by Eaststandman » 13 Mar 2013 15:09
by Libertine » 13 Mar 2013 15:12
winchester_royalLibertine See, and I would have no issue if the board negotiated with another manager behind the now sacked manager's back. It would show having some kind of plan. I much prefer at least having a plan to complete capriciousness...
I'd have massive issue with us treating him like that, but each to their own I guess.
They will have discussed possible options before pulling the trigger, and will know what they want to do next. Just because they haven't appointed someone within 24 hours it doesn't mean there was no serious consideration that went into the decision.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 13 Mar 2013 15:13
winchester_royalLibertine See, and I would have no issue if the board negotiated with another manager behind the now sacked manager's back. It would show having some kind of plan. I much prefer at least having a plan to complete capriciousness...
I'd have massive issue with us treating him like that, but each to their own I guess.
They will have discussed possible options before pulling the trigger, and will know what they want to do next. Just because they haven't appointed someone within 24 hours it doesn't mean there was no serious consideration that went into the decision.
by winchester_royal » 13 Mar 2013 15:17
Libertinewinchester_royalLibertine See, and I would have no issue if the board negotiated with another manager behind the now sacked manager's back. It would show having some kind of plan. I much prefer at least having a plan to complete capriciousness...
I'd have massive issue with us treating him like that, but each to their own I guess.
They will have discussed possible options before pulling the trigger, and will know what they want to do next. Just because they haven't appointed someone within 24 hours it doesn't mean there was no serious consideration that went into the decision.
Well the business world is a pretty ruthless world and sometimes things happen which most of us find personally distasteful. But most successful businesses have a "business plan" and don't make changes for the sake of change and make changes with a long term goal in place and mind. What Soton did to Adkins was harsh but it showed that they put some thought into it and had a vision for the future. I can appreciate that at least...
by Libertine » 13 Mar 2013 15:36
winchester_royal I would argue that there is a long term goal in place, and it was decided that this goal was unobtainable with Brian in charge. You don't know how much thought/time went into making this decision, none of us do. Very few replacement managers are named within 48 hours so chill out.
by winchester_royal » 13 Mar 2013 15:41
Libertinewinchester_royal I would argue that there is a long term goal in place, and it was decided that this goal was unobtainable with Brian in charge. You don't know how much thought/time went into making this decision, none of us do. Very few replacement managers are named within 48 hours so chill out.
Actually I am hoping a decision within 48 hours isn't made at this point. That was the point of my original post. We made a knee jerk reaction in firing Brian, just getting someone in for the sake of getting someone in will only compound that problem. At this point take our time, seeing we had no one lined up when we sacked our manager, do a proper search and get a manager in who can implement a plan going forward for this club.
by Arch » 13 Mar 2013 15:47
winchester_royalLibertinewinchester_royal I would argue that there is a long term goal in place, and it was decided that this goal was unobtainable with Brian in charge. You don't know how much thought/time went into making this decision, none of us do. Very few replacement managers are named within 48 hours so chill out.
Actually I am hoping a decision within 48 hours isn't made at this point. That was the point of my original post. We made a knee jerk reaction in firing Brian, just getting someone in for the sake of getting someone in will only compound that problem. At this point take our time, seeing we had no one lined up when we sacked our manager, do a proper search and get a manager in who can implement a plan going forward for this club.
How do you know it was knee jerk? How do you know it wasn't close in December and Brian was only saved by a few lucky comebacks in January?
by Eaststandman » 13 Mar 2013 15:49
winchester_royalLibertinewinchester_royal I would argue that there is a long term goal in place, and it was decided that this goal was unobtainable with Brian in charge. You don't know how much thought/time went into making this decision, none of us do. Very few replacement managers are named within 48 hours so chill out.
Actually I am hoping a decision within 48 hours isn't made at this point. That was the point of my original post. We made a knee jerk reaction in firing Brian, just getting someone in for the sake of getting someone in will only compound that problem. At this point take our time, seeing we had no one lined up when we sacked our manager, do a proper search and get a manager in who can implement a plan going forward for this club.
How do you know it was knee jerk? How do you know it wasn't close in December and Brian was only saved by a few lucky comebacks in January?
by winchester_royal » 13 Mar 2013 15:53
Eaststandmanwinchester_royal How do you know it was knee jerk? How do you know it wasn't close in December and Brian was only saved by a few lucky comebacks in January?
Thats the point surely, we don't know, but the bloody football club should and therefore not look rudderless?
by paultheroyal » 13 Mar 2013 15:53
by Ouroboros » 13 Mar 2013 16:02
paultheroyal In some respects it would be a disgrace if team put on a performance on Saturday unless Dolan plays new tactics.
by Eaststandman » 13 Mar 2013 16:03
winchester_royalEaststandmanwinchester_royal How do you know it was knee jerk? How do you know it wasn't close in December and Brian was only saved by a few lucky comebacks in January?
Thats the point surely, we don't know, but the bloody football club should and therefore not look rudderless?
What more do you expect a day after sacking a manager?
by Arch » 13 Mar 2013 16:04
by ZacNaloen » 13 Mar 2013 16:08
Arch I think you could have had a reasonable expectation of a spirited performance on Saturday whether Brian was at the helm or not.
by Sanguine » 13 Mar 2013 16:15
by Ouroboros » 13 Mar 2013 16:15
Arch I think you could have had a reasonable expectation of a spirited performance on Saturday whether Brian was at the helm or not.
by P!ssed Off » 13 Mar 2013 16:22
by MmmMonsterMunch » 13 Mar 2013 16:26
P!ssed Off People might say it's "a shambles", "we're playing Man Utd in a few days", "we should have had a manager ready"
Has anyone considered the fact that the next two games, Man Utd away and Arsenal away are unwinnable?
Tbh it is virtually irrelevant who takes charge of these two games, whether it is the Academy manager, the kit man or the average fan.
The next winnable game is Southampton at home on Sat 6th April; from McDermott's sacking this is almost 1 month. Ideally the new manager should have 2 weeks minimum to train with the squad and decide on team selection/tactics.
This gives the Reading Board up to 2 weeks to find and sign a new boss, there really is no rush and we do not need to panic that a new boss was not ready to come in.
If anything a caretaker boss for the next two games may be a positive. A period of transition will allow the fans and players angry about McDermott's sacking time to cool off, so that they will be able to get behind the new boss when he comes in.
Looking at the fixture list, if we were to get rid of McDermott between now and the end of the season, then right now would've been the time to do it. The board's timing has been spot on, imo. Of the last 7 games, 5 are realistically winnable. All is not lost.
by ZacNaloen » 13 Mar 2013 16:30
by MmmMonsterMunch » 13 Mar 2013 16:32
ZacNaloen Eamon is a decent coach, just look at the quality and results the academy is getting at the moment.
I'd rather he stayed doing that though, for the rest of the season...
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 260 guests