by Jackson Corner » 27 Feb 2007 23:32
by Horsham Royal » 27 Feb 2007 23:33
Don Finchcatzbod seol and hopfully oster.
Amen, can't believe people on here waxing lyrical about Oster - you must be having a laugh, he gave the ball away evrytime he got it. I sometimes wonder if I've been watching the same game as others when I read some reports on here. He was shoite at OT, even worse tonight.
Great comeback, all credit to the players on the park, you always get the feeling we are capapble of doing such a come back. If Boris' shot woul have gone in there woul have been no wrok for me tomorrow as my head would have fallen off. Fair play reading, we made a game of it.
by Don Finch » 27 Feb 2007 23:36
Stranded Anyone who thought Oster was shit is blind.
by Alan Partridge » 27 Feb 2007 23:37
by Don Finch » 27 Feb 2007 23:39
by Don Finch » 27 Feb 2007 23:40
Horsham Royal I'm not sure, but didn't Oster set up Gunnar for the crossbar shot ?
by Archie's penalty » 27 Feb 2007 23:42
Don FinchHorsham Royal I'm not sure, but didn't Oster set up Gunnar for the crossbar shot ?
And? Oh, I'm sorry, that means he was 10/10. My bad.
by Woodcote Royal » 27 Feb 2007 23:44
by wehateoxford » 27 Feb 2007 23:49
Stranded Right,
Anyone who thought Oster was shit is blind.
Bikey looked lost when it was 532 as did the rest of the team. Once we changed to 442 he was immense and hardly put a foot wrong. When he won the ball he was always looking for the right pass and found it more often than not. For 80mins he was superb and should be signed now. The bloke is 22 and will only get better.
Compared to Sonko at the same time in his Reading career - Bikey is a million miles better.
Little should have been on earlier.
For me, if Kusczak (sp?) played we'd be sat here now celebrating a win.
by Don Finch » 27 Feb 2007 23:50
Archie's penalty Oster did loads
by Maguire » 27 Feb 2007 23:50
Don FinchArchie's penalty Oster did loads
I am extremely blinkered, I don't like the man and don't think he adds anything to the team. Some of his passing was Sunday league at best, he gave the ball away so much it began to give me some sort of aneurysm.
by rg6royal » 27 Feb 2007 23:52
by shadesrwrf » 27 Feb 2007 23:54
by Horsham Royal » 27 Feb 2007 23:54
Didn't say he was 10/10 - but for 50 minutes or so, he was just about the only creative player we had on the pitch.Don FinchHorsham Royal I'm not sure, but didn't Oster set up Gunnar for the crossbar shot ?
And? Oh, I'm sorry, that means he was 10/10. My bad.
by Alan Partridge » 27 Feb 2007 23:55
Woodcote Royal In as much as I took one look at the MAN U starting line-up and felt we had to go for it before Fergie called on his subs, yes, I think Copps was wrong not to start 4-4-2.
And, the irony was that the extra defender only succeeded in producing our worst rearguard performance of the season
Bikey grew in stature as the night went on and, as a 22 year old part time defender up against the biggest club in the world, I think he deserves a lot more slack than he's being given here.
Not long ago, I thought we wouldn't spend more than £500k to sign him permanently but I think tonight added a few hundred grand to that figure.
I really hope he's still here next season along with Oster, Gunnarsson and Dela Cruz, who all impressed me greatly tonight.
What made Sidwell any better than Gunnarsson and which one would you choose to score a goal to save your life?...................it would be the ice man for me, no contest!
MAN Utd hangimg for grim death against Reading reserves........................fcuking eat that, Holt, you w@nker
by Don Finch » 27 Feb 2007 23:59
by leon » 28 Feb 2007 00:04
Alan PartridgeWoodcote Royal In as much as I took one look at the MAN U starting line-up and felt we had to go for it before Fergie called on his subs, yes, I think Copps was wrong not to start 4-4-2.
And, the irony was that the extra defender only succeeded in producing our worst rearguard performance of the season
Bikey grew in stature as the night went on and, as a 22 year old part time defender up against the biggest club in the world, I think he deserves a lot more slack than he's being given here.
Not long ago, I thought we wouldn't spend more than £500k to sign him permanently but I think tonight added a few hundred grand to that figure.
I really hope he's still here next season along with Oster, Gunnarsson and Dela Cruz, who all impressed me greatly tonight.
What made Sidwell any better than Gunnarsson and which one would you choose to score a goal to save your life?...................it would be the ice man for me, no contest!
MAN Utd hangimg for grim death against Reading reserves........................fcuking eat that, Holt, you w@nker
Sidwell and Gunnarsson were equally brilliant, problem is Woodcote if you didn't notice a) he was absolutely fcuked by the end and couldn't play every week, b) he's 31/32.
Agree on Bikey, the lad will be class.
by Horsham Royal » 28 Feb 2007 00:08
Taking on opposition, some decent crosses. Agreed, Little did more once on - that's why I said for 45 mins. Bring on the Arse.Don Finch I don't want to have a go - but what creativity did Oster provide exactly?
by Woodcote Royal » 28 Feb 2007 00:08
Alan Partridge Sidwell and Gunnarsson were equally brilliant, problem is Woodcote if you didn't notice a) he was absolutely fcuked by the end and couldn't play every week, b) he's 31/32.
by When Hicks went up... » 28 Feb 2007 00:08
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 109 guests