by NewCorkSeth » 06 Sep 2013 16:01
by Ouroboros » 06 Sep 2013 16:14
by Royalclapper » 06 Sep 2013 16:19
by Harrydog » 06 Sep 2013 16:20
Ouroboros Adkins: I do not believe that the players I have bought are any good
by paddy20 » 06 Sep 2013 16:34
MaguireTBM Adkins: 'I don't think Reading can reach 100 goal target with the players we have now'
Discuss
I think he's a total moron for even saying it in the first place. You don't need to score anywhere near 100 goals to get promoted - it's rare that a title-winning team will even get 90.
We won the league with 69. Birmingham have been promoted with 54. I'd say 80 goals would be a tough yet realistic target that also gives you a great chance of getting auto.
Why you'd walk into a new job and start banging on about scoring 100 goals is beyond me.
by paddy20 » 06 Sep 2013 16:35
Ouroboros Adkins: I do not believe that the players I have bought are any good
by paddy20 » 06 Sep 2013 16:48
by Ouroboros » 06 Sep 2013 16:54
HarrydogOuroboros Adkins: I do not believe that the players I have bought are any good
i'm assuming you mean inherited, as you would be a moron to say Drenthe, Williams and Bridge aren't any good !
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2013 17:04
by NewCorkSeth » 06 Sep 2013 17:23
Ian Royal I'm not sure why Adkins saying he thought the targets were realistic and us not being able to close the deals due to finances has to automatically mean he's been screwed on resources.
It could equally mean that we had the resources he thought were necessary to get them, but they wanted more and we couldn't / weren't prepared to go to the necessary level beyond our valuation.
by Avon Royal » 06 Sep 2013 17:51
TBM Adkins: 'I don't think Reading can reach 100 goal target with the players we have now'
Discuss
by NewCorkSeth » 06 Sep 2013 17:55
Avon RoyalTBM Adkins: 'I don't think Reading can reach 100 goal target with the players we have now'
Discuss
But he didn't say that did he?
by pea » 06 Sep 2013 18:02
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2013 18:04
by Avon Royal » 06 Sep 2013 18:12
NewCorkSethAvon RoyalTBM Adkins: 'I don't think Reading can reach 100 goal target with the players we have now'
Discuss
But he didn't say that did he?
He insinuated it and said he had serious doubts about our teams striking ability. He didn't say those exact words in that exact order but TBM took what was clearly visible between the lines and said it for him.
by andrew1957 » 06 Sep 2013 18:15
by tmesis » 06 Sep 2013 18:16
Royalclapper Confrontations a plenty to come by the sounds of it, it appears that Adkins is not prepared to be the usual lackey that the club bullies around.
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2013 18:18
andrew1957 The full transcript in the EP recently posted is very illuminating.
1/ He confirms yet again that he wanted 3 new players.
2/ He implies that Sissoko was not one of his targets - is Anton playing "football manager"? NA does not sound overwhelmingly sorry that this potential deal broke down. Again there is an implication that he would have preferred the money to be spent on a striker. ("CW - We've spoken all summer and the priority has been a striker, then people look at the wages we presume Sissoko is going to be on and think why we can't those wages go on the forward? Can you understand why people are thinking that?
NA - I share the empathy with everybody. But as I've highlighted as the manager of the club it's my responsibility to keep everybody focused and everybody on board.
I share the empathy. I've highlighted what I wanted to do but the reality is this is what we've got.
What we've got to do now is keep working very hard to keep pushing on to what we want to achieve.")
3/ It is implied that one target was as suspected Cameron Jerome but to be fair to the club a player like him would always prefer to stay in the PL.
4/ Selling Mariappa was a business decision (too good an offer to refuse) and he would have preferred to keep the player. ("There was no desire to let him go but obviously a bid came in that the board deemed a good offer business wise and they've gone and accepted it.")
5/ We kept other players that were subject to bids - implied as Alex McCarthy and Adam Le Fondre - but there were probably bids for McCleary and HRK as well. Kebe clearly wanted out but as far as we are aware Mariappa was not pressuring to go so it does beg the question why the club let Mariappa go and yet retained others. It might imply that perhaps the owner did not rate Mariappa??
Again it is refreshing how open NA has been.
by Nameless » 06 Sep 2013 18:19
andrew1957 Tas we are aware Mariappa was not pressuring to go so it does beg the question why the club let Mariappa go and yet retained others. It might imply that perhaps the owner did not rate Mariappa??
by Scutterbucketz » 06 Sep 2013 18:25
Pepe the HorsemanI don’t think we haven’t got enough goals in the team to reach that target
Wait. So he does think we can do it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 283 guests