by MmmMonsterMunch » 16 Jul 2014 18:55
by Royal Ginger » 16 Jul 2014 18:56
by CholseyRoyal » 16 Jul 2014 19:04
Royal Ginger Wonga loan anyone?
by Struggle Pig » 16 Jul 2014 19:30
P!ssed OffStruggle Pig There are various people on here and on other social media outlets that keep saying that the Thai's, SJM, cutting the transfer budget or even selling a player should be done just to get this deal done.
Why are some people so inherently stupid. Why should anyone, bend over, spread cheeks and except this fisting from Virbac.
You wouldn't go into a shop pick up an item knowing what it will cost you say £10 and when you go to the till they say actually Sir/Madam you will need to pay £13 pound. You wouldn't, pay it, you would put it down tell them to stick it and then buy it elsewhere. Rightly so.
Vibrac are disgusting and I hope something gets sorted and this takeover does go through quickly, but if you are one of the stupid one's please don't post just pay it. If it's that simple, you just pay it.
I think the proportionate analogy would be an item tagged at £25, being charged at the till as £25.50.
If I really wanted said item, I would likely pay the extra 50p.
by P!ssed Off » 16 Jul 2014 19:44
by Norfolk Royal » 16 Jul 2014 19:48
Struggle PigP!ssed OffStruggle Pig There are various people on here and on other social media outlets that keep saying that the Thai's, SJM, cutting the transfer budget or even selling a player should be done just to get this deal done.
Why are some people so inherently stupid. Why should anyone, bend over, spread cheeks and except this fisting from Virbac.
You wouldn't go into a shop pick up an item knowing what it will cost you say £10 and when you go to the till they say actually Sir/Madam you will need to pay £13 pound. You wouldn't, pay it, you would put it down tell them to stick it and then buy it elsewhere. Rightly so.
Vibrac are disgusting and I hope something gets sorted and this takeover does go through quickly, but if you are one of the stupid one's please don't post just pay it. If it's that simple, you just pay it.
I think the proportionate analogy would be an item tagged at £25, being charged at the till as £25.50.
If I really wanted said item, I would likely pay the extra 50p.
You're correct with your proportionality, I was just exaggerating slightly and hoping no one would be particularly fussy.
But I stand by my point. If I alter it slightly and you were buying a house for £500,000 and on the day of exchanging contracts the seller said you had to pay an extra £10,000, would you still buy it? I know I would be like "What the fudge! Screw your house"
Adding an extra 2% on top of the sale of anything right at the end is ridiculous.
by fruits » 16 Jul 2014 20:01
by Royal Rother » 16 Jul 2014 20:03
by Struggle Pig » 16 Jul 2014 20:03
Norfolk RoyalStruggle Pig You're correct with your proportionality, I was just exaggerating slightly and hoping no one would be particularly fussy.
But I stand by my point. If I alter it slightly and you were buying a house for £500,000 and on the day of exchanging contracts the seller said you had to pay an extra £10,000, would you still buy it? I know I would be like "What the fudge! Screw your house"
Adding an extra 2% on top of the sale of anything right at the end is ridiculous.
That's close too it but still not really there. If at the end of a business deal there's a sudden add-on and you get the impression you've been lead along the garden path then shafted, you tend to get the hump. It's a human reaction and one which can be a deal breaker. One would hope that some type of expediency would prevail in this case.
by Ian Royal » 16 Jul 2014 20:29
RoyalBlueIan Royalfloyd__streete John Madejski, come out and explain this monumental series of f*ck ups you have caused us
His only cock up was selling to Anton.
![]()
He wasn't very actively involved in the day to day running of the club post that sale?
by TBM » 16 Jul 2014 20:32
by Ian Royal » 16 Jul 2014 20:39
P!ssed OffStruggle Pig There are various people on here and on other social media outlets that keep saying that the Thai's, SJM, cutting the transfer budget or even selling a player should be done just to get this deal done.
Why are some people so inherently stupid. Why should anyone, bend over, spread cheeks and except this fisting from Virbac.
You wouldn't go into a shop pick up an item knowing what it will cost you say £10 and when you go to the till they say actually Sir/Madam you will need to pay £13 pound. You wouldn't, pay it, you would put it down tell them to stick it and then buy it elsewhere. Rightly so.
Vibrac are disgusting and I hope something gets sorted and this takeover does go through quickly, but if you are one of the stupid one's please don't post just pay it. If it's that simple, you just pay it.
I think the proportionate analogy would be an item tagged at £25, being charged at the till as £25.50.
If I really wanted said item, I would likely pay the extra 50p.
by sandman » 16 Jul 2014 21:09
@sonkimarsson Everyone calm down. Samrit "liked" the Reading FC - Official page yesterday, so despite the silence, you have to feel he's still in for us. Unless something drastic has happened in the last 24 hours of course.
Basically can people please have some oxfording patience.
by SydenhamRoyal » 16 Jul 2014 21:55
JakeTheRoyalZacNaloen Anyone got a spare 500k?
Lets have a whip round or alternatively ship out Nick Blackman
by SydenhamRoyal » 16 Jul 2014 21:58
Schards#2 FFS, just get the deal done, have a transfer budget of £9.5m instead of £10m, learn never to deal with shysters like this again and move on.
I fear for this club if this doesn't go through.
Royal Rother As has previously been mentioned who pays what fees cannot be a surprise to anyone. Such issues would all be included in a Heads of Agreement and due diligence.
It's possible that Vibrac's agreement with RFC stipulates that the latter should pay all fees and that we are trying to get SB to pay them.
These things always come up in the final stages of a takeover deal - and then, after a bit of posturing and brinkmanship they get sorted.
And as for Vibrac, they have a business model that allows for risk, they offer a "service" that very few others provide, they have clear terms and anyone who enters an arrangement with them knows very clearly what they are getting into.
Vibrac might well be somewhat rigid in how they deal with their debtors but they can't just create new clauses half way through a process just because it suits them.
Many knickers need to be untwisted over Vibrac's role.
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 16 Jul 2014 23:39
by Mike Hunt » 16 Jul 2014 23:55
LacosteSchards#2 FFS, just get the deal done, have a transfer budget of £9.5m instead of £10m, learn never to deal with shysters like this again and move on.
I fear for this club if this doesn't go through.
Top fukcing post. Sense
by Mike Hunt » 16 Jul 2014 23:57
Super Kevin Bremner! 25,000 people, £20 quid each, £500,000 = DONE!
Users browsing this forum: Orion1871 and 352 guests