Ian Royal surprised you let aquifer in seeing as it's subterranean.
Namelessmelonheadmadstadblues Depending on your point of view, viaduct or aqueduct may be of interest.
They are things that carry water, or go over water. Not bodies of water. Jeez.
Viaducts carry roads, aqueducts carry water. Neither definitively carry things over water.
Ian Royal McCleary and HRK have decent scoring records and could step up. But yes, we look light on goals. And that's one area the Academy doesn't look ready to help with for a little while. Could be big big seasons for Taylor, Tanner and Blackman.
JIM Latest up date .in GET READING not very promising
Elmer Park Apologies if these questions have been answered already somewhere on this thread but can anyone let me know the answers please ?
1. At one time I understood Begbies Traynor were dealing with the sale of the club and a very quick sale was necessary but since Samrit appeared I've not heard mention of them and SJM seems to have taken over control of the sale. Are Begbies still involved ? If not, why not ?
2. One of the reasons a sale was so urgent was that the club couldn't pay it's bills. Who's paying those bills and the salaries now ?
3. Have Vibrac been paid off yet ? If so by who ?
Nameless I'm confused. We've lost 5 players from last season, and we certainly had a squad of more than 25 last season. So how can anyone do the maths to claim we have a squad of just 13 !
It kind of makes you look silly.....
melonhead wouldn't matter if its on the moon, its still a body of water
Nameless There was mention of a £5 million bond being paid a few weeks ago as part of the deal, presumably this is funding the short term running costs. Whether it is non returnable or not I have no idea.
I'd assume the Vibrac situation has been renegotiated, pending completion of the takeover. The sale involved the new owners paying off debts and as they haven't taken over then the debt won't have been paid. No doubt interest will still be being paid and there will be a limit to how long payment can be deferred for.
No idea about Begbies, but if they aren't that would be becasue SJM no longer sees them as being needed and he may be correct in the short term. No point paying them presumably criminally high fees if there is nothing for themto do.
Elmer Park
I would have thought a bond would have to be repaid in the event of the collapse of the deal and together with the increasing interest adding to the Vibrac debt that would make the club even less interesting to other reputable buyers.
.
NamelessElmer Park
I would have thought a bond would have to be repaid in the event of the collapse of the deal and together with the increasing interest adding to the Vibrac debt that would make the club even less interesting to other reputable buyers.
.
Depends entirely on the terms of the deal. Perhaps Begbys told Samrit that he could buy 'first refusal' for a £5 million non refundable deposit. Gives him a real incentive to complete the deal. If it was refundable you would suspect he might have pulled the plug by now and asked for him money back.
I'd assume that the deal is still more likely to happen than not , if SJM really thought it was in danger he'd be back talking to other interested parties and certainly Samuelson would be agitating for talks to reopen with his people.
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie, Four Of Clubs, Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 192 guests
