by tmesis » 26 Mar 2020 21:05
by Millsy » 27 Mar 2020 09:48
STAR Liaison2 world wars, 1 world cup Blimey.
Did you wear shinpads?
Only in the office.
by SCIAG » 27 Mar 2020 14:13
STAR Liaison2 world wars, 1 world cupSTAR Liaison
This is an internet myth as far as we know. There is no contemporary evidence of a foundation date or meeting. Extremely unlikely it would have been before Nov 1871.
Not before November? It definitely can't be Xmas Day then.
Eh? There was interest in setting up football clubs locally in Nov / Dec 1871 - because the FA Cup had just started with Marlow and Maidenhead competing. Henley were formed about this time. It's theoretically possible that Reading could have been formed on 25 Dec 1871 but there's no evidence to support this and it seems very unlikely that a religious holiday would have been interrupted to do this.
by STAR Liaison » 27 Mar 2020 14:46
SCIAGSTAR Liaison2 world wars, 1 world cup
Not before November? It definitely can't be Xmas Day then.
Eh? There was interest in setting up football clubs locally in Nov / Dec 1871 - because the FA Cup had just started with Marlow and Maidenhead competing. Henley were formed about this time. It's theoretically possible that Reading could have been formed on 25 Dec 1871 but there's no evidence to support this and it seems very unlikely that a religious holiday would have been interrupted to do this.
I was under the impression that we (along with Notts County) had entered every edition of the FA Cup. As Notts County won the FA Cup in 1894, this made us the least successful side in the competition’s history. Just looked it up and you’re right, this is not true. Maidenhead and Marlow have both entered every competition bar one, so are the most successful sides. Is this a warped version of a true fact or just a complete fabrication? Are we perhaps the team with the most consecutive entries but no victories?
by Sutekh » 27 Mar 2020 14:59
STAR LiaisonSCIAGSTAR Liaison
Eh? There was interest in setting up football clubs locally in Nov / Dec 1871 - because the FA Cup had just started with Marlow and Maidenhead competing. Henley were formed about this time. It's theoretically possible that Reading could have been formed on 25 Dec 1871 but there's no evidence to support this and it seems very unlikely that a religious holiday would have been interrupted to do this.
I was under the impression that we (along with Notts County) had entered every edition of the FA Cup. As Notts County won the FA Cup in 1894, this made us the least successful side in the competition’s history. Just looked it up and you’re right, this is not true. Maidenhead and Marlow have both entered every competition bar one, so are the most successful sides. Is this a warped version of a true fact or just a complete fabrication? Are we perhaps the team with the most consecutive entries but no victories?
With Notts demise to NL the situation has changed. Almost need to be a lawyer to write this this!
Of the current league clubs Reading has most consecutive entries into the FA Cup - every year since 1877 (the same year Notts first entered). We will hold that 'record' until Notts get back in the league when we'll have to revert to having most unsuccessful entries because, as you say, they won it in 1894 and we'll hold that record until we win the damn thing! Or something worse happens.
by AthleticoSpizz » 28 Mar 2020 22:50
home on leave, twas at them both....the gallstone ground wasn’t it?tmesis We played games on consecutive days as recently as 1986, playing Boxing Day and the day after. I think we drew both, 2-2 v Birmingham at Elm Park on Boxing Day, and 1-1 at Brighton the day after.
by Snowflake Royal » 29 Mar 2020 08:59
by Zip » 29 Mar 2020 11:51
by Fox Talbot » 30 Mar 2020 10:52
by CountryRoyal » 01 Apr 2020 12:31
Fox Talbot How the season is resolved - whether, like non-league, they expunge the results and press re-start or instead call the season over with the league tables as they stand - is really interesting and fortunately Reading have no beef either way.
by tmesis » 02 Apr 2020 18:53
by Sutekh » 03 Apr 2020 11:35
by The Royal Forester » 03 Apr 2020 12:37
Sutekh https://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-fc-defenders-season-ends-18031131
Seems the Belgian FA have taken the decision to end their season as things currently stand. This should pass ratification by full committee there later this month.
Not sure what ramifications are for the rest of Europe as apparently there was only 1 actual league game left but to be honest I wouldn’t be surprised to see the PL and FL eventually follow suit with, presumably, a ppg ratio applied to pick up the gaps where clubs hadn’t played the same number of games. However the European authorities are urging domestic bodies not to abandon their league competitions.
Of course if the season did resume, Reading would presumably have Tom Holmes available after his loan over there.
For the record, as per the link below, it is expected that the PL (and probably the FL) will announce a further delay to any possible resumption - so, quite rightly, they’re going to give it as much time as possible before finalising their decision.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52140204
by BraisingsteakRoyal » 03 Apr 2020 13:43
CountryRoyal Alternatively depending on the time frame of coronavirus would be to indefinitely delay the season with the aim of resuming it around the November time or so and not having a 2020/2021 season at all. Wouldn't happen but would be fairer.
by Jagermesiter1871 » 04 Apr 2020 00:04
by windermereROYAL » 04 Apr 2020 07:11
Jagermesiter1871 Am I the only one who think's there's a good chance things won't resume at all this year and possibly even next year?
In what circumstances will people be able to meet in 10's of thousands? Surely this will only be once the virus is eradicated or we have a vaccine, which is very unlikely to be any earlier than mid 2021 and that's with things going well. Perhaps games behind closed doors but even then that's putting players and staff at risk.
by tmesis » 04 Apr 2020 11:46
windermereROYAL It will be a hell of a party when we get going again for sure, but thats still some way off.
by windermereROYAL » 04 Apr 2020 13:05
tmesiswindermereROYAL It will be a hell of a party when we get going again for sure, but thats still some way off.
If it lasts a year or more, how many businesses in the entertainment/leisure industry will still exist after a year of no income?
In two months time people will have had enough, and the only things that will stop people going out are martial law or astronomical death rates, leaving them too scared to go out.
by tmesis » 04 Apr 2020 13:19
windermereROYALtmesiswindermereROYAL It will be a hell of a party when we get going again for sure, but thats still some way off.
If it lasts a year or more, how many businesses in the entertainment/leisure industry will still exist after a year of no income?
In two months time people will have had enough, and the only things that will stop people going out are martial law or astronomical death rates, leaving them too scared to go out.
Go out to where is the main question?
by Jagermesiter1871 » 04 Apr 2020 14:54
tmesiswindermereROYALtmesis If it lasts a year or more, how many businesses in the entertainment/leisure industry will still exist after a year of no income?
In two months time people will have had enough, and the only things that will stop people going out are martial law or astronomical death rates, leaving them too scared to go out.
Go out to where is the main question?
Anywhere...outdoors, go round to see friends, family. Basically where the irresponsible few are still going and spreading the virus currently.
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot] and 230 guests