by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 18:31
by Royal Lady » 26 Aug 2010 18:41
by Yellowcoat » 26 Aug 2010 18:46
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 18:48
Royal Lady I think the problem lies with the Reading Football Club plc and Reading Football Club "holdings" or whatever they're both called. It would be far easier for us fans if the Football Club had a completely separate set of accounts to those of the hotel etc.
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 26 Aug 2010 18:49
Yellowcoat I am no longer involved with the club in any way but have been company secretary to several businesses, and a charity, and have run a small local council. Unlike Royal Blue I can understand why a bank would call for a reduction in loans and overdraft in the current financial climate. He views everything about RFC from the the stance of personally hating SJM so although he will not admit it that colours his views. I try to understand what is going on and do not think the fans are being lied to. Too many people make assumptions about the income and expenditure which are wrong.
by ROKERITE » 26 Aug 2010 19:33
holsgrove breaks a legROKERITE The biggest mistake Sir John has made is allowing himself to be swayed by a few short-sighted fans. If he'd stuck to his guns and given his full backing to Rodgers, the future for Reading would be a lot brighter.
Rokerite= tommy smith in disguise
Something tells me that you would have even waxed lyrical about the hapless tenure of your own Terry Butcher and Mick Buxton.....
by howser » 26 Aug 2010 20:29
by Alan Partridge » 26 Aug 2010 20:35
by howser » 26 Aug 2010 20:43
by Alan Partridge » 26 Aug 2010 20:49
howser I accept what you say AP, but why cant the management see the need for new blood in the positions that you mention......................everybody else appears to be aware of our problems, can the only reason not be that Madejski isnt interested or that bothered about it.......but we musn't forget that he is determined to get us back in the top league...........my ass.
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Aug 2010 21:02
howser I accept what you say AP, but why cant the management see the need for new blood in the positions that you mention......................everybody else appears to be aware of our problems, can the only reason not be that Madejski isnt interested or that bothered about it.......but we musn't forget that he is determined to get us back in the top league...........my ass.
by howser » 26 Aug 2010 21:08
by loyalroyal4life » 26 Aug 2010 21:46
Alan Partridge Rodgers had Madejski's support it was others around Jm who didn't like Rodgers.
He was an utter disaster. Too inexperienced for a rebuild job and tried to play Rolls Royce football using the engine and parts of a Reliant Robin.
He went his tenure without a recognised right back, signed some utter crap and the results were there for all to see. God knows what would have happened had he been given more time to put his influence on this lot. The shackles were off as soon as he went and bar the odd hiccup here and there the confidence and freedom in the teams play was evident. #
Rodgers *might* do ok at Swansea because it's all there for him. He doesn't have to do anything other than find them a bit of cutting edge from somewhere. He's taken that Sinclair who may work out for them but Swansea can't keep hold of their best players and don't really have the funds to take them onto the next level.
McDermott inherited a mess and he's had the fewest resources given to him since Jim and Mick in 1995.
If you dodn't improve your squad each year you've got serious problems and that's the situation Reading have now. A squad top heavy in central midfielders and goalkeepers and not enough of the important places. Centre half and centre forward. The two areas of the pitch that win you things.
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Aug 2010 22:22
by Northern Git » 26 Aug 2010 23:02
by Terminal Boardom » 27 Aug 2010 08:42
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 27 Aug 2010 09:10
Terminal Boardom Thing is, with no money about, if BMcD was removed, who would want to come in knowing that funds for new players was non-existant? Also, which players would want to come if they knew that there was no visible sign of ambition?
by under the tin » 27 Aug 2010 09:33
Terminal Boardom Thing is, with no money about, if BMcD was removed, who would want to come in knowing that funds for new players was non-existant? Also, which players would want to come if they knew that there was no visible sign of ambition?
by Yellowcoat » 27 Aug 2010 11:51
by SouthDownsRoyal » 27 Aug 2010 23:45
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus and 233 guests