bobby1413Snowflake Royal Gunter does exactly what he has to do to take the least responsibility with the least chance of catastrophic failure for him on the pitch. That's not what we need.
Compare to Blackett, who makes more catastrophic errors in possession, but at least he tries to make things happen and be positive. And that's reflected in his better passing and crossing stats. You won't see any fans creaming themselves over him the way they do Gunter though. And he's been at (partial) fault for fewer goals this season than Gunter too.
Don't really get this. Some of the best players are those that just do the simple things, and not try to take risks, be a one man hero, or do things they know they can't do.
Blackett's got many issues, not just the fact he often looks confused, lost, out of depth and asleep. You say "at least he tries to make things happen and be positive". Not sure that's working for him in anyway.
I'd say - at least Gunter does what he feels he can do and that is to pass to another player which is a straight forward pass, nothing spectacular, and just gets on.
I'd rather that than players trying to run with the ball and make glory passes, only to continually lose it.
I appreciate the effort to read what I said and engage in a conversation, even though we disagree. Thanks.
I'd argue that there is a difference between playing simple balls and within your ability and avoiding risk. It's like talking about risk management and saying you should be risk averse. No. Risk averse is not good. Risks are necessary, but the right risks, with the right risk vs reward value.
Take McShane for example (or Pearce from a few years ago). Not the best passer of our centrebacks by any stretch of the imagination. They tried to keep things simple and play within their ability for passing. That doesn't mean negativity or being overly cautious though. McShane still plays positive passes. He played a couple of delightful balls into attack early on against Norwich. I've seen him play balls to feet into our attackers through relatively small gaps as well. When he sees a positive pass worth doing, he makes it. I just don't see that from Gunter... it's like he plays on a shit auto pilot safety mode.
I consider this to be shown in most aspects of his game, not just short passing. His crossing - rarely does he try to pick out someone specific, it's always just an area and hoping someone went there. Or getting into a position and deciding he should cross without having engineered the space, so he just plays it straight against the defender. Or in the way he defends. You'll often see him backing off from a winger whilst 3 / 4 / 5 yards away. He needs to be getting close enough that he makes crossing difficult and can react to a poor touch - about arms length, maybe two arms length at most.
The point I'm trying to make is that I think Gunter avoids taking the responsibility of doing anything positive because it has a greater risk of going wrong. It's like he does his risk analysis, but fails to do any of the reward consideration.