep Drenthe, manager doesn't want him, he's not playing, he's been banished to train with the under 21s and he costs a fortune. Who in their right mind would take over a club and want to keep a player like that?
And I will still stick up for Drenthe until I have definitive proof that his being banished to the under 21s is nothing more than Adkins childish attempt to try and have some managerial "influence" because he didn't want him or sign him in the first place. IF all these stories were true, including taking coke, which is libellous without any proof whatsoever, by the way, we'd have got rid of him by terminating his contract.
He broke into Everton's training ground to screw some women and they didn't sack him. It's not that clear cut. Especially if its a genuine addiction. Terminating contracts is difficult even outside the dodgy football environment.
Why were there women locked inside Everton's training ground?
by Uke » 19 Aug 2014 17:17
MmmMonsterMunchRoyal Lady He's been given nothing to make him work his socks off in training - he could do that every day and Adkins won't play him.
As others have said, either terminate his contract for breach of contract due to all these supposed things he has done, or treat him like any other player and if he proves himself in training, with the first team, then give him a go in the team. If it is the case that the other players refuse to work with him, he must have done something wrong,in which case, sack him.
Sorry what the hell are you talking about RL?! He was presumably given a decent contract at Reading last summer!!!! Or does that constitute nothing? We saved him from the footballing wilderness where he had already been ditched by a no mark Russian club so I’d say that’s a decent incentive to do well no??
He wasn't match fit in August last season & never has been for his entire tenure here. Adkins has put up with his BS for an entire year & now Anton has fcuked off & Nigel has control again he’s probably thought “Do you know what mate, there are 18 year olds here more professional than you are so I’m fcuked if I’m picking you again. Now do one you complete cnut”
Fair play to him. The bloke is a useless waster who should do the honourable thing & get the fcuk out of our club.
Adkins was playing him & giving him chances right up to April – FACT.
He has had MORE than enough time.
Presumably Adkins is legally obliged to give him training facilities etc hence the inclusion with the kids.
by VlakvarkAsh » 19 Aug 2014 20:17
by Royal Biscuitman » 20 Aug 2014 12:55
I'd be tempted to tell Drenthe he doesn't have to come to training and let him sit at home getting fatter and more unfit, in fact I'd tell him he doesn't even have to be in the country.Uke [resumably Adkins is legally obliged to give him training facilities etc hence the inclusion with the kids.
by leon » 20 Aug 2014 14:14
Royal BiscuitmanI'd be tempted to tell Drenthe he doesn't have to come to training and let him sit at home getting fatter and more unfit, in fact I'd tell him he doesn't even have to be in the country.Uke [resumably Adkins is legally obliged to give him training facilities etc hence the inclusion with the kids.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests