by Libertine » 11 Mar 2016 22:01
by Dick Habbin's hairdo » 11 Mar 2016 22:02
by Royal Ginger » 11 Mar 2016 22:07
by Rax » 11 Mar 2016 22:09
by Royal Ginger » 11 Mar 2016 22:11
by lolwut » 11 Mar 2016 22:12
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2016 22:13
by genome » 11 Mar 2016 22:21
by Rax » 11 Mar 2016 22:28
Extended-Phenotype Prior to the pen, we were growing into the stronger team and looking good.
Pen was a shocker, total dive, never would have been given that ourselves. Bullshit commentators, ''oh, he made contact by brushing him gently with his hand'' fcuk off. Awful refereeing decision and you could see him and his crew dying to give the bigger club their chance that they couldn't carve out without cheating.
What a shit way to be knocked out.
by ManchesterRoyals » 11 Mar 2016 22:31
by genome » 11 Mar 2016 22:32
by glass half full » 11 Mar 2016 22:35
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Mar 2016 22:35
by Rax » 11 Mar 2016 22:40
Extended-Phenotype Imagine. Ola John bursts into the Palace box and their defender delicately strokes him with a camp brush of the hand. John falls over... I guarantee it would be a booking for a dive.
Absolute joke, fcuk anyone who remotely believes Palace deserved the win. How? They couldn't score. They could only score on a bad decision by cheating. So no, they didn't deserve it on any level. What a flid thing to even argue when the facts i.e. lack of any goals without cheating, proves that no, they didn't deserve to win as they couldn't score any goals.
by Royal Ginger » 11 Mar 2016 23:04
by UTDSTEVE » 11 Mar 2016 23:26
Extended-Phenotype Imagine. Ola John bursts into the Palace box and their defender delicately strokes him with a camp brush of the hand. John falls over... I guarantee it would be a booking for a dive.
Absolute joke, fcuk anyone who remotely believes Palace deserved the win. How? They couldn't score. They could only score on a bad decision by cheating. So no, they didn't deserve it on any level. What a flid thing to even argue when the facts i.e. lack of any goals without cheating, proves that no, they didn't deserve to win as they couldn't score any goals.
by sandman » 11 Mar 2016 23:33
UTDSTEVE :D you absolute dick!!Extended-Phenotype Imagine. Ola John bursts into the Palace box and their defender delicately strokes him with a camp brush of the hand. John falls over... I guarantee it would be a booking for a dive.
Absolute joke, fcuk anyone who remotely believes Palace deserved the win. How? They couldn't score. They could only score on a bad decision by cheating. So no, they didn't deserve it on any level. What a flid thing to even argue when the facts i.e. lack of any goals without cheating, proves that no, they didn't deserve to win as they couldn't score any goals.
by Tails » 11 Mar 2016 23:40
by P!ssed Off » 11 Mar 2016 23:48
by leon » 11 Mar 2016 23:57
Tails We rode our luck at times, and at times it was clear which team were the higher division - but this doesn't mean that they deserved to win. Its about converting your chances, Palace had theirs handed to them on a plate, gifted wrapped, courtesy of Dean. Objectively, Palace had their fair share of luck too (excluding the penalty), more composure by John in the first half and a better directed header and it *could* have been 2-0 Reading. Ifs, buts and maybes, sure.
Its a bit galling, though not unsurprising.