by Friday's Child » 04 Oct 2008 12:06
by Gus the teenage cow » 04 Oct 2008 12:08
rg6royalGus the teenage cowrg6royal What I'm trying to say is that I think it's wrong that a player like Jem has come in and put in a good shift and could possibly be dropped in the near future just because a higher profile player is waiting to come back in.
well football isn't dictated by some kind of moral code or moral obligation, it's dog eat canine out there and the better player should be selected
I know but I'm just expressing my view that I don't think it's fair on the other players.
by Handsome Man » 04 Oct 2008 13:41
Royal Lady As much as I think Jem is a good, I do think Marek is the better option at the moment. A game can turn on him - his vision is brilliant.
by From Despair To Where? » 04 Oct 2008 14:04
by superroyaldude » 04 Oct 2008 18:29
by howser » 05 Oct 2008 13:51
by OLLIE KEARNS » 05 Oct 2008 14:08
superroyaldude Marek would cause aboslute havock in this league and the strength of Reading will just be reinforced. However him coming back does come at a price and sadly i think Jem will be the one who will pay, not because he is bad its just because Jem and Marek are 2 very similar players and Gunnar is that strong force that sits back. Yes Jem is a brilliant player but Marek is a much better, more experienced player. Shame he doesnt get passed the ball that often when he is playing.
by Archie's penalty » 05 Oct 2008 14:15
OLLIE KEARNSsuperroyaldude Marek would cause aboslute havock in this league and the strength of Reading will just be reinforced. However him coming back does come at a price and sadly i think Jem will be the one who will pay, not because he is bad its just because Jem and Marek are 2 very similar players and Gunnar is that strong force that sits back. Yes Jem is a brilliant player but Marek is a much better, more experienced player. Shame he doesnt get passed the ball that often when he is playing.
Jem is more like Gunnar in my view. They do everything well without being exceptional at any one part of the game. Marek will be very valuable in games such as yesterday. Burnley played 5 in midfield and made our wingers come inside when we had posession. That in turn meant we had to pick tight passes in central areas. Step forward Marek for one who excels at that as many sides will play that way against us at the Mad Stad.However, other options may be better away from home on a cold night up North.
The good news is we have strength in depth in just about every position which is crucial in a 46 game league. Happy days !
by Forbury Lion » 05 Oct 2008 15:41
by Dirk Gently » 05 Oct 2008 16:04
by Man Friday » 05 Oct 2008 16:37
by chandog » 05 Oct 2008 16:45
Man Friday ...or Harper...or Murty...?
by Dirk Gently » 05 Oct 2008 16:54
by Man Friday » 05 Oct 2008 17:00
by Kevin Doyles Right Foot » 05 Oct 2008 17:17
by Franchise FC » 05 Oct 2008 17:19
Kevin Doyles Right Foot If its broke, don't fix it. simple. Keep jem and gunnar in there
by loyalroyal4life » 05 Oct 2008 17:46
by Ian Royal » 05 Oct 2008 18:20
by Franchise FC » 05 Oct 2008 20:16
Ian Royal I'm hoping Jem can learn a lot from Gunnar during their time together in the first team. Gunnar doesn't have a lot of time left for us and if Jem can learn fromhim I think he could forge a very nice partnership with Harper or Marek. Or both in a 3 man midfield.
In fact I'm salivating at the prospect of Harper, Marek and Karacan.
by Ian Royal » 05 Oct 2008 21:51
Franchise FCIan Royal I'm hoping Jem can learn a lot from Gunnar during their time together in the first team. Gunnar doesn't have a lot of time left for us and if Jem can learn fromhim I think he could forge a very nice partnership with Harper or Marek. Or both in a 3 man midfield.
In fact I'm salivating at the prospect of Harper, Marek and Karacan.
Really ?
Who gets left out ? SHunt, NHunt, Kebe or Doyle - or are we going with only three at the back ?
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot] and 297 guests