RoyalBluewindermereROYAL For the handball the ref could not have been closer, he indicated the defender had his arms down by his side, correct decision in my view.
You've seen the picture on the OS? His arm is clearly not flat against his side. Therefore he has, under the current guidance, made his body 'unnaturally bigger' and IMO it should've been a penalty. That interpretation is why you see so many defenders unnaturally positioned with their hands behind their bodies!
The photo is taken as (or briefly after) contact - the ball has come off his hip and speed and knocked his arm making it look unnatural - his arm was in a natural position as Puscas shot only the force of the contact shifts the arm. No penalty and shows why a still photograph should not be used as proof of anything in football when everything in frame is actually moving.